Sentences with phrase «of writers feels»

Also like the jokes in the film, the amount of writers feels like overkill for such rudimentary approach to a spy genre film.

To further ensure your satisfaction, you can even handpick which of our writers you feel you would like to use.

«I found a pirated copy of my book on a site that was «sharing» a lot of authors» works and I understand why a lot of those writers felt very violated.

Not exact matches

For anyone who is feeling uncertain about the upcoming transfer of power, writer and illustrator Christopher Noxon has turned his recent tour of the Civil Rights Museum in Memphis into a motivational text that links lessons learned in the 1950s and «60s with today's strange times.

He was an accomplished poet and sports journalist and a fiction writer with a strong feel for open spaces and the pull and consequences of history.

Beyond being an incredible song, its chorus became a rallying cry of protesters in the United States — «a kind of comfort that people of color and other oppressed communities desperately need all too often: the hope — the feeling — that despite tensions in this country growing worse and worse, in the long run, we're all gon» be all right,» as Slate culture writer Aisha Harris put it.

At first, it felt strange to admit that, as the leader of a content company, I wasn't a naturally brilliant writer.

Designed by Brad Ellis of Tall West, the new mark represents Stratechery's emphasis on writing, the focus on technology, and, of course, my drawings.3 The Archer type - face is a call - back to Stratechery's original Courier, and the feeling of a type - writer.

They may contain representative photos of a prospect or buyer (like stock imagery) to «paint a picture» and make a writer feel like she / he is writing for a specific person.

But mostly I am saddened by writers who feel the need to preempt the objections of people whose objections are not worth taking seriously in the first place.

Based solely on the massive amount of ink and HTML being spilled about Vampire Weekend, you would think that most music writers feel like most people start playing music because...

The sort of remark I have in mind is the kind where, in a post about an unrelated topic, an author feels the need to bring up some moral accusation against the writer he is discussing and make very clear that he, the blogger, is on the right side of that debate.

In a description of the writer Andre Dubus, we are told, «The relationship between Dubus and his father, then, feels comfortably preconciliar: he is shy with the older man, but their silence goes deeper.»

I really felt the meaning of your writing, and I can't imagine a writer who doesn't feel satisfied to know this.

Zeus and Osiris may not be the best examples of gods that could incite the same feelings as the writer had when he implied that God is not offended by the disorder of our minds etc..

Heidi said «Zeus and Osiris may not be the best examples of gods that could incite the same feelings as the writer had when he implied that God is not offended by the disorder of our minds etc..

writer of article says the minute Judas knew what he had done he felt remorse.

We do have to be sensible in the ways we help all of our brothers and sisters, but we can't protect ourselves from feeling their pain by dismissing them with the myths the article writer explores

None of the 40 writers of the Bible felt that way.

One writer put it even more compellingly: «I went to Mississippi in the summer of 1964 because I felt «called» to do so.

And then that moment of birth being one of complete relief and release and joy, yes absolutely, but instead of popping champagne corks or bursting into laughter, I cried from the core of myself — like some ancient writer said, I lifted up my voice and I wept, because she was finally here and we were alive and we were safe and I felt held by the God - with - us; it was the most human and most sacred thing I'd ever done in my life, it felt like a glimpse of Incarnation.

In sum, our reporter friend and those like him should not feel guilty about agreeing with Steele, Loury, Crouch, and other writers who are waking us up to the disastrous consequences of policies promoted under the banner of «civil rights.»

The human writers of scripture certainly though so, and they also thought God felt this way too, but does it «make sense?»

'' Putting Parents in Charge» is one of those feel «good statements that a writer knows one can not refute without sounding like an unreasonable extremist.

The awful moral choice forced on Senator Kerrey is a commonplace aspect of war, not understood at all by professors and editorial writers who imagine, with obscene hubris, that they could avoid the guilt feelings associated with combat.

David felt his statement was true saying «I was talking about the grand sweep of the biblical writers» attempts to describe God».

For many years, I felt that part of my call as a writer and blogger of faith was to be a different sort of evangelical, to advocate for things like gender equality, respect for LGBT people, and acceptance of science and biblical scholarship within my community.

Like an angsty teenager's favorite song, Kenneth Reid is a writer who puts the feelings of frustrated Christians into words that make them think, «He so gets me.»

And where the biblical writers felt the need to distinguish between the body's needs and impulses and those of the soul, they did not hesitate to do so.

