Sentences with phrase «offense at these questions»

Former State Sen. Romero takes offense at the question of whether the trigger law is inherently divisive.

If you take offense at these questions then you clearly are not suited to own a pedigree dog.

Not exact matches

So, while I might be reading too much into Cable's opinion that Lynch will have to «adapt» to how the offense «acts» while referencing their new - found «maturity,» it does call into question in my mind whether Lynch will be back at all.

Biggest question mark: The offensive line has to replace basically 3.5 starters, a scary thought for an offense that was really good at not moving backward last year.

Biggest question mark: The offense has been remarkably impressive at replacing departed stars with even bigger stars.

While I don't know all of the context of the people responding to JoAnne's questions (or generally taking offense with her questions), I suspect that the folks most upset are the most sensitive or vulnerable about the subject matter and aren't we all at times, feeling very sensitive?

At present, the NYPD and the New York City Department of Corrections do not honor ICE requests to hold individuals in custody unless the person in question has committed a violent offense.

Suffolk legislative Democrats and allies cited county correction lieutenant and Conservative Party chairman Edward Walsh's past legal issues, including sentencing on a misdemeanor sex offense, in questioning how he could become a high - ranking official at the county jail.

Suffolk legislative Democrats and allies Thursday cited county correction lieutenant and Conservative Party chairman Edward Walsh's past legal issues, including sentencing on a misdemeanor sex offense, in questioning how he could become a high - ranking official at the county jail.

For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery;... Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.»

No offense, but you still haven't answered the question, though at least you tried.

The case is Dillon v. United States, and at issue is the question of whether the federal sentencing guidelines are binding or only advisory when defendants who were originally sentenced before the decision in United States v. Booker are resentenced pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582 (c)(2), after the guidelines applicable to the offense in question are changed.

Article VIII of the Protocol provides that its provisions shall apply to any offense committed, any request made or any person found extraditable before or after the entry into force of the Protocol, but shall not apply to an offense committed before the Protocol enters into force if the offense in question was not an offense under the laws of both Contracting Parties at the time of its commission.

John Pollock: It's a trick question I appreciate, because it goes right to our main message, which is, when a court has a person who hasn't paid a traffic offense, the reason that they are permitted to put someone in jail is because if they can actually demonstrate, if they can actually believe that, that person has the money and is just choosing not to pay it, they can put them in prison because at that point, they're trying to coerce them.