Sentences with phrase «often accept a settlement»

People often accept a settlement offer, only to later discover they accepted an amount far lower than the value of their claim.

Not exact matches

Arguments have been made that banks in general often do not face criminal prosecution for violating anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist financing regulations, but instead, according to the author of the aforementioned article referred to above,» (accept) settlements that either defer or erase the threat of criminal suits.»

Often times, most creditors (including the IRS) are willing to accept a settlement — which is a partial payment of the total amount due — in lieu of going to court.

More often though, you need to be at least between 120 and 150 days late to make a settlement offer that the creditors will accept.

Lenders often will report the debt as «settled for less than agreed» or «settlement accepted» for seven years.

In the rare instance where a creditor balks at accepting a reasonable settlement at the time it is proposed, it is often a matter of simply waiting for a different phase of the collection process.

IF YOU HAVE MAJOR COLLECTIONS >> > SETTLEMENT CAN OFTEN WORK if you get a lump sum of money after being in collections... take that amount... split it up at about 60 percent per debt... offer them 40 % and then they will often talk you back up to that 60 and be able to accepOFTEN WORK if you get a lump sum of money after being in collections... take that amount... split it up at about 60 percent per debt... offer them 40 % and then they will often talk you back up to that 60 and be able to accepoften talk you back up to that 60 and be able to accept it.

Often times attornies will recommend that you take a settlement to avoid a costly trial, often that force you to accept a series of payments over a number of years, which might be if you don't have any immediate need to make use of that money, but if you have major health bills or any other immediate need for the money that you've received from a lawsuit, a payment over many years simply won't do much forOften times attornies will recommend that you take a settlement to avoid a costly trial, often that force you to accept a series of payments over a number of years, which might be if you don't have any immediate need to make use of that money, but if you have major health bills or any other immediate need for the money that you've received from a lawsuit, a payment over many years simply won't do much foroften that force you to accept a series of payments over a number of years, which might be if you don't have any immediate need to make use of that money, but if you have major health bills or any other immediate need for the money that you've received from a lawsuit, a payment over many years simply won't do much for you.

Insurance settlement offers are often grossly inadequate and, without the help of an experienced attorney, you may not realize the true value of your case and may mistakenly accept a minimal offer.

Instead, Gwire believes that small firms and solos are often taking on work that they lack the expertise to handle, and then find themselves forced to accept a low - ball settlement for a fraction of what the case is worth.

In fact, insurance companies often low - ball settlement offers, hoping that you will just accept the first settlement offer and drop your claim, happy to have some cash to pay your medical bills.

Brain injuries often require years of rehabilitation or assistive care, and you need to take this into consideration before accepting a settlement with the insurance company.

Often the judge or dispute resolution officer presiding over the court conferences encourages parties to find agreement, make reasonable settlement offers, and to accept reasonable settlement offers.

Large law firms with significant overhead costs are often motivated to rush cases and accept lower settlements.

People often accept lower settlements without understanding the full extent of their injuries.

Regarding investor - State dispute settlement (ISDS), they reflect a view which, starting with Maffezini, progressively gained traction and, accepts that today ISDS is the key element of a BIT; the only independent and impartial (and, often, confidential) forum of experts to which foreign investors can turn.