Sentences with phrase «offensive sides in»

So far we have completely dominated two of the least offensive sides in the competition but failed to score.

Not exact matches

In total, Gifford found the end zone 77 times on the offensive side of the football.
Which explains why Reddit is often associated less with news and more with unruly or even offensive content such as the GamerGate controversy, or even worse examples of the darker side of human behavior that have appeared there in recent years.
In the meantime, both quarterbacks, both special teams, both offensive and defensive lines, and both coaches are taking the other side of your bet.
And it almost sounds as offensive as an outsider saying, in effect, look on the bright side.
This shouldn't be about people — a lot of people can be wrong in their theology (and I think to a certain degree we all are still learning)-- can't we talk about theology without it being offensive to either side?
when naked women adorn the sides of busses for adverts but my dau in law is offensive for feeding her kid?
«These tools give us an opportunity to be on the offensive side of trends that are going on in the marketplace to ensure that our retailer, distributor and manufacturer partners continue to win,» Alderson adds.
And in all, this league has improved by quite a bit on the offensive side of the ball.
The Jaguars may have made Andrew Norwell the highest paid guard in the NFL, but they could still use a guard on the right side of the offensive line.
Henrikh has now moved to admit that he can only give his best when in an offensive team, and even compared his previous stint under Jurgen Klopp at Borussia Dortmund to that of his current side.
A few key contributors really struggled on the offensive side of the ball as their leading scorer and the leagues second leading scorer, Sterling Williams, was only able to muster 12 points against a very stingy Team Harlander D. Michael Halusek was able to put up 17 points while Chris Hicks chipped in with 10, unfortunately that just wasn't enough to get them past a very determined Team Harlander.
On the other side, Louisville has jumped out to an 18 - 5 record behind a balanced offensive attack in which 4 players» average double - figures with two others on the cusp.
It's always hard to get movement without a double team, and the defensive line and offensive line are 2 - on - 2 on the weak side in under fronts.
It seems there is much more to be had on the offensive side of the ball in FA.
After seeing his side struggle for goals last season following the departure of Luis Suarez to Barcelona in the summer of 2014 and the various injuries suffered by Daniel Sturridge throughout the campaign, Rodgers has set about rectifying his offensive deficiencies.
Stuff like smoke screens (WR takes one step forward then one step back to catch the ball while his blockers lead up in front of him), or really any kind of screens, counter plays (where you pull the offensive guard and tackle from one side of the center to the other side of the center) and any number of sweep plays (runs designed to get wide outside of the offensive tackle).
That said, it's been the offensive side of the ball that's been making the headlines in Seattle recently.
The player is understood to want # 300,000 - per - week post-tax, although following his sterling year in France, he well may be worth the outlay for a Red Devils side currently lacking character and offensive menace.
Last season he was mostly a stud tight end, meaning he was usually beside an offensive tackle on either side, but I also could see the Ravens expanding his role some this season in an effort to get him the ball more out in space where he can put that running ability to even better use.
Clearly there will always be awkwardness on the offensive side of the ball in these pairings, but I'm suddenly more encouraged that he could really play that defensive «4» to amazing success (especially given who will be having his back in the paint).
Switching to the offensive side of the ball, I think whenever quarterbacks go one and two overall in the draft, it's hard to imagine one of them not coming home with the award.
No matter the side, that offensive tackle's ass was in trouble if he saw Spence lined up across from him and he wasn't getting any help.
They are also good at simultaneously using their footwork to side step that offensive lineman and leave him standing in the same spot stuck on stupid.
(Revis took the motion receiver, Doug Baldwin, to the offensive left side of the formation, leaving a 6 - 4, 221 - pound corner, Browner, and the green Butler to defend the stack flanked right — Kearse in front and Lockette behind him.)
Wenger does seem to be launching a charm offensive to try and get the fans back on his side before the new season, and to get a few top - class players in early will go a long way to achieving that goal.
Florida's offensive woes are well - documented, and the Gators» plight is the flip side of the other three squads»: they have wins, but look bad; Boise State (best win: Fresno State), Oregon State (best win: UCLA in Week 4), and Florida State (best win: Clemson) all have little to recommend them beyond brand name and play against overmatched teams.
In addition to the offensive side of his game, Santi was also seen getting on the end of loose passes, making tackles and even tracking midfield runners during Burnley attacks.
The fact he is able to hit high numbers in juniors just confirms he isn't a slouch on the offensive side.
Him being hurt in the first quarter and playing one down after that undoubtedly had an impact on the offensive side of the ball for the Steelers.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Separately, on the offensive side of the ball I have no idea what we're doing, or any confidence that anybody in charge knows either.
defensive players from the ACC projected in the first round, but just two on the offensive side of the ball.
We still can't happy now cos we have to see how we perform in the EPL but since wilshere won't be starting any game soon so I think we are ok now in our offensive side but defensive will be in trouble.
I like the insurance side of things, but I personally feel plugging the hole in OLine dramatically changes our offensive performance and could be the largest factor in helping Dak perform.
With the offensive line sliding to the left tackle's side and then filling in the right with McGowan plus an RB, there's no soft spot for the defense to attack.
Indeed, Louis van Gaal has taken negligible steps to recruit potential problem - solvers for his flagging reign, despite his side's palpable lack of offensive cohesion or menace in offensive areas.
Purdue replaced head coach Darrell Hazell with Jeff Brohm, whose innovative offensive mind helped boost that side of the ball as the defense held its own in Big Ten play.
Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste
Now that it appears that we got our defensive woes in shape, I want to turn our attention to the offensive side.
The single most surprising tidbit I could find about Kansas this year actually comes on the offensive side of the ball: they are, somehow, ranked 11th in Off.
He's lined up in trips on the right side of the Vikings» offensive formation with tight end Kyle Rudolph and wide receiver Jarius Wright.
The line play on the offensive side of the ball could also be in jeopardy for the Chargers, as LT Russell Okung (groin, questionable) and RT Joe Barksdale (hip, questionable) could join TE Hunter Henry (kidney, IR) on the bench.
There are some serious threats on the offensive side of the ball especially when they add Barkley in the mix.
Ozil needs to be played more centrally if we hope to benefit from his creativity with the ball and Welbeck's first touch is far too sloppy to be played along side Lacazette... we need to find a formation which allows more service to those making runs from the middle of the pitch... Lacazette can not play so much with his back to goal or we're simply playing the same unsuccessful offensive scheme we played with Giroud, who is much better in that type of role... I can only hope we keep Sanchez and purchase a true defensive midfielder then switch to a 4 -4-1-1, which allows us to have Ozil play more centrally with Sead and Sanchez on the left side and Ox and Bellerin on the right, which would stretch defences so much that we could overwhelm most opponents with both runs in behind and overlapping runs out wide
It seems in general that bettors have a lot more faith in defenses rather than offenses, perhaps expecting more rust on the offensive side.
6) Team Apuli (Giordano's)-- Currently in 4th with 62 points (Last Week: 2)-- They were on the wrong side of Team Watts offensive explosion on Monday.
Three years ago, the former Sacramento State All - American offensive linemen knew there was an untapped number of talented linemen on both sides of the ball in the Sacramento area that were not getting the proper training in the offseason.
Bournemouth brought both Christian Atsu and Max Gradel to the club during the summer in a bid to add more offensive menace to the side, but the former has returned to Chelsea after struggling with injury according to the club's official website, while the latter tore his cruciate knee ligament at the beginning of the campaign [Daily Mail] and is yet to return to full fitness.
I'm happy for Monreal though, because he is one of the few players who tries hard every game and the new formation is giving him more in terms of his offensive side of play.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z