Sentences with phrase «offence under this section»

Currently, people found guilty of offence under section 55 of the Data Protection Act 1998 for obtaining, disclosing or procuring information without consent are subject to an unlimited fine.

Refusals / failures to provide are serious criminal offences under section 254 (5) of the Criminal Code of Canada.

«We therefore call on the police to confirm that they will prosecute under «hate crime» any individual or group who seeks to intimidate our supporters and candidates or at least under the Public Order offence under Section 4, 4A or 5 of the 1986 Public Order Act,» they added.

Private investigator Jonathan Rees and News of the World journalist Alex Marunchak were arrested for alleged offences under section 3 of the Computer Misuse Act 1990 and sections 1 and 2 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 by police officers working on Operation Kalmyk, part of Operation Tuleta dealing with computer hacking.

(13) Only certain offences may be the subject of a DPA, including offences under section 1, 2, 6 and 7 of the Bribery Act 2010.

2008: Five men cleared by the Appeal Court of offences under Section 57 of the Terrorism Act; judges say that it is not illegal to possess extremist material unless it is used to inspire terrorism.

Impaired driving is a serious criminal offence under section 253 (1)(a) of the Criminal Code of Canada.

To the extent that that had not been done, Mr Anyidoho believes Dr Bawumia's action constitutes a criminal offence under Section 251 of Act 29 of the Criminal Offences Act 1960, hence he intends filing a suit against the former Deputy Governor of the Bank of Ghana.

Jim Devine, MP for Livingston, is charged with two offences under section 17 of the Theft Act 1968 for false accounting.

Scunthorpe MP Elliot Morley has been charged with two offences under section 17 of the Theft Act 1968 for false accounting.

In August 2006, Goodman and Mulcaire were arrested by the Metropolitan Police, and later charged with hacking the telephones of members of the royal family by accessing voicemail messages, an offence under section 79 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000.

The EFCC prosecutor, Mr. Rotimi Oyedepo, told the court that the said conspiracy and indirect retention of the N1.5 bn constituted an offence under Section 18 (a) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition)(Amendment) Act, 2012, and punishable under Section 15 (3)(4) of the same Act.

«Section 16 (2)(b) of the Act provides as follows: A person who commits an offence under Section subsection 1 paragraph A is liable, on conviction, to imprisonment or a prison term not less than two years or a fine of not less than N10m... The provisions of Section 16 (2)(b) is clear and unambiguous... It is for the above reason that I find the proposal in paragraph of the plea bargain agreement, filed on 5th April, 2017, inadequate.»

The EFCC prosecutor, Mr. Rotimi Oyedepo, told the court that the said conspiracy and indirect retention of the N1.5 bn constituted an offence under Section 18 (a) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition)(Amendment) Act, 2012, punishable under Section 15 (3)(4) of the same Act.

Punishment (3) Every one who commits an offence under this section is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years.

One, the ICO has clarified in their letter to the UEA that there was only prima facie evidence of an offence under section 77.

Offence under section 77 is destruction of data under a FOIA request (Jones» infamous email about deleting the AR4 emails).

Given that this was in the public domain and has been discussed in the media and on various websites over a number of weeks, the ICO's view, as I indicated when we spoke yesterday, is that the University must have understood that the question whether an offence under section 77 had been committed would be looked at.

The very making of that agreement is an offence under section 45.

It is worth pointing out that a person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum, or both, and on conviction on indictment to a fine or imprisonment not exceeding ten years, or both.

The first important matter was that this was not an appeal from any decided case, but from a decision on the interpretation of whether something could be a criminal offence under section 92 of the Trade Marks Act 1994.

The current version of s. 163.1 (6) states: «No person shall be convicted of an offence under this section if the act that is alleged to constitute the offence (a) has a legitimate purpose related to the administration of justice or to science, medicine, education or art; and (b) does not pose an undue risk of harm to persons under the age of eighteen years.»

A person will only be guilty of an offence under this section if he was aware of the existence of the order at the time of the conduct complained of.

A person can be guilty of an offence under this section when he was «aware of the existence of the order».

Generally, no person shall be convicted of an offence under section 163.1 of the Criminal Code if the act that is alleged to constitute the offence has a legitimate purpose related to the administration of justice or to science, medicine, education or art; and does not pose an undue risk of harm to persons under the age of eighteen years.

It is relevant if the content was purchased because Section 163.1 (4.3) states that it is an aggravating factor for a person convicted of an offence under Section 163 to have committed the offence with an intent to make a profit.

Making sexually explicit material available to a child is a criminal offence under Section 171.1 of the Criminal Code.

Transmitting, making available or distributing child pornography is a criminal offence under Section 163.1 (3) of the Criminal Code.

Possession of child pornography is a criminal offence under Section 163 (4) of the Criminal Code.

Making, printing and publishing or possessing child pornography for the purposes of publication is a criminal offence under Section 163.1 (2) of the Criminal Code.

Luring a child is a criminal offence under Section 172.1 of the Criminal Code.

(2) Every corporation convicted of an offence under section 186, other than an offence described in subsection (3), is liable,

(2) It is a defence for a person charged with an offence under this section to prove that his possession of the article was not for a purpose connected with the commission, preparation or instigation of an act of terrorism.»

(c) uses or causes to be used, directly or indirectly, a computer system with intent to commit an offence under paragraph (a) or (b) or an offence under section 430 in relation to data or a computer system, or

Careless driving is also sometimes referred to as «reckless driving» and is an offence under Section 130 of Ontario's Highway Traffic Act («HTA»).

The Serious Fraud Office («SFO») confirmed in December 2015 that the Sweett Group («Sweett») had admitted an offence under Section 7 of the Bribery Act 2010 regarding conduct in the Middle East.

Careless driving is also sometimes referred to as «reckless driving» and is an offence under Section 130 of Ontario ’s

(1) A person is guilty of an offence if he makes, adapts, supplies or offers to supply any article intending it to be used to commit, or to assist in the commission of, an offence under section 1 or 3.

(3) A person is guilty of an offence if he obtains any article with a view to its being supplied for use to commit, or to assist in the commission of, an offence under section 1 or 3.

(2) A person is guilty of an offence if he supplies or offers to supply any article believing that it is likely to be used to commit, or to assist in the commission of, an offence under section 1 or 3.