``... relief should be prompt, given the needs
of women seeking abortions and the need for available clinics to serve their needs.»
«So let's work together to reduce the number
of women seeking abortions by reducing unintended pregnancies, and making adoption more available, and providing care and support for women who do carry their child to term,» Obama said to applause.
In his 2009 Notre Dame address, Obama called upon abortion rights supporters and opponents to «work together to reduce the number
of women seeking abortions.»
President Obama believes we should be working together to reduce the number
of women seeking abortions.
This is pretty surprising, since most often we think
of women seeking abortions as single, scared and coerced by some withdrawn male.
But should a pro-lifer raise her voice, use vivid language, or, heck, even pray in front of an abortion clinic, she will often be accused of intimidation and of posing a threat to the safety
of women seeking abortions and those who provide them.
In fact, banning abortion may actually have an adverse effect on reducing the number
of women seeking abortions.
Not exact matches
Even in situations where
abortion is legal, the process
of finding a legitimate provider is time - consuming and difficult, forcing many
women — particularly those who are young, poor, and uneducated — to
seek out illegal options.
As Barroso explained, the black market nature
of abortions in Brazil has attracted scam artists who exploit the vulnerability
of women seeking to end their pregnancies.
In addition to the health threats,
women who
seek an illegal
abortion in Brazil are under the constant threat
of criminal action.
A disproportionate number
of women who
seek illegal
abortions in Brazil are poor, young, and uneducated.
Furthermore, as I became more involved in the feminist conversation (some feminists are pro-life,
of course, but many are pro-choice), I began to understand some
of the arguments against the criminalization
of abortion, like that banning
abortion does not necessarily reduce the
abortion rate, that enforcing a ban on all
abortions would be impossible, and that
women would likely
seek out
abortions through unsafe, illegal procedures anyway.
We, as a society, must take away as many
of the reasons
women seek abortions as possible.
Yet a million or more
women each year, automatically excluded from the realm
of legality, are forced to
seek out a private abortionist, to attempt
abortion on themselves, or, if they are unmarried, to bear the child illegitimately.
Carefully distinguishing the termination
of a planned pregnancy from the
abortions of «other»
women, Christians are
seeking theological justification for their decisions to terminate disabled fetuses.
The law, recently enacted in Texas, where
women seeking an
abortion are required to be raped, is one example
of these «
abortion prevention» measures.
And several thousand
women receive assistance each year to
seek abortions overseas in Great Britain, though the proportion
of Irish
women who receive
abortions is dwarfed by the
abortion rate in the United Kingdom and the Unites States.
In 2007 it urged Poland «to ensure that
women seeking legal
abortion have access to it, and that their access is not limited by the use
of the conscientious objection clause.»
Most Americans probably support the implicit moral position
of mainstream Protestantism and perhaps
of America's religious traditions in general: permit as few legal
abortions as possible without damaging
women's rights and without making it necessary for
women to perform
abortions on themselves or
seek clandestine and possibly dangerous
abortions.
In Bray v. Alexandria
Women's Clinic (1993), the Court examined whether anti-abortion demonstrators could be held liable — under the Ku Klux Klan act of 1871 (amended in 1985)-- of conspiring to deprive women of the equal protection of the laws by depriving women seeking abortions of their right to interstate tr
Women's Clinic (1993), the Court examined whether anti-abortion demonstrators could be held liable — under the Ku Klux Klan act
of 1871 (amended in 1985)--
of conspiring to deprive
women of the equal protection of the laws by depriving women seeking abortions of their right to interstate tr
women of the equal protection
of the laws by depriving
women seeking abortions of their right to interstate tr
women seeking abortions of their right to interstate travel.
The agenda
seeks to address
women's health issues with the passage
of the Comprehensive Contraceptive Coverage Act and codifying
abortion rights into state law.
Yet DFS offers no estimate
of how much, nor does it document how much
of an obstacle copayments have been for
women seeking abortions.
The mailer includes Trump quotes about a wall along the U.S. - Mexican border he says he'll make Mexicans pay for, and his comments that «there has to be some form
of punishment» for
women who
seek abortions.
Women's rights: Cuomo reiterated his support for
abortion rights He wants to ban employers from asking job - seekers about their past pay, and will
seek to require state contractors to report the gender and pay
of employees.
The amendment's aim is to break the stranglehold on
abortion counselling
of certain groups which Dorries and Field say have a financial conflict
of interest in advising
women seeking terminations, and open up counselling to independent counsellers.
Other groups
seeking exemptions from donor disclosure include the New York Civil Liberties Union, which often defends controversial acts
of free speech, and the entire coalition
of women's groups that backed Governor Cuomo's Women's Equality Act, which includes the abortion provi
women's groups that backed Governor Cuomo's
Women's Equality Act, which includes the abortion provi
Women's Equality Act, which includes the
abortion provision.
The other study included some 900
women from Finland, Norway, Sweden and Austria, who
sought medicinal
abortion treatment up to nine weeks
of pregnancy.
