Not exact matches
The five - year program, launched by the federal government in early January, proposes to
make over 90 percent of the total U.S.
offshore acreage available to
oil and gas
drilling.
Additionally, it comes at a time when
oil prices are on the rise, but stuck in a range that
makes multibillion - dollar projects in new
offshore areas unattractive for many
drillers.
The resulting climate change is part of what
makes drilling for
oil offshore in the unfreezing Arctic possible, just as it has opened once mythical shipping routes such as the Northwest and Northeast Passages.
Man -
made sounds such as
offshore drilling, seismic testing for deep sea
oil, and even the hum from that Spanish cargo ship permeate the ocean at ever - increasing levels.
Kaufman dismisses as «nonsense» any promises that
offshore drilling could
make the U.S. «
oil independent.»
This ignorance leads to radio ads decrying NIMBYism as the only reason for disallowing
offshore drilling, even while these rich landowners still don't allow any wind / solar where they can see,
make up all sorts of lies about wind / solar, while bush refuses to give equal subsidies to «alternative» energy and refuses to tax windfall profits to
oil companies, who break records year after year in profits...
Just a few weeks prior to the BP
oil spill, President Obama announced that more areas would be opened up for
offshore drilling, though a compromise was
made which kept several areas the
oil industry wanted access to off limits.
«Thinking that there is more
oil to be
drilled offshore gives people a false sense of hope that there's actually enough
oil out there to
make us energy independent,» says Jonathan Dorn, staff researcher at the Earth Policy Institute.
In January 2018, the federal government threatened New York's coastline with its Outer Continental Shelf
Oil and Gas Program for 2019 - 2024, proposing to make more than 90 percent of the total offshore acreage in the United States available to oil and gas drilli
Oil and Gas Program for 2019 - 2024, proposing to
make more than 90 percent of the total
offshore acreage in the United States available to
oil and gas drilli
oil and gas
drilling.
«This tragic spill
makes it clear that the miniscule benefits of
offshore oil drilling are not worth the consequences,» says Jim Moriarty, Surfrider Foundation's CEO.
Our opportunity here isn't only about protecting the ocean waters of America, marine life, a favorite surf break, jobs or a given beach community; it's about demanding that our government utilize the best available science and data and listen to the massive outpouring of public opposition to destructive
offshore oil and gas development, to shift the tides of energy development instead away from fossil fuels and toward renewables; it's about holding our President and federal agencies accountable for decisions they
make about the management of the ocean; it's about protecting the ocean and every coastline from the atrocity and injustice of
offshore drilling and exploration; it's about protecting clean water, air and beaches now and for the future; it's about protecting one another, and the Earth.
HEMP is a good answer — no wars were fought for hemp and cooking
oil, no harmful pipelines were built and leaked for that
oil, no ocean life was ruined due to
offshore drilling, no one's health was effected for that vegetable
oil, the air is cleaner with that
oil due to no green house gases released — this
oil can be recycled from our food — hemp can replace fibers, pulp, plastics and it still
makes food and grows in under 3 months (and it does not need much water, no fertilizer and cleans the air!!
and George Bush, perhaps with an eye towards the fuel riots going on around the world, jumps and proposes the new Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse: 1)
drilling offshore, 2)
drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, 3) adding refineries, and 4) extracting
oil from shale, which
makes the Alberta Tar Sands look environmentally benign.
To illustrate, I bring you the 7 stupidest things said about the BP
oil spill so far... Some of these statements are
made out of pure ignorance, while others are clearly intended to downplay the impact of the event, and any ramifications it might have on
offshore drilling in general.
The
oil spill sealed the fate of the Kerry - Lieberman bill,
making any push to expand
offshore drilling untenable in the short term.
This BP representative probably was correct was way off base in his Congressional testimony,
made back in November of 2009, that
offshore oil drilling in the Gulf has a long history of being «safe.»