Sentences with phrase «offended by question»

I do have a sense of humor and would never get offended by question: do you hate me?

I suppose I should probably be slightly offended by this question, but it has been asked so many times, that it doesn't have the same sting.

For the citizens of Boring, well, they're not offended by the question; they're used to it — and they take it with humor, because most of them like their town just the way it is!

Honestly I was offended by her question and proudly said, «No I love it.»

It really varied from one school to the next, so I learned to be prepared to defend my decision and not show any signs of being offended by the question which, on one occasion, was put as bluntly as?

However, I found that if I seemed offended by the question, the children would be hurt and distant for the rest of the day.

I am offended by the question itself, as if the common peasants who watch this team have the right to question me, the Lord of Emirates and Grand Potentate of Hornsey Road.

Please try not to be offended by my question, that's not my purpose.

Dear Believer, don't be offended by the question; Sex is Good.

And at least never be offended by the question.

and if a person is so offended by the question that they refuse to answer as logically as they did earlier, the interviewer may determine that this person is too easily shaken for a particular role.

We hope that you enjoyed our study, and that you weren't offended by our questions.

We apologize if you were offended by our questions.

You are not being a nuisance, and a good veterinarian will not be offended by your questions (none of us are perfect, as I explain in chapter 4).

Not exact matches

Especially with matters of business, I'm never afraid that people won't want to talk back to me about what they're up to, or that I might offend them by asking such questions.

[sic] I've already offended some folks by asking the wrong questions.

Why would anyone be offended by having their Christiandom questioned?

The fundamental question is «Why would people be offended by this?»

My question to the people offended by the hate speech is this:

This is to reach out to people who question their faith, not to antagonize, and if you are offended by the sign, well, quite frankly, you're a tool.

Those who are offended by the claim that horses or chimps or whales (OFD; also see OOTM 13, WM 49) deserve more respect than the fetus in the early stages of pregnancy usually resort to a type of question - begging which Peter Singer calls «speciesism»: the human fetus in the early stages of pregnancy deserves moral respect just because it is human.

Frankly, if you do get offended by it, I would want nothing to do with you, have little respect for you, and I would seriously question what kind of person you were to be so «offended» by an act of kindness and compassion.

Why do you feel offended by such questions that you answer in that manner?

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

And really, the question is not so much if people are offended by the breast but more so the actual act.

I don't get offended by things like this because black people (girls) look at me all the time but I don't get offended because I want them to come up to me and ask me question.

He may offend and upset snooty and cranky villagers, by questioning their physical fitness and age.

There are also those who, threatened and offended by the notion of programs like New Leaders, question the fundamental legitimacy of bringing in outsiders.

We are offended by the lack of respect shown to parents who have been kept in the dark by the federal and state officials about all the testing that is taking place and we demand immediate and specific answers to basic questions.

I see that you're also a software developer and that's probably why you were so offended by the way i asked this question.

An honest, responsible breeder will appreciate your concern and won't be offended by any of the following questions:

If you are offended by something you viewed, contact the network that aired the program or the publisher of the film in question.

I've learned to not be offended by such questions, but use the ice breaker as a way to take the conversation to the next level.

These are the usual characteristics of getting a job as house sitter, and you should not be offended by the background checks or inappropriate questions, because this is only the only way you can get the job you want.