«Our study gives further insight into the ways that the clinic closures due to Texas's restrictive law resulted in an undue burden on
women seeking access to
abortion care in Texas,» said Daniel Grossman, MD, an investigator with TxPEP and director
of Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH) at UC San Francisco.
Yesterday the Supreme Court struck down a Texas law that would have forced the closure
of abortion clinics that didn't meet strict requirements — requirements the justices decided (by a 5 - to - 3 margin) didn't make
women any safer and put an undue burden on their constitutional right to
seek safe and legal medical care.
«After Tiller» Lana Wilson and Martha Shane focus on the continued and frustrating efforts
of four U.S. doctors to practice late - term
abortions, and they also crucially show us the conflicted
women and couples
seeking such a procedure.
These bills provide a roadmap for state policymakers
seeking to fight government interference within the patient - provider relationship, promote
women - centered approaches in the provision
of abortion and other reproductive health care services, and enact legislation that emphasizes the need to expand access to
abortion.
It is
of particular relevance to
women's equality and access to justice for a variety
of reasons, including the fear that an ICBC adjuster can read about a
woman's therapeutic
abortion or sexual assault history, which may in turn prevent
women from
seeking damages in personal injury matters.
Because
of the cost
of some drug regimes, this has penalizing effects for certain groups
of women, including pregnant
women seeking medical
abortions and
women with HIV.
In addition to prohibiting sexual intimacy outside
of marriage between a man and a
woman, TWU indicates an expectation that female students and staff will not
seek abortion services while attending or working at TWU.
On Jan. 1, the Liberal government
of New Brunswick eliminated a requirement that
women seeking fully funded
abortions in that province have the approval
of two doctors (to certify that the procedure was «medically necessary»).
According to the Court, unnecessary health regulations that have the purpose or effect
of presenting a substantial obstacle to a
woman seeking an
abortion impose an undue burden.
Proponents
of such restrictions are ultimately
seeking to make
abortion inaccessible for U.S.
women, and so are
seeking to shutter Planned Parenthood health centers and any safety - net health center providing publicly funded family planning services that additionally offers
abortions (using other funds), or is affiliated with an
abortion provider.
As
of October 1, 2011, the State
of Texas requires all
women seeking an
abortion to have an ultrasound at least 24 hours before the
abortion.
At least half
of the
women in her clinic
seeking abortion care had been using contraception when they got pregnant; therefore, she claims, Planned Parenthood may be good at providing birth control «to the masses» but not at providing good contraceptive and related education.
For far too long, the United States has penalized low - income
women seeking abortion — forcing those already struggling to make ends meet to pay the biggest proportion
of her income for safe, legal care.
At the beginning
of 2012, it appeared that a number
of states were poised to require a
woman seeking an
abortion to first undergo an ultrasound.
We at Planned Parenthood Action Fund are all about putting Trump in his place, but the backlash against the concept
of punishing
abortion -
seeking women is incomplete without acknowledging two points:
With the addition
of the new requirements in Texas and North Carolina, 26 states mandate that a
woman seeking an
abortion must wait a prescribed period of time between the counseling and the procedure; nine of these states require that the counseling be provided in person, a provision that requires the woman to make two trips to the facility (see Counseling and Waiting Periods for Ab
abortion must wait a prescribed period
of time between the counseling and the procedure; nine
of these states require that the counseling be provided in person, a provision that requires the
woman to make two trips to the facility (see Counseling and Waiting Periods for
AbortionAbortion).
Subsequent to alerting U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, Planned Parenthood learned the identify
of one
of those involved and believes these visits are likely a hoax by opponents
of legal
abortion seeking to discredit Planned Parenthood, which delivers preventive health care and
abortion services to three million
women each year.
This bill goes even further,
seeking to limit American
women's access to
abortion and no - cost birth control and blocking implementation
of the groundbreaking provisions
of the Affordable Care Act.
Online Documentary: Fazeelat Aslam, VICE.com, for her piece, «Misconception: The Fake
Abortion Clinics
of America» on VICE.com, which exposed the false information perpetuated by so - called «crisis pregnancy centers» and the harm they can do to
women seeking care and the broader reproductive rights movement as a whole.
In June, the United States Supreme Court clearly ruled in Whole
Woman's Health v Hellerstedt that the same medically unnecessary restrictions in Texas created an undue burden, which violated the constitutional rights
of a patient
seeking safe and legal
abortion.
The June Coleman Fund is available for
women seeking abortion services with a household income less than 250 %
of the Federal Poverty Index, but not on a Maryland Medicaid plan.
Planned Parenthood Federation
of America (PPFA) and Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota (PPMNS) applaud today's decision by the U.S. District Court in South Dakota striking down major portions
of a South Dakota law that required doctors to give ideologically charged and misleading information to
women seeking abortion care.
Planned Parenthood Federation
of America applauds today's preliminary injunction issued by U.S. District Judge Laurie Smith Camp against Nebraska's recently enacted «The
Women's Health Protection Act,» which requires physicians who may perform an
abortion to discuss the entire body
of research literature about possible health risks related to
abortion with their patients who are
seeking abortions, even though much
of this information may be outdated, false or misleading.