Sentences with phrase «of years after»

So yes, I beleive we will se ourself in 5 - 10 place during Wenger and a couple of years after Wenger.

Luckily I came into the UW a couple of years after high school and was married so the level of distractions for me were greatly minimized.

I sincerely hope they make a real movie (with actors and everything) a couple of years after he retires, portraying some real untold stories of what happened behind the scenes.

I used to eat oatmeal for breakfast all of the time, during the first couple of years after I went vegan.

«The beer market has stabilized over the past couple of years after declining between 1 and 2 percent in 2009 - 2011 and then again in 2013,» said Brian Sudano, managing partner with Beverage Marketing Corporation (BMC), New York, in Beverage Industry's March issue.

For hundreds of years after the Aztecs, smoked chiles were found predominantly in the markets of Central and South Mexico, such as Puebla, Oaxaca, Veracruz, and Chiapas.

History has shown that book was written hundreds of years after he died.

My relationship with God a that time was intimate and highly fulfilling, (though quite at odds with what was taught at the churches I attended then), not something I can say of the years after that... but living in economic security I had never been in a place where my kitchen pantry was empty.

The first attempt to even write a bible came hundreds of years after Jesus died.

hundreds of years after they killed Jesus.

the bible was written hundreds of years after christ's death, its full of contradictions, and has no place in today's society.

For starters 1 says» 1) the universe resulted from actions of a 1) in the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth» The earth was not formed until billions of years after the universe «resulted from actions» so you are off right away there.

The entire bible was written close to 400 years after christ — then re-interpreteted into English hundreds of years after that.

The first dramatic missing link came to light in 1861, only a couple of years after Darwin's Origin of Species had been published.

They wrote «the word of God» hundreds of years after the death of Jesus Christ.

The truth is the modern Bible was put together hundreds of years after Jesus lived and died by priests who wanted to put in only those things THEY thought should be read by others according to the culture of the time.

The bible was complied hundreds of years after the supposed fact.

people did, probably hundreds of years after the first arabic tribal leaders made it up.

If there are Christians who think the Bible has taken ANY kind of position on guns — a technology that didn't come along until thousands of years after the BIble was written — they should seek professional mental - health are immediately!

According to Yahoo News, this apparently took place in the al - Rashad region of Iraq near Kirkuk, on a farmland Islamic State fighters have held for a couple of years after kicking the original residents off to a refugee camp.

It's a misinterpretation to apply that warning to the entire Bible because it would by hundreds of years after Revelation was written before the canon was decided, right?

I joined this network a couple of years after leaving the novitiate, and was at first, like many, simultaneously baffled and delighted by its complexity.

All of the paintings of Jesus that are available were painted by people who were alive hundreds of years after Christ's death.

Hundreds of years after that a German printer collected these interpretations into a «book» and called it a Bible (from the Greek word «biblios» for book).

Jesus is Issa, and all the miracles that took place in the Bible were written hundreds of years after Jesus died.

You were dead for billions of years before your birth, you can deal with the billions (at least) of years after your death.

Stephan, Since you wrote this a couple of years after the original post was written, I missed seeing it.

«god» was so responsible in making that «provision» for being «saved» that «he» waited tens of thousands of years after modern man arrived on this planet (dooming countless generations to «hell» because they didn't have a chance), and then on top of that «he» implemented «his» «provision» in the middle of a freakin» desert in a time when there was no Internet and at a time when those ignorant goatherding people thought the world was flat (thereby dooming countless more generations of people to «hell» because there was no way, for example, to even get the message to what would become the Americas 15 centuries later).

By the way, the Hadith are merely contradictory «biographies» of Muhammad written HUNDREDS of years after Muhammad died after being passed down orally for generations.

Arguments based on your version of a book compiled from dozens of sources hundreds of years after the events they claim to relate and for many parts of which contradictory evidence is a «plenty (No historical evidence whatsoever of an Exodus, for example plus we now know the Egyptians did not use a slave - based economy for construction as one example.

You put too much faith in a book written hundreds of years after the «supposed» events my men in power wishing to hold onto it and control the masses.

However, when we look at the book of Ezra — which takes place approximately a thousand years after God spoke to Moses, hundreds of years after many of the Psalms were written, and 400 years before Jesus Christ was born — we see that Zahnd's theory is simply inaccurate, as Israel reinstituted sacrifices to God even before they began reconstructing the temple (Ezra 3).

They were written hundreds of years after the «fact» and were used to control the people of that time.

Life appeared in the universe some billions of years after its origin in the hypothetical «Big Bang.»

The oldest manuscripts we have were written down 100's of years after the last apostle died.

@saganhill You also claim the Bible was written hundreds of years after the authors... but when was that?

You're using a book that is not factual, has no proof other than itself, and was written by men 100's of years after the fact.

A couple of years after her death you found yourself heading to the audition for Britain's Got Talent.

The oldest manuscripts we have were written down hundreds of years after the last «apostle» died?There were over 8,000 of these old manuscripts and no 2 are alike?

True Christians were not permitted to serve in the military or otherwise participate in war or even commit violent acts until the concept of the «just war» — fighting only when doing so was required to protect the innocent against an aggressor — was developed hundreds of years after the death of Christ.

The writers accurate use of common names of the time shows they had access to reliable information about the people and places involved in the history of Jesus and that their writings took place at about the same time as the events (there would have been no way to access information regarding names of that time hundreds of years after the period, remember, no books, no libraries, etc..)

So what you're trying to tell me is that jesus can perform miracles, he did so for a crapload of people, but since it was also thrown into the bible that he can't perform for evil people (or wicked generation or whatever) and since we're all sinners he can't perform miracles so we just have to trust him, actually not him necessarily, a book written by a bunch of people 100's of years after jesus who also weren't seeing miracles done, so they decided that since no more miracles were happening, it's our fault.

All we know about these people comes from people comes from second - hand + accounts, sometimes even hundreds of years after the person's death.

Besides the obvious creation narrative of «6 days» of creation even when adjusted for the «thousand years is as a day» still leaves wildly inaccurate time frames, coupled with the Adam lineage down to Abraham all written thousands of years after the supposed events took place by Moses, set's a definate time frame for how old the earth and most bible scholars proclaim this to be between 6,000 to 9,000 years old.

It's also the same thing as saying that anything in the bible, written hundreds of years after it happened, has any relevance to anyone.

If, on the other hand, it was written hundreds of years after the time of Christ, then I would question the veracity of this fragment.

In fact the majority of the books were written hundreds if not thousands of years after Jesus died.

Sure as heck wasn't English, which didn't exist for hundreds of years after.

Words written in bible represent mind set of a hindu, secular, crook self centered writer hundreds of years after Easu, anointed one, corresponding not to essence of teachings, but plot to justify hindu Mithra ism, pagan savior ism, in violation of spirit of true teachings.

The new testament was written and approved hundreds of years after Christ's death.