Sentences with phrase «of wrong order»

Attentive problem - solving at the instance of wrong order fulfillment missed by senior management and methods of solving the issue at hand while keeping high satisfaction of customers.

Also, they will fix the problem of wrong order delivery by re-processing your order and making sure that the order is correct letter template samples.

Not exact matches

Product dimensions would be in inches, not centimetres or entered in the wrong order: width by height by length, instead of, say, length by width by height.

Unfortunately, I made the mistake of ordering the wrong color.

Making decisions when 30 % of the time you will be wrong is just the pace you need to move at in order to make progress with a startup.

«Often, when doctors don't know what's wrong, they order a battery of tests.

Consumer targeting is necessary for every business in order to avoid loss of information or wrong communication.

Priebus added that the order was rolled out quickly because «this is all done for the protection of Americans, and waiting another three days, waiting another three weeks is something that we don't want to get wrong.»

«Right out of college, I was an assistant receptionist for a big - time entertainment executive in New York,» recalled Kirsten Helvey, now the chief operating officer of Cornerstone OnDemand in Santa Monica, Calif. «One day, I got his lunch order wrong.»

Joseph Stiglitz and other economists in the West's public eye have began to explain that there is something radically wrong with the financialized order imported by Western ideological salesmen in the wake of the Soviet collapse.

With the software laid down, it's also a safe bet there will be advances on the idea that blockchains can and should connect in order to assuage businesses wary of investing in the wrong tech, or being worried about getting boxed out of future business opportunities.

The author of The Happiness Advantage and CEO of Good Think Inc., a research and consulting firm, points out that the common understanding that happiness as the last thing to happen after success achieved by working hard has the order all wrong.

As wrong as we view it today, with our understanding of betrayal, we may not be able to comprehend the magnitude of what was required in order to bring about the miracle of Easter.

There is nothing wrong with an order of service.

Dreher is not wrong to alert us to the destructive power individualism and unbridled desire exert on the social fabric, but he would do even better to recognize that, by God's grace, new forms of order manage to emerge out of the apparent chaos of social fragmentation.

And one may, without being unpleasant about it, note that the mainstream media and the scientific establishment who beat the drums for the necessity of killing embryos in order, they said, to find cures for all kinds of illnesses, along with politicians who agitated for multibillion - dollar referendums in California, Missouri, and New Jersey, were, not to put too fine a point on it, dead wrong.

When we get it wrong, we fix the model — to a new order of approximation.

It's ok to not buy into the Christian ideas of god and what not, but to spread lies in order to further justify your lack of belief / hatred is just wrong.

the bible gives the wrong order for the evolution of plants and animals on earth.

The context of you arguement would be -LCB- tell me if I am wrong -RCB- that it is within the natural order of things that you don't need the Bible to teach morality.

It would be taken up in the order of grace and would be governed by the wisdom of the soul, not by the material environment, in terms of right and wrong, good and bad.

Furthermore, from the Christian sight, a man, which has become a leader of a heretical church is to treat harsh, in order to show him that something is wrong.

By the end of his Anglican curacy, disillusionment with the liberal, almost secularist, approach which he had found in some of his fellow churchmen, niggling doubts about the validity of Anglican orders and the dawning realisation that the C of E was attempting the impossible by trying to serve both God and State, had convinced Father Ed that he was in the wrong Church.

In order to preserve the community of men, we are often compelled to accept wrongs in decisions concerning the community.

When you have a world filled with liars and adulterers and murderers and greed and selfishness (even though we know what's right and what's wrong but we do it anyway) and the God that created you loves you so much that he needs to sacrifice his Son for all of us who have not kept his Law, in order to wipe out those terrible sins, then you should be praying that you're counted as one who kept his Laws.

It is not unusual therefore to find pastoral care «overlooking what was mildly wrong,» in order to take seriously what matters more urgently.7 Effective pastoral care must be free to exercise a kind of tolerance for vice, allowing a certain compulsion to continue while deliberately reducing another more dangerous one.8

From a general as well as from the pastoral point of view it would be wrong to assume that the Church in the various countries needed only to follow the directives of the Council willingly and exactly in order to fulfill her God - given task in this time.

a set of values, beliefs, and structure in a person's life in order to give them direction and a sense of right and wrong is fine, but organized religions are no more than large corporations, and like any large corporation are only focused on their bottom line... trying to control the public and extract as much money as they can from them by any means necessary... promoting fear, uncertainty, hate and a sense that they alone can offer salvation... for a price (although they are very cleaver about getting to this hidden and unspoken cost... after all these hundreds of years they have perfected their craft well!)

