Sentences with phrase «of wrong teaching»

At our church so many people are confused and worried about loosing their salvation because of wrong teaching about sin and salvation.

Not exact matches

It's a life that has a lot to teach us about the prevailing wisdom of productivity, and why we just may have it all wrong.

We could have avoided a lot of difficulty without that issue, but even without considering market internals, history teaches that the longer value - conscious investors are wrong, the more seriously their views should be taken (remember Roger Babson).

The case method is the antithesis of how entrepreneurs build startups — it teaches pattern recognition tools for the wrong patterns — and therefore has limited value as an entrepreneurship teaching tool.

Many of the theories which were taught as scientific fact have been proved wrong.

I see life fall apart around me and I have no worries for myself — becuase I incorporate those teachings of Jesus in all my friendships and relationships — and I deal with the hard stuff — I take responsibility — I can say I am wrong — and I am accountable for my actions and the values I adopt.

Because gay people are taught from a young age that being gay is wrong and that having feelings for someone of the same sex is queer, they suppress those feelings and (with men especially) those feelings often get expressed through random sex acts with other men.

By the way, Atheists don't need to be told what is right and wrong, we know what is and do follow the «Teachings of Jesus» we just don't believe that there is a God, that is just silly.

Today's society has a basis of right and wrong, which for an older person would associate with basic Christian teachings of loving your neighbor as yourself.

I'm just pointing out that facets of religion are used in many aspects of growing up to teach morality and right from wrong and teach a society behavior.

Two thousand years of Christian teaching do indeed explain all the reasons why life is good, and why killing is wrong.

But IF YOU REALLY BELIEVE Jesus was G - d, and if YOU REALLY BELIEVE that G - d was the author of the «Old Testament»... then WHO has the authority to say that G - d and Jesus were wrong with what they taught?

All religion teaches some form of right and wrong or good or bad philosophy, but, it's the individual who has to choose to do right or wrong or good or bad.

What if He takes His place in history / With all the prophets and the kings / Who taught us love and came in peace / But then the story ends, what then... But what if you're wrong / What if there's more / What if there's hope / You never dreamed of hoping for

In your freedom of community, do I have the right to tell someone they are wrong in what they are teaching?

At the end of our discussion, I still had one question: «All that being said Father, and granting the necessity, beauty, and orthodoxy of the Council's teachings» how did their implementation go so disastrously wrong in the immediate years that followed?»

But there is a different interpretation: that when someone says, «The Church teaches that X is intrinsically wrong,» he is probably being a bit of a Pharisee.

The clear and authoritative teaching of the Catholic Church is that it is always and intrinsically wrong to directly intend to terminate innocent human life.

This article is wrong to take Jesus teachings and apply them to how we as a nation reacted to the death of bin laden.

From the moment I could understand what murder meant, I was taught that it was «wrong» — a relative consensus that seemed to be universal; that came from people of different philosophical backgrounds.

Beware of the liberalist socialist gang... they want everyone to live as they please no laws no wrong... just what makes you «feel» good...ki - lling babies... ok... g - «ay marriage... ok... leg - «alized dr - «ugs... ok... if you want to party get pr - «eg - «nant... ok... just ki - ll it... where do we start to use the Bible or try to follow its teachings?

What is wrong regarding the teachings or facts of Mormonism in the article?

The context of you arguement would be -LCB- tell me if I am wrong -RCB- that it is within the natural order of things that you don't need the Bible to teach morality.

Ah, yes, and this is what happens when people are choosing to do whatever they want to please their fleshly desires, without discerning right, from wrong as taught to us they would do, prophesied in Malachi 3v13 - 15, and is why we have the troubles, and sufferings of today.

Usually, if you disagree with a Calvinist on the meaning of a particular Bible verse, rather than deal with the exegetical evidence that was prevented about the verse, they will say that your understanding is wrong, because it disagrees with what John Calvin, John Piper, or John MacArthur teaches (or some other Calvinist).

I agree that the church keeps people away by teaching wrong doctrine such as hell being a place of everlasting torment - who wants to serve a God like that.

The «ask, seek, knock» teaching, then, is not another miscellaneous saying, but an extension of Jesus» admonition to discern between right and wrong.

