Sentences with phrase «official position on climate change»

ACS, in fact, has an official position on climate change, which is easy to find under the «Policy» section of www.acs.org.

This is quite different from the INQUA official position on climate change, which opens by saying (emphasis added):

Not exact matches

Graham's campaign did not respond to a request for comment about his official campaign position on climate change.

Through relentless pressure on the media to present the issue «objectively,» and by challenging the consensus on climate change science by misstating both the nature of what «consensus» means and what this particular consensus is, ExxonMobil and its allies have confused the public and given cover to a few senior elected and appointed government officials whose positions and opinions enable them to damage U.S. credibility abroad.

Hansen was never muzzled even though he violated NASA» s official agency position on climate forecasting (i.e., we did not know enough to forecast climate change or mankind» s effect on it).

On his official campaign website, Trump does not have a section focused on climate change listed under «Positions.&raquOn his official campaign website, Trump does not have a section focused on climate change listed under «Positions.&raquon climate change listed under «Positions.»

In my view it was problematic from day one that CEQ officials, whose essential job was to advance the President's policy and political position on global climate change, were at the table participating directly in the governance of the Climate Change Science Program and shaping its communication of climate change reclimate change, were at the table participating directly in the governance of the Climate Change Science Program and shaping its communication of climate change reschange, were at the table participating directly in the governance of the Climate Change Science Program and shaping its communication of climate change reClimate Change Science Program and shaping its communication of climate change resChange Science Program and shaping its communication of climate change reclimate change reschange research.

It is NOT about whether or no «skeptics» have used «bad practices» (i.e. «hide the decline» methods) to support their various objections to the «official» IPCC «mainstream position» on climate change.

Australia's official position at the international climate change talks is to have a range of ambition from a 5 per cent reduction in 1990 emissions by 2020, out to 25 per cent, depending on what other countries do.

(Being from Houston, I kind of follow the official positions of the major oil and gas companies on climate change; and you'd actually be surprised how frank many oil companies are.

The onus is now on Dominion to explain, and ideally sever, any ties the company has to the Thomas Jefferson Institute, a group that has long communicated harmful views on climate change — views that do not seem to align with Dominion's official positions on this urgent issue.

By Ben Webster Britain's premier scientific institution is being forced to review its statements on climate change after a rebellion by members who question mankind's contribution to rising temperatures.The Royal Society has appointed a panel to rewrite the 350 - year - old institution's official position on global warming.

It's not clear how much longer so many prominent Republican Party officials can hold contrary positions on climate change.

Just for one prominent example, when NOAA and / or NASA cite 2014 as being the hottest year on record, in a context of stating their official positions concerning climate change — as were 1998, 2005, and 2010 similarly cited — then for purposes of verifying the AR5 model ensemble, what they are really saying is that the trend of peak hottest years is what matters most to them as climate scientists, not the central trend of observed temperatures.

Even before Indiana's top enforcer of federal and state environmental regulations was advising coal companies on how to continuing polluting our air and water, it appears that denial of basic climate science is the state's official position on global warming — Indiana's 2011 «State of the Environment» report rehashes tired climate denier arguments such as global temperature records having «no appreciable change since about 1998.»

The Farm Bureau does not share the scientific opinion on climate change, with its official position being that «there is no generally agreed upon scientific assessment of the exact impact or extent of carbon emissions from human activities, their impact on past decades of warming or how they will affect future climate changes.»