If the writer wrote, «I know you hate me and feel uncomfortable around me, but I love you anyway because of how much undeserved love I've found in Christ,» that would be much more Christian than, «Let me tell you all the ways you annoy me and everything you're doing wrong.»

I recalled that the last time I looked at the book, more than ten years ago, I felt embarrassed by the naïveté and piety of the young writer who sought to authorize her insights and proposals by quoting numerous theological, psychological and sociological authorities.

Although a devout Christian, the writer of that letter had undoubtedly felt the influence of hellenizing thought that was dominant in the civilization of which he was a part; and that kind of thought made just such a distinction between soul and body.

But the Christian experience of the risen Lord is of being confronted by an external reality that is both of God (and not simply from God), yet also distinct from God the Father: as he cries «my Lord and my God,» the Christian feels as all the New Testament writers emphasize — that the living presence which confronts him is that of Jesus.

The interpreter has to look for that meaning which a biblical writer intended and expressed in his particular circumstances, and in his historical and cultural context, by means of such literary genres as were in use at his time, To understand correctly what a biblical writer intended to assert, due attention is needed both to the customary and characteristic ways of feeling, speaking and storytelling which were current in his time, and to the social conventions of the period.

In full repudiation of the power and mystic realism of symbols, a writer in Deuteronomy argues that even in the personal presence of their God, manifest in the great theophany on Sinai, no physical form was apparent, but only an invisible presence felt in power and in religious perception:

Not to mention the writers of the various texts also having their own focus or agenda, which is why each of the Gospels feels different.

His view is that Paul basically gave himself free reign here at the start of his teachings to the gentiles (see also 1:1 a: «Paulos, apostolos ouk ap anthroopoon, oude di anthroopon, alla dia Iesou Christou, kia Theou patros...») and then started preaching his own theology heavily influenced by his own biases and preferences — not that any of the writers were ever completely exempt from it of course, but still the writer felt Paul was quite fundamentalistic at times about certain things he had some clear opinions about, e.g. about relationships and women's position in the church etc, which he then propagated as part of the gospel.

If culture is the way people think and feel and behave as a people, and if spirituality is the way we live out the life and teachings of Jesus in this particular culture at this particular time, then the questions for thinkers, writers, theologians, and religious professionals must become: What cultural realities are challenging the Gospel now?

The writer of an unsigned article in The New Yorker, describing a feeling experienced at the funeral of a friend whose long and happy life had been spent as a wife and mother, caught it well:

I feel happy for the writer of this article because she's sharing about the simple joys in her life.

Reality is constantly measured in terms of self, of personal feelings and desires, which, as soap opera script writers never tire of telling us, will not, must not, can not be denied.

And as I knelt in the chapel under the statue of Our Lady, I thought about a recent controversy in which a popular Protestant pastor, theologian, and writer named John Piper claimed that Christianity has «a masculine feel.»

It can also reveal the author's attempt, present in most studies if only by implication, to correct what the writer feels is an overemphasis in the corpus of previous studies on another perspective.

Right is right and wrong is wrong... and I have to say... regardless of how I feel about Beck... that the writer of this article was wrong.

Many Catholic writers who admit that the times have changed in this respect do so resignedly; and even add that perhaps it is as well not to waste feelings in regretting the matter, for to return to the heroic corporeal discipline of ancient days might be an extravagance.

He wrote and wrote and wrote» a discipline of writing that almost every other writer I know has told me feels like an indictment: the books, and the innumerable essays, and all those talks he flew around to give.

The writers of Manhunt: Unabomber try to make us feel invested in the fight over forensic linguistics by tying it to the family and career struggles of James Fitzgerald (Sam Worthington), a depressive, monomaniacal FBI rookie with a previous career as a Philly beat cop.

Moreover, this book does not mount the ramparts to defend the Bible against the onslaughts of the modern world; nor does the writer feel guilty for asking, even pressing, a modern reader's questions.

He has (for reasons I find it difficult to fathom) the reputation of being an intellectual heavyweight: Catholic writers clearly opposed to him tend to feel obliged to make some such acknowledgement, perhaps in the interests of fairness.

A writer friend of mine recently confessed that she floundered a bit in writing her memoir because she felt pressure from her girlfriends to write with an inspirational tone more characteristic of Beth Moore or Stasi Eldredge than Donald Miller.