I allow myself, by my observer standpoint and scholarly method, to absent myself from any confrontation either in my teaching or in my life with the pressing issues of right and wrong.

But again, homosexual acts are not wrong because of this consistent pattern of teaching; rather, this pattern is consistent precisely because homosexual acts are not friendly to our nature.

I would agree with Hope Griffin, that not all of what you wrote I agree, but, again, the holy spirit in us will teach us how to discern between wrong teaching and a good one, the lie and the truth....

All those claiming the schools and the church was wrong, listen he taught theological courses at a theological school, which by definition means that you have to be a person of faith (not to mention that these are not theological schools at state or public universities but denominational theological schools) and to pastor or counsel a church you again by definition have to be a person of faith.

THIS is the too - high cost of wrong - headed teaching about humankind, most especially about women.

Also in 2007, 52 percent of evangelicals said religious teachings most influence their views of right and wrong, compared to the 2 percent who cited scientific information.

There are reports of OFSTED inspectors demanding that schools impose a weird agenda on children, teaching that it is possible for a boy to become a girl and vice versa, that sexual identity is not something specific, that all our knowledge of biology on this subject has been wrong.

I can teach «religious studies» as though it were a branch of aesthetics, never allowing either myself or my students to be challenged by «the discernment of right and wrong» that is wisdom.

Doubtless much of what is believed and taught about it is wrong or partially wrong.

We know there's something wrong with teaching in our schools when so many students learn only a fraction of what they could.

Let us be clear, according to Vines, the tradition and reliability of the Church's teaching throughout the ages on sexuality are both wrong.

This is an important point, for, while we have often taught what is wrong with homosexuality, why it is a disorder and that «gay sex» is always morally wrong - we have been less effective at proposing the whole, positive vision of sex and love, and also what paths to fulfilment are open to people who experience same - sex attraction.

Or am I contributing to the problem by helping support this institution - one that has some amazing people but are dedicated to teaching students more about how evolution is wrong than in following the call of Jesus to love your enemies.

The chatter around a poll released Wednesday by the Public Religion Research Institute and the Religion News Service will likely focus on the findings highlighted in their news release: 82 % of Americans surveyed believe that bin Laden distorted the teachings of Islam to suit his own purposes; 65 % believe the al Qaeda leader is rotting in hell; and 62 % think it is wrong to celebrate the death of another human being.

Indeed, the history of the faith, and the teachings of Scripture itself, show that Tim Challies is dead wrong on one very important point:

Each one of us must eventually face the real issue, which is quite simply: do I believe after adult examination of the evidence that Jesus Christ was what he claimed to be, or am I prepared to assert quite definitely that he was wrong in his major claims and that, though much of his teaching is beautiful, he himself was a self - deceived fanatic?

Sure, the church you attend... whatever,... but the religion you believe in teaches right from wrong and claims a connection to, or understanding of, or words directly from, the supposed ultimate moral authority does it not?

The first point to acknowledge in considering this view is that the Church has always taught that it is incompatible with an authentic sense of moral responsibility deliberately to choose what is known to be morally wrong, however good and desirable one's further purpose might be.

I don't see anything remotely wrong or uncoufe in this suggestion; to the contrary, I see it taught not only in scripture, but in the VAST majority of texts on human nature.

Scot McKnight was the first person to draw my attention to the fact that «anyone who thinks it is wrong for a woman to teach in a church can be consistent with that point of view only if they refuse to learn from women scholars» (The Blue Parakeet, p. 148).

i will tell you that the one thing that god gave us is the power of will or choice and that is why we can decide to do good or bad or follow him or not but the evidence of a true christian is that person life will change and not is a small way.my people open your eyes and do not be fools to believe that there is no god because you know in your own heart while you say it, deep inside you can see that a god do exist and i do not need to tell you that or prove it to you because you know it is true.unfortunately there are false preachers who do not teach the truth or a halph truth which has led millions down the wrong path and today we see the result of it everywhere.

A better modernist epistemology teaches that we can have knowledge of right and wrong even where we can not have proof, applying concepts like coherency, reflective equilibrium, and inference to the best explanation.

Some of what everyone is taught is likely wrong, maybe all.