And, for the good of the order, hearsay does not mean that the evidence it presents in wrong — its simply an issue of weight one should give the evidence (particularly if other evidence is available).

The only difference is while homeopaths are insanely wrong with some 30 orders of magnitude (from a biologically active drug), creationists are insanely wrong with 90 (from a cosmologically active process)!

His story, and that of other Chinese Indonesian Christians, has much to teach us as we consider whether or not to embrace Rod Dreher's Benedict Option (retreat in order to rebuild), or instead seek positive solutions to social problems in an America that judges us on the wrong side of history.

Honesty compels us to recognize that we seek our own will and way, we try to stop the creative advance when it seems to go against our fond desires, we are content to remain in backwaters and deviate into side - channels, we love either imperfectly or in the wrong ways, we wish to over-ride and control others of our kind, we spoil the environment and refuse our proper human stewardship of the natural order.

«What's really at stake here, in the larger significance, is the future of the church,» says Sister Maureen Fiedler of the order of Sisters of Loretto» The church has no future because it is petty and stupid... and because intelligence and an innate sense of what is right and what is wrong is know to all through the few just civilizations that exist... to include the USA.

«Time is the healing river», said W. H. Auden; and there seems to be a way in which the worst of evils, which as evil are not to be welcomed nor valued, can be incorporated into some later ordering which may very well be all the deeper and more significant because it has absorbed and used that which in itself was horribly wrong.

Just as it is gravely wrong to take from individuals what they can accomplish by their own initiative and industry and give it to the community, so also it is an injustice and at the same time a grave evil and disturbance of right order to assign to a greater and higher association what lesser and subordinate organizations can do.

He called upon the Church to «repent of the sins of existing society, cast off the spell of lies protecting our social wrongs, have faith in a higher social order, and realize in ourselves a new type of Christian manhood which seems to overcome the evil in the present world, not by withdrawing from the world, but by revolutionizing it.»

Still, it is not wrong theologically when the synagogue chose to repeat the promise of 66:23 after v. 24 in order to bear testimony that the worship of the one true God by his faithful has the last word.»

It's about your relationship with the one who died on the cross — and if you have a relationship with Him, as it says in the Bible, the Holy Spirit will convict you of what is right and wrong — but in order to have the Holy Spirit, you must seek the only one who is worth seeking.

We are two nations: one concentrated on rights and laws, the other on rights and wrongs; one radically individualistic and dedicated to the actualized self, the other communal and invoking the common good; one viewing law as the instrument of the will to power and license, the other affirming an objective moral order reflected in a Constitution to which we are obliged; one given to private satisfaction, the other to familial responsibility; one typically secular, the other typically religious; one elitist, the other populist.

But it is also wrong to take the privileges and constraints of imperial days as if they were the natural order of things.

But, I certainly agree with you that this whole notion of being «powerless» and somehow turning your life over to a «higher power» is a crutch that they will have to deal with, and when they do relapse, which studies show that almost «all» of them do, again... it is always, that they were wrong in somehow they didn't work the «steps» appropriately, or got the «steps» out of order, or didn't fully turn their lives over to a «higher power», or they didn't go to «enough» meetings, etc...

If a superior officer orders him to do something that he considers morally wrong, if we make use of the principles invoked by the ACOG, the soldier may only disobey the order if there are other soldiers available to carry that order out.

Is it so wrong that at a time when it was conquer or be conquered Muhammad brought order to a state of confusion.

It is an absurd, but nonetheless real, challenge to defend the idea that «true» and «false» exist, that «right» and «wrong» have meaning, that the contours of the natural world have significance, and order, and law.

For which of these two is really convinced that justice exists in the world: the one that suffers wrong for doing the right, or the one that does wrong in order to obtain his right?

At the same time I'm not interested in joining a group of Athiests in order to try to convince believers that they are wrong either.

I mean exactly what I said, no one has ever proved God and or the Bible to be wrong How is the creation week out of order and how do you know at there hasn't been a flood?

The demon of noonday was the imp that appeared in order to test their obedience in faith, to lull them into thinking that maybe their vocation was wrong, and to remind them of air - conditioned comfort in the cities.

Thirdly, we can hardly be wrong in identifying these «orders» to which the apostle refers, as belonging to the regular course of ethical instruction for converts.

There would be no external standards of what is right and wrong, just and unjust, moral and immoral, by which its results could be judged; there would be no guarantee that, even in the absence of outside intervention, globalization would be a benign process; and there would be no assurance that in a free society, left to itself, we could count on an evolution of moral beliefs to generate values which would continue to underpin the market order.19