Sentences with phrase «offence contrary»

In a Charge No: KB / HC / 27C / 2017, the defendants were accused of committing offences contrary to and punishable under Sections 19 and 26 (1)(c) of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act, 2000.

According to the Crown, this evidence, if accepted, makes out an indictable offence contrary to s. 127 (a) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27, as part of the same transaction erroneously alleged in Count 10.

He is committed to stand trial on the remaining counts, except that Count 9 will allege a fraud committed between May 1st and December 24th, 2003, Count 12 will allege a fraud rather than a theft, and Counts 10 and 11 will charge offences contrary to s. 127 and s. 122 (1)(b) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, respectively, rather than the Criminal Code charges that appear in the information.

Serious issues of breach of privacy and hacking (potential offences contrary to s. 1 Computer Misuse Act 1990) in relation to the collection of evidence.

Singh alleged he was subjected to discrimination in employment on the basis of an unrelated criminal or summary conviction offence contrary to section 13 of the B.C. Human Rights Code.

The defendants were tried on an indictment alleging offences contrary to s 57 of TA 2000, namely of possessing articles for a purpose connected with the commission, preparation or instigation of an act of terrorism.

«This suspension shall be suspended in its entirety for 18 months from 23 October 2015 and will not take effect unless he commits an offence contrary to the agents regulations or The FA's regulations on working with intermediaries during this time.

«That you, Mohammed Babatunde and Abolanle Ogundare, on the same day, did aid, counsel, abet and procure Mutiu Ogundare to fake his kidnap, thereby committing an offence contrary to Section 7 (1) and (2) of the Kidnapping Prohibition 2017, No.

They were also accused of concealing «proceeds of crime» and thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 18 (a) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition)(Amendment) Act, 2012 and punishable under Section 17 (a).

«Also, he did transfers from account Number 0049765878 GT bank account the cash sum of 37,000 via one Egunlola Adewumi Christiana and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under section 390 (9) of the criminal code Cap 34.

Upon his fresh arraignment which took place on 28th December 2016 Fagboyinbo made the court to know that «Adesina Olajide on the 19th of October 2016 at about 12 mid night, at Ofatedo area in Osogbo did break and entered into dwelling house of Egunlola Adewumi Christiana with intent to commit felony and stealing and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under section 411 (1) of the criminal code 34 vol.

On the same day, date and place Olajide did steal the following item: Dell laptop valued N52, 000.00, HP laptop valued N100, 000.00, X - touch phone valued N14, 000, a school bag containing a purse and a GT Bank ATM card and the sum of N30, 000 properties of one Egunlola Adewumi Christian and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under section 383 (1) and punishable under section 390 (9) of the criminal code cap 34 Vol.

Count three: «That you Godsday Peter Orubebe while being a Minister of the Federal Republic of Nigeria in charge of Ministry of Niger Delta Affairs on or about September 19, 2012 asked for and accepted the sum of fifty million naira from one Pastor (Dr) Jonathan Alota, as bribe for the contract awarded in favour of his company, Chemtronics Nigeria Limited and you thereby committed an offence contrary to section 10 of the CCB & T Act, and punishable under Section 23 (2) of CCB & T Act.

The charge read, «That you, Joachim Iroko, aka Joe, and others still at large, on Saturday, August 13, 2016, at about 5.30 pm at the Ketere area, Sango, in the Ota Magisterial District did conduct yourselves in a manner likely to cause breach of the peace, by writing a name, Buhari, on a dog and parading same in the Hausa section of Ketere Market, Sango, thereby, committing an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 249 (d) of the Criminal Law of Ogun State, Nigeria, 2016.»

Sulaiman on his part, was accused of bribing a government official when he paid N5 million through a Guarantee Trust Bank account to Alanamu, as a reward for the award of contract to his company, thereby committing an offence contrary to Section 9 (1)(a) and punishable under Section 9 (1)(b) of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act, 2000.

Sulaiman, on his part, was accused of bribing a government official when he paid N5m to Alanamu as a reward for the award of contract to his company, thereby committing an offence contrary to Section 9 (1)(a) and punishable under Section 9 (1)(b) of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act, 2000.

MT Asteris and the crew members were intercepted by Nigerian Navy Ship Beecroft during a routine operation in the Nigeria waters on March 28, 2015 with 3423.097 Metric Tons of Crude Oil without lawful authority or appropriate license, an offence contrary to Section 1 (19)(6) of the Miscellaneous Offences Act Cap M17, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004 and punishable under Section 17 of the same Act.

In count five and six, FG alleged that Yakubu had with intent to avoid a lawful transaction under the law, transferred at various times in Kaduna, aggregate sums of $ 9,772, 800 and # 74, 000, when he reasonably ought to know that the said funds formed part of the proceed of some form of unlawful activity and thereby committed an offence contrary to section 7 (4)(b)(ii) of the Advance Fee Fraud Act, 2006.

In count three and four of the charge dated March 9 and signed by three EFCC prosecutors led by Prince Ben Ikani, FG, alleged that Yakubu had between 2012 and 2014, without going through a financial institution, received cash payments of $ 9, 772, 800 and # 74, 000, and thereby committed an offence contrary to section 1 of Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act 2012 and punishable under section 16 (2) of the Act.

The charge marked FHC / Abj / CR / 43 / 2017, which was filed before the Federal High Court in Abuja, FG, alleged that Yakubu failed to declare the money in the assets form he filed at the EFCC on August 18, 2015, and thereby committed an offence contrary to section 27 (3)(a) of the EFCC (Establishment) Act 2004 and punishable under section 27 (3)(c) of the same Act.

«The first defendant was found guilty of an offence contrary to sections 1 (a) and 16 (b) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Amended Act, 2012 and punishable under Section 16 (2)(b) of the same Act.

Consequently, the prosecutor argued that the defendants had committed offences contrary to and punishable under Sections 484, 422 and 419 of the Criminal Code, Cap 34, Volume II, laws of Osun state of Nigeria, 2002.

It said that Metuh, by his action, committed an offence contrary to sections 166 and 326 of the Penal Code Act.

It is an offence contrary to Section 1 (1)(a) of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act 2006.

He had said, «Fatai committed an offence contrary to and punishable under sections 283 and 414 of the Criminal Code, Cap 34, vol.

He is accused of stealing N5, 673,503.64 from the Federal Government by creating fictitious accounts for salaries and allowances, using his various aliases, an offence contrary to Section 287 of the Penal Code Act, Laws of Federation 2004.