There is substantial legal authority for the conclusion that Judges ethics regarding
official judicial duties can only be reviewed by the Judicial Conduct Commission.
Not exact matches
«That you, Bala A. Mohammed, while being the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, sometime in 2014 in Abuja within the
Judicial Division of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory did accept gratification of a house worth N550, 000,000 (Five Hundred and Fifty Million Naira) only situated at No. 2599 & 2600 Cadastral Zone A04 Asokoro District, Abuja from Aso Savings & Loans Plc as reward for performing your
official duties and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 18 (b) of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act 2000 and punishable under Section 18 (d) of the same Act.»
When this court reverses the judgment, they overrule both the legislative and
judicial authority of the state, without regard to the character or standing, political or
judicial, of the individual members of either department; surely, then, it is our most solemn
duty, not to found our judgment on the opinions of those who assume to decide on the validity of state laws, without any
official power, sanction or responsibility.
It must be admitted that
judicial correction of arbitrary refusal by administrators to perform
official duties under valid laws is exulcerating and costly.
(B) A judge shall not, in the performance of
judicial duties, by words or conduct manifest bias or prejudice, or engage in harassment, and shall not permit court staff, court
officials, or others subject to the judge's direction and control to do so.
[3] Prompt disposition of the court's business requires a judge to devote adequate time to
judicial duties, to be punctual in attending court and expeditious in determining matters under submission, and to take reasonable measures to ensure that court
officials, litigants, and their lawyers cooperate with the judge to that end.