But when it comes to female orgasms, long - term relationships seem to be the place to find them: 67 %
of women in relationships reported they had an orgasm with their partners the last time they had sex, which supports the commitment and affection perspective.
30 %
of women in relationships reported that their partner physically or sexually abused them.
One - hundred percent of engaged men rejected the offer and nearly 91 percent
of women in a relationship didn't think it was a fair trade.
Opie selected Suzanne Wright, explaining how she admires Wright's feminist approach in depicting people and their surroundings: «She is an amazing feminist using imagery
of women in relationship to a male dominant built environment.»
«Around 45 %
of women in a relationship cheat on their partners, versus 60 % of men», says psychologist and couples therapist Dr. Lonnie...
Not exact matches
As one pair
of sociologists from The University
of North Texas and Rice put it, «
in a society that encourages men to be dominant and
women to be submissive, having the image
of tall men hovering over short
women reinforces» the very idea that men must be the aggressors and the chasers when it comes to romantic
relationships.
A panel
of three entrepreneurs discussed the
relationship between purpose and profitability
in greater depth: Pocket Sun, who, as founding partner
of female - focused VC firm SoGal Ventures, has a purpose
of «building an empire for millennial
women to invest
in startups»; Eileen Gittins, a serial entrepreneur who founded book self - publishing firm Blurb and now runs Bossygrl, a mobile app meant to introduce Gen Z girls to entrepreneurship by helping them launch micro-businesses; and Cathie Reid, co-founder and current digital advisor to Icon Group, an Australian cancer - care company with annual revenue
of more than $ 1.5 billion.
The New York City - based «Academy» Urbaniak runs is aimed at teaching
women how to communicate
in influential and powerful ways, and get more
of what they want
in all kinds
of relationships, from the office boardroom to the bedroom.
The
woman who cuts my hair knows how old my kids are, if I'm
in a
relationship and the name
of my cat.»
Often, these kinds
of interactions can skew power dynamics
in relationships between men and
women, and leave the men coming out on top.
Example: Four
women were fired
in New Hampshire
in 2007 «
in part for gossiping and discussing rumors
of an improper
relationship between the town administrator and another employee that residents now agree were not true.»
Many are
women in relationships with men who desperately need to take care
of their feet.
Sandy Carter, a tech veteran and a founding board member
of WITI (
Women in Technology International), learned a valuable lesson when one
of her mentors pointed out that she always ate lunch at her desk, missing out on valuable opportunities to build
relationships and advance her career.
For instance, Linville writes, consider a
woman who thinks about her life mainly
in terms
of her career and her
relationship to her husband.
The team
of professors conducted an online survey
of 5,000 Japanese
women and men about their childhood
relationship with their parents, asking them to agree or disagree with statements like «My parents trusted me» and «I felt like my family had no interest
in me.»
Her new book, «Love Rules,» is about navigating romantic
relationships in today's climate, and ahead
of a panel on the subject at the
Women in the World Summit, we asked how her thoughts on #MeToo apply to the workplace.
And the information that they'll need will not only cover the basics but also emphasize «more
relationship - oriented and life - stage topics than bottom - line transactions,» says Liz Davidson, founder and CEO
of Financial Finesse, a company
in San Francisco that's dedicated to serving
women's investment needs.
The fact is, while the term «office wife» has seen a revival, these sorts
of fraught
relationships between men and
women have always been present
in the workplace.
A short video from one female executive won't change that, but hopefully a lot more
women in positions
of power and a growing awareness that burning the midnight oil takes a serious toll on families,
relationships and even individuals (not to mention a more equitable sharing
of housework and childcare between the sexes) will slowly make it safe for more
of us to say to our bosses — or admit to ourselves — what Sandberg has just said publicly.
The unwritten rule
of dating
in the US is that people (particularly
women) who get into bed with someone «too early» are presumed easy and might ruin their chances
of a serious
relationship.
In our first National Partner Organization (NPO) agreement, WBENC is strengthening its
relationship with WIPP to help us further fulfill our mission
of supporting and developing
women - owned businesses.
