Sentences with phrase «of wrong individuals»

blaming Islam for the wrongdoing of wrong individuals is a lie.

Strive to be an excellent Realtor Kevin, and then you too can defend «yourself» on this site against the onslaught of wronged individuals who could have done better had they excercised their own due diligence, if indeed they did not do so, when supposedly rationally choosing an excellent Realtor to represent their fiduciary interests.

Not exact matches

Anxious individuals remember facts and details better, but they also tend to get the emotional tenor of the situation wrong more often.

It has been at the heart of political revolutions, such as the Arab Spring, it has given a voice to individuals who have been wronged and those socially disenfranchised, such as the impact it has had on raising awareness of the #metoo movement, or the GoFundMe campaign that raised over $ 200,000 for a homeless veteran.

«So the individuals who think they'll be laid off because of AI or robotics are wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong,» the Emirates boss said.

If this information were to get into the wrong hands, some of it could be used in identity theft scams against both businesses and individuals.

Its a zero sum game and the individual is almost always on the wrong end of the trade.

Researchers also conducted more intimate, in - person interviews with over 300 individuals that had been in unions for 30, 40, 50, or more years, as well as a group of divorced individuals to figure out what went wrong.

The emulation looks and feels perfect — I didn't get to spend that much time with any individual game during my half hour of play, but I feel like if something were wrong with Secret of Mana I'd know pretty fast.

Instead, the fear and greed psychology that dominates individual investors cause many to move in and out of markets, often at the wrong times.

Corporations and individuals sometimes find themselves on the wrong side of public opinion.

Moreover, his frequent assertion that the Protestant Reformation was all about elevating the conscience of the individual is certainly wrong.

All religion teaches some form of right and wrong or good or bad philosophy, but, it's the individual who has to choose to do right or wrong or good or bad.

Of these there must be, at least, ten thousand, every individual of every one of which believes all wrong but his owOf these there must be, at least, ten thousand, every individual of every one of which believes all wrong but his owof every one of which believes all wrong but his owof which believes all wrong but his own.

we're talking about a large population of scientists from a diverse span of disciplines — and fyi: large bodies of individuals can't keep secrets - and scientists can't wait to find something wrong with the data.

But, if you feel there is never a wrong reason for becoming a christian, even if an individual does it for no other reason than playing it safe, never believed in god, will go their whole never never truly bielving, does the minimum (paying lip service), and to really point a cherry on top, doesn't live anything close to a «christian lifestyle outside of the few hours on Sundays (just a rotten to the core person, thief, liar, cheater... rappist, murderer...) Is there STILL no wrong reason for becoming religeous?

That was wrong and an abuse of power and position to discredit an individual, rationalize a divorce and cover up an affair.

It is wrong because it distorts sex, which is meant to bring two human beings together, instead of closing the individual in on himself or herself.

The historians who devoted all their attention to general causes were, he thought, wrong to deny the special influence of individuals, merely because such influence was more difficult to track than had been the case in earlier times.

Nevertheless, this coming reign of God involved the ending of social wrongs, and it is of importance to note that, so far as the records reveal, Jesus» concern about social iniquities always sprang from his indignant perception of their ill effect on individuals.

The fact of sin and the assurance of punishment, the sense of wrong and the practice of vengeance, the ideal of justice and the power of religion — all were operative forces but no one of them primarily concerned the individual; he came under their sway mainly as a member of the community.

To suggest that total voluntary exclusion and participation in an individual's self selected religious practices and spiritual life is somehow politically incorrect or wrong, or making it a target of criticism or political point, is nothing less than a display of ignorance and disregard for individual rights.

This vengeance was directed, not necessarily against the individual who had done the wrong, but against the whole family, clan, or tribe to which he belonged or against any single member of it, however innocent himself.

Every normal individual beyond infancy has enough freedom to make choices of right and wrong; no individual has enough freedom to do everything he wants to do.

Many of these are reinforced by group activities based on values clarification, which tend towards rejecting external moral restrictions and setting up the individual as the judge of what is right and wrong for them.

