There is a strong and growing body of evidence that
offering special education vouchers to disabled students would be desirable public policy.
Not exact matches
Greene and Buck note that in Florida, where the McKay Scholarship for Students with Disabilities program has
offered vouchers to disabled students since 1999,
vouchers allow nearly 7 percent of
special education students to be educated in private schools at public expense, six times the national average for private placement.
Measures on knotty issues expected to be the heart of the Individuals with Disabilities Act revision — reducing paperwork related to the law, disciplining
special education students, «fully funding» the law, and
offering a
voucher program for students with disabilities — will...
And, the final US Department of
Education report on the Washington, DC
voucher program showed that a main reason why students didn't use a
voucher offered to them was that they were unable to find a participating school with services for their learning or physical disability or other
special needs.
Prior to the adoption of the
special needs scholarship, Georgia already
offered no less than 11 scholarship, grant or
voucher programs related to the care and
education of its young people.
For example, the final Department of
Education report on the D.C.
voucher showed that one of the main reasons why students didn't use a
voucher offered to them was that they were unable to find a participating school that
offered services for their learning or physical disability or other
special needs.
While private schools that receive
vouchers through the program can not discriminate against students with disabilities, they are also not required to
offer special education services beyond those that can be provided with «minor adjustments» to their educational program.2 This means that schools can deny admission outright to students such as Trinity if their needs are considered too severe.