Not exact matches
[74] The decision of the review
officer or panel
is subject to judicial review, but not
to appeal.
«[T] he weight of authority suggests that accurate news reporting — even when it
is likely
to have an adverse impact on the
subjects of the report — usually does not give rise
to an action for intentional infliction of emotional distress»: Yesterday, a unanimous three - judge panel of the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Tenth Circuit issued a decision affirming a federal district court's dismissal of claims for invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress asserted by two former undercover police
officers against a television station in Albuquerque that had revealed their identities and their undercover status in the context of a televised report about their suspected involvement in an alleged incident of sexual assault.
(3) Where the
appeal is limited, the judge who conducted the recount shall forward, in the envelope as provided for in subsection 75 (1), the ballots that
are the
subject of
appeal together with the notice and a certificate showing the judge's findings as
to the ballots in dispute, by registered mail
to a local registrar of the Superior Court of Justice, but, if the
appeal is not limited, the judge shall forward all the ballots and other papers
to the local registrar, and in either case the judge shall await the result of the
appeal before sending his or her certificate
to the returning
officer.
(6) At the time appointed, the judge of the Superior Court of Justice shall recount the ballots or such of them as
are the
subject of
appeal, and shall forthwith certify his or her decision
to the judge who conducted the recount, whose duty it
is to conform
to the decision and
to certify the result without delay
to the returning
officer.