«The reality unfortunately is... the focus of that anger and annoyance is often focused at the wrong place and on the wrong individuals.

This is a fair statement of the view of those ministers who regard drinking as wrong but who also recognize the existence of various etiological factors which are beyond the control of the individual.

But it seems wrong to say that an individual is morally bound to engage in discourse whenever a recipient of her or his action contests its moral validity.

Do not get me wrong, I believe there are Justified (Saved from hell) individuals amongst Jehovah's witnesses, mormons, name your cult etc... Whom are confused or just may not have a full understanding of who Jesus is, but I might posit, that not having a full comprehension of the Trinity or Jesus being fully God and Fully man, is different from denying it.

An extremely hypocritical question to ask anyone... only an arrogant individual could imagine themselves as having the right type of faith... and someone else «the wrong.»

A fundamental Christian can use the same Biblical standards to examine the belief systems of an individual and say... there is something wrong.

As to which party is right or wrong??? That is the perception of the individual.

The victim of the bandits on the Jerusalem - Jericho road, the widow mistreated by an unjust judge, the unfortunates on whom publicans like Zacchaeus practised extortion, the destitute at a rich man's door, prisoners unvisited and hungry folk unfed — always it was wronged individuals who called out from Jesus a social message.3

The word Messiah, which means literally «anointed one,» points strictly, of course, to an individual; but in the psychology of Israel with its facile and often unconscious transitions from individual to corporate personality, we are hardly wrong in allowing a broader definition to the term Messianism, in which emphasis is placed upon the redemptive function of the human entity, whether group or individual.

Just as it is gravely wrong to take from individuals what they can accomplish by their own initiative and industry and give it to the community, so also it is an injustice and at the same time a grave evil and disturbance of right order to assign to a greater and higher association what lesser and subordinate organizations can do.

But it would be wrong to suppose that he so «spiritualized» the idea of the kingdom of God as to make it relevant only to the inner life of the individual.

This is why Brooks is so wrong when he writes that «the frontier demands a certain sort of individual, a venturesome, hard - working, disciplined individual who goes off in search of personal transformation.»

It can not be the duty of individuals or society to take away the sphere of freedom, even in the case of wrong decisions, from other human beings.

Often one has the impression that arguments for immortality or for the continued existence of the individual are infected by a wrong kind of self - regard.

She pays to stay there, unless the landlord can show in the RENT AGREEMENT that what she is doing is wrong, really its just a pathetic attempt by a pathetic individual to silence freedom of religon.

Sollicitudo Rei Socialis (1987) recognized that structural sin, that is to say, the structures of society, as well as individual decisions, can be wrong.

[Ali, 1997:76] Even though peace and reconciliation are given priority, there are the possibilities of individuals reading several texts of the Qur» an to find support in engaging in acts of aggression and war like that of September 11, aiming at those who are identified as enemies of Islam or to those who have wronged the Islamic community.

It would be wrong of me to blame or judge those good men for the actions of a small percentage of sick individuals in the priesthood that bishops wrongly chose to protect.

Religion can lead an individual to mental health, but the wrong kind of religion can also help make an individual mentally ill.

The Church's argument is not that is wrong for practising Catholics to have sex outside marriage, or enter same - sex marriages, but rather that it is not truly good for any human being to do those things, regardless of that individual's feelings.

We've been wise to restrict the concept of rights to individuals, terribly wrong when groups are given rights that supercede the rights of individuals.

It is one of the oldest of sociological generalizations that any coherent and viable society rests on a common set of moral understandings about good and bad, right and wrong, in the realm of individual and social action.

All of these are occur at the larger level of organized religion, but that doesn't mean that the religious experience / belief / and hope of the individual is wrong or baseless or false.

There were an almost infinite number of rights and wrongs for individuals in their public and private life.

«I immediately pointed out that not only is a prayer at a public ceremony unconsti - tutional, but to force someone to give the illusion of religion when the individual does not believe in any religion is blatantly wrong and very illegal,» the soldier said in an e-mail to the foundation.»