INTRODUCTION Are police
officers obligated to facilitate an accused's right to counsel via a cell phone?
Not exact matches
In an interview with CBC News, Health Canada media relations
officer Christelle Legault outlines that diaper manufacturers are self - regulating and are not
obligated by law to disclose the component parts of their diapers; «it is the responsibility of the [diaper] industry to test their products and take other measures as appropriate to ensure that they meet health and safety requirements.
Indeed, more than a year has passed since Mr. Reynoso and Bronx Councilman Ritchie Torres put up a pair of bills jointly called «The Right to Know Act,» which would
obligate police
officers to identify themselves before performing a search without a warrant, and to inform civilians of their constitutional right to refuse to comply.
In particular, Eddie Adams» Viet Cong
Officer Executed (1968) is an iconic image whose status may actually
obligate visitors to visually study it in order to know it more thoroughly than our cultural memory has allowed us to.
In particular, Eddie Adam's Viet Cong
Officer Executed (1968) is an iconic image whose status may actually
obligate visitors to visually study it in order to know it more thoroughly than our cultural memory has allowed us to.
If a police
officer gives me an order, how can I tell whether or not I'm legally
obligated to follow that order?
«What will clean up the system is if prosecutors themselves are
obligated to find favorable evidence and disclose it, and police
officers will be sanctioned — or certainly sued — if they fail to disclose it,» Scheck says.
Police
officers are
obligated to protect your civil rights — both before and after an arrest and even after a conviction.
This article argues that police
officers should not be constitutionally
obligated to allow detained or arrested persons to use their own cell phones to contact counsel from a police car for three reasons.
Examples of justifiable delays include (i) sufficiently grave medical emergencies that render communication unfeasible; (ii) insufficient privacy; (iii) availability of a telephone (and
officers are not
obligated to provide theirs for safety and privacy reasons); (iv) dangerous circumstances that prevent immediate contact with counsel; and (v) public safety concerns.
The question is: does accepting the assignment to protect the school legally
obligate the
officer to interfere?
It appears that police
officers are not
obligated to permit the accused to use his own cell phone (a specific telephone) to contact counsel.
Imposing reasonableness as a constraint would not be necessary if police
officers were
obligated to allow the accused to immediately contact counsel.
A voting member of the 501 (c)(3) could sue the 501 (c)(3) in state court to insist that the 501 (c)(3) conduct its business in accordance with the Johnson Act because it is legally
obligated to do so and other
officers or directors have ignored that obligation which they have as a matter of state corporate law.
The Executive
Officer of the D.C. Superior Court responded by letter to an inquiry from the Chair of the D.C. Council's Judiciary Committee that «the act does not specify who has the obligation of raising the issue of domestic violence, and does not
obligate the court to raise the issue sua sponte.»