Citators
offered by commercial publishers are more complete and much more sophisticated; they include information about subsequent judicial treatment of cases.
The currency of the legislation on government websites is being improved and enhancements such as «point in time» are being copied by governments, eliminating advantages previously
offered by the commercial publishers.
Not exact matches
Publishers aren't willing to
offer fair enough contracts, or decent royatlies, or advertising etc... and they are losing the
commercial writers
by the bucketload.
There are also plenty who start out as self - published, before being talent - spotted
by commercial publishers keen to
offer them contracts.
In a jurisdiction that has prided itself on the importance of «doctrine» in interpreting the law, the fact that the major French language university opts for content with the lowest common denominator, while a foreign owned
commercial publisher offers an authoritative work
by leading academics and legal practitioners, is a remarkable case of role reversal, as well as a reflection on how times have changed.
As such was it intended merely to duplicate the services
offered by the
commercial legal
publishers.
Similar citation linking tools have been
offered by commercial legal
publishers.
In the past it has been
offered almost exclusively
by commercial publishers, but now it is brought to the public
by the same body that is proposing to make factums accessible; can we keep one and exclude the other?