Coupled with the fear
of reprisal,
women on leave may also lose essential skills and
relationships in the workplace, says Fulshtinsky.
«
Women who become pen pals and groupies
of killers
in prison are those who have had a dysfunctional
relationship with their dad that has made them feel unloveable,» she said.
Your
Relationship Manager can give you more information about our Family Enterprise Forum events, including a copy
of our research study
Women in Asian Family Enterprises: Understanding the past — Looking to the future.
The need for adequate legal aid is very compelling
in situations where a
woman is attempting to leave an abusive
relationship, and her life and her physical and emotional security are at risk, as is the safety
of her children.
While Canadian
women are just as likely as men to use the services
of an advisor, and with relatively similar results
in satisfaction with them, they tend to value the «soft» elements
of the client - advisor
relationship more than men do.
Last summer,
in an expose published by The Information, Caldbeck, who'd previously been an investor with Lightspeed Venture Partners, was accused
of making unwanted sexual advances toward six
women who said they were groped and propositioned during their professional
relationship with him.
It seems to me that
in some Christian circles, we have created a culture that tells single
women that they must wait on men to make the first move, that they should give the brunt
of responsibility
in relationships to the man.
But partly, I think this is also a representation
of the kind
of relationships some
women allow themselves to engage
in.
Sometimes, the way this plays out is
women passively following along
in an ambiguous, awkward, who - knows - what - this - is kind
of relationship where they have no idea if the guy is interested
in them or just sees them as their «sister
in Christ.»
Some awkwardness and misunderstanding is inevitable
in relationships, but sometimes, Christian
women get so bogged down by the concept
of men being «leaders» that we fail to recognize that God only calls us into this kind
of «leading»
relationship within the walls
of a loving, respect - filled, and mutually submissive marriage.
This kind
of interdependence
in a male / female
relationship is echoed
in 1 Corinthians 11:11: «Neither is man independent
of woman, nor
woman independent
of man,
in the Lord» (NKJV).
If man is not made more
in the image
of God than
woman is, then how does man leading church better represent the
relationship of God to man than a
woman leading church would?
These men had certain worldviews which they included
in their writings — views
of the
relationships of men and
women to each other and
in society, views on slavery, political concerns, etc..
In hindu dark ages, a woman was laying in bed, while her husband was away, she was having her lust pleasing dreams in hindu secular ism, filthy self center ism of enjoying company of her husband in bed in a hindu darkened cave, a hindu filthy languor, secular daddy of hindu hanuman, stupid monkey, secular, every hindu believes to be their god saw her moaning and took advantage of her, her husband came back and had relationship, but she had already been pregnant by hindu crook languor, filthy secula
In hindu dark ages, a
woman was laying
in bed, while her husband was away, she was having her lust pleasing dreams in hindu secular ism, filthy self center ism of enjoying company of her husband in bed in a hindu darkened cave, a hindu filthy languor, secular daddy of hindu hanuman, stupid monkey, secular, every hindu believes to be their god saw her moaning and took advantage of her, her husband came back and had relationship, but she had already been pregnant by hindu crook languor, filthy secula
in bed, while her husband was away, she was having her lust pleasing dreams
in hindu secular ism, filthy self center ism of enjoying company of her husband in bed in a hindu darkened cave, a hindu filthy languor, secular daddy of hindu hanuman, stupid monkey, secular, every hindu believes to be their god saw her moaning and took advantage of her, her husband came back and had relationship, but she had already been pregnant by hindu crook languor, filthy secula
in hindu secular ism, filthy self center ism
of enjoying company
of her husband
in bed in a hindu darkened cave, a hindu filthy languor, secular daddy of hindu hanuman, stupid monkey, secular, every hindu believes to be their god saw her moaning and took advantage of her, her husband came back and had relationship, but she had already been pregnant by hindu crook languor, filthy secula
in bed
in a hindu darkened cave, a hindu filthy languor, secular daddy of hindu hanuman, stupid monkey, secular, every hindu believes to be their god saw her moaning and took advantage of her, her husband came back and had relationship, but she had already been pregnant by hindu crook languor, filthy secula
in a hindu darkened cave, a hindu filthy languor, secular daddy
of hindu hanuman, stupid monkey, secular, every hindu believes to be their god saw her moaning and took advantage
of her, her husband came back and had
relationship, but she had already been pregnant by hindu crook languor, filthy secular.
