Sentences with phrase «offset crash tests»

Frontal offset crash tests conducted by IIHS since 1995 have prompted huge improvements in how vehicles protect people in frontal crashes.

The Institute's frontal crashworthiness evaluations are based on results of frontal offset crash tests at 40 mph.

The Mazda 3 is the best performer and the Kia Spectra is the worst in a recent series of frontal offset crash tests.

The Institute's frontal crashworthiness evaluations are based on results of 40 mph frontal offset crash tests.

ARLINGTON, Va. — A recent series of frontal offset crash tests by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety included three new small car designs — Subaru Impreza, Mitsubishi Lancer, and Volvo S40 — plus a newly designed large pickup, the Dodge Ram, and a new minivan, the Kia Sedona.

Among seven midsize inexpensive four - door cars recently subjected to 40 mph frontal offset crash tests, only one earns a good overall evaluation for crashworthiness.

A recent series of frontal offset crash tests included three new small car designs — Subaru Impreza, Mitsubishi Lancer and Volvo S40 — plus a newly designed large pickup, the Dodge Ram, and a new minivan, the Kia Sedona.

New car designs are performing much better than their predecessors in 40 mph frontal offset crash tests.

In recent frontal offset crash tests of four small sport utility vehicles, three earned the top crashworthiness rating.

The 2004 - 2008 Acura TL also received «Good» overall rating in the frontal offset crash tests performed by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's (IIHS).

Vehicle ratings (see attachment) reflect performance in 40 mph frontal offset crash tests into a deformable barrier.

The Institute's crashworthiness evaluations are based on results of frontal offset crash tests at 40 mph.

A recent series of frontal offset crash tests included three SUVs — the Volvo XC90, Honda Element and Mitsubishi Outlander — plus three large luxury cars — the 2002 Acura RL, 2003 Cadillac CTS and 2003 Infiniti Q45.

In recent frontal offset crash tests of new or redesigned small and midsize cars, every vehicle received the top rating of good and earned a «best pick» designation.

In frontal offset crash tests of nine new or redesigned 2002 model midsize cars, every car earned the top crashworthiness rating of good.

Five of six new or redesigned midsize cars have earned good ratings in 40 mph frontal offset crash tests.

The researchers compared injury data reported from real crashes with results of both the Institute's frontal offset crash tests and the federal government's full - front tests.

The Institute also conducts 40 mph frontal offset crash tests and evaluates vehicles» seat / head restraint designs for protection in rear crashes.

Frontal crashworthiness evaluations are based on results of frontal offset crash tests at 40 mph.

Research shows that drivers of vehicles that earn good ratings in frontal offset crash tests have significantly lower risk of fatal injuries in real - world frontal crashes, compared with drivers of vehicles with poor ratings.

ARLINGTON, Va. — Frontal offset crash tests conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety since 1995 have prompted huge improvements in how vehicles protect people in frontal crashes.

The Chevrolet Matiz Creative was given Grade 1 in frontal offset crash tests conducted by Korea Insurance Development Institute (KIDI).

ARLINGTON, Va. — New car designs are performing much better than their predecessors in 40 mph frontal offset crash tests.

ARLINGTON, Va. — In a recent series of frontal offset crash tests by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, all seven new or redesigned vehicles earned the top rating of good.

Safety was an issue; the Sunfire performed poorly in side - impact and frontal - offset crash tests.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has evaluated the crashworthiness of the CTS in two 40 mph frontal offset crash tests into deformable barriers.

-- The Vitara Brezza meets side impact and offset crash tests regulations — The vehicle was involved in an accident but withstood the crash — The compact SUV was recently launched and has seen a good response

The Vitara Brezza complies with side impact and offset crash tests set by the Bharat New Vehicle Safety Assessment Programme (BNVSAP).

For eight years the Institute has been providing comparative rankings of passenger vehicles based on performance in frontal offset crash tests at 40 mph.

Comparison of Mitsubishi Galant models: 1995, 1999, 2004 Measured intrusion (cm) in 40 mph frontal offset crash tests

In the frontal offset crash tests performed by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), the 2003 - 2007 Honda Accord received «Good» overall rating.

Safety The Ford Focus received a Good overall rating — the highest possible score — in the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's frontal - offset crash test.

Safety The Toyota Corolla received a Good overall rating in the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's frontal - offset crash test.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has evaluated the crashworthiness of a Maxima with the structural and airbag modifications in a 40 mph frontal offset crash test into a deformable barrier.

The frontal offset crash test ratings also apply to the Lexus ES 350, the midsize luxury / near luxury version of the Camry, beginning with 2007 models and continuing through the 2012 models, which were not redesigned.

Safety ratings on the 2012 Chevy Colorado are mixed, with a top level «Good» rating from the International Institute of Highway Safety on frontal offset crash testing, but a «Marginal» rating on rear crash protection.

The Subaru Forester is the only one of the 12 small SUVs to earn a good rating in not only the side impact crashworthiness evaluation but also the Institute's frontal offset crash test.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has evaluated the crashworthiness of a 1999 ML 320 with the structural changes in a 40 mph frontal offset crash test into a deformable barrier.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has evaluated the crashworthiness of a GS 400 with the structural changes in a 40 mph frontal offset crash test into a deformable barrier.

It received the second - worst rating of «Marginal» in the Institute's small - overlap frontal - offset crash test.

In the frontal offset crash test where it scored 14.93 out of maximum 16 points, head and neck protection of front seat occupants was rated as good and protection of their legs and chest area was termed as acceptable.

The Institute's frontal crashworthiness evaluation is based on results of a 40 mph frontal offset crash test.

The Institute's crashworthiness evaluations are based primarily on results of the frontal offset crash test at 40 mph.

However, the safety issues of the Montana were addressed with the newer Montana SV6, which earned the highest rating of «Good» given by the Insurance Institute in the frontal offset crash test.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety gave the Colorado crew cab its highest possible rating of «Good» in its moderate - overlap frontal - offset crash test, the only test conducted as of this writing.

The frontal crashworthiness rating is based on results of a 40 mph frontal offset crash test.

In Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) crash tests the Vue receives a Good overall rating in the frontal offset crash test.

In the offset crash test, the Exora scored 10.55 out of 16 points — driver chest protection was acceptable and leg protection was marginal.

The frontal offset crash test ratings also apply to the station wagon version of the A4, known as the A4 Avant, beginning with 2002 models manufactured after February 2002.

Studies of frontal crashes have shown similar results: Drivers of vehicles with good ratings in the Institute's frontal offset crash test are much less likely to die in frontal crashes.