You began talking about the essential nature
of God, how God's
relationship to us is mirrored more
in (any) man than (any)
woman, regardless
of the gender
of the person
in question.
This game
of seduction may or may not result
in a longterm
relationship, but if it does, I would be willing to bet that even ten years down the road there are still things that this man and
woman are learning about one another that they didn't know previously.
The correct polygamist
relationship is one with multiple males — all employed - and if there's enough men
in a marrige working together towards the same goal — pleasing the
woman of course — just maybe they will eventually figure out how to make at least one
woman happy.
There are some issues that get all the attention because different societies view some behavior as wrong while other are ok with it (e.g. role
of women in the society, same se.x
relationships, etc.).
There have been,
of course, prevailing perspectives - about
women as guardians
of the Christian home, about our celebrations as essentially private, domestic affairs, about the need
in a consumer society to validate our deepest social
relationships through cards, flowers and candies.
But because
of the violent nature
of porn and way porn demeans
women and causes a breakdown
in relationships, I never thought that
women would be drawn to the sexually violent, explicit material.
In this relationship, the man plays the role of Jesus, while the woman plays the role of the church, so that the world will see their covenant relationship to one another and have an idea of what it is like to be in a right relationship with Go
In this
relationship, the man plays the role
of Jesus, while the
woman plays the role
of the church, so that the world will see their covenant
relationship to one another and have an idea
of what it is like to be
in a right relationship with Go
in a right
relationship with God.
If you're going to give me a line about «the customs
of the day» I'll toss it right back at you — the custom
of the current day has been «one man one
woman», but it's a custom which will hopefully morph into «two consenting adults
in a committed
relationship» with gender a non-issue.
It seems clear to me that the feminist assertion
of the interconnectedness
of all things moves
in the direction
of perceiving this Self - formation process as emerging out
of our
relationships with other
women.
The demands on a
woman to obtain the roundest education, the most fulfilled career, the highest promotion, the perfect
relationship, and to «squeeze
in two children» — all these are set against a backdrop
of her diminishing fertility.
Rather, she explores the complex
of emotions that beset a
woman seeking to navigate the unpredictable waters
of contemporary
relationships — sleeping with a married man who
in turn has an unfaithful wife («Don't think
of me»); longing for a lover who slipped away without saying good bye («My lover's gone»), vaunting one's independence whilst yearning for some permanent connection («My life»), feeling deeply uncomfortable with oneself: «I just want to feel safe
in my own skin.»
I learned about equality even from Paul, who taught that with the resurrection, something radical had changed — not merely ontologically, but functionally —
in the
relationships between slaves and masters, Jews and Gentiles, men and
women, rendering those whose identity was once rooted
in hierarchy and division brothers and sisters
in Jesus Christ instead; who put a radical gospel - spin on the Greco - Roman household codes, breaking down the hierarchies so that slaves and masters, wives and husbands were charged with submitting «one to another» with the humility
of Jesus as their model; who taught that power was overrated and that service will be rewarded; who surrounded himself with
women he called «co-workers.»
What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part
of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence
of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence
of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian
women teaching
in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian
women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line
of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry
of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy
of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws
of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant
in one moment, but important enough to display
in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading
of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse
of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender
relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.
This is because
in this mutual
relationship, which Genesis 2:23 - 25 speaks
of, the man and the
woman become a gift for each other, through the whole truth and evidence
of their own body
in its masculinity and femininity.
Forced gender roles impacts
relationships in countless negative ways, but the one I want to unpack here is the way this form
of legalism can hamper honest communication between spouses by requiring
women to «influence» their husbands without ever actually leading them.