Sentences with phrase «often act in the ways»

This fact itself can become a self - fulfilling prophecy, for people often act in the ways they are expected to.

Investors themselves often act in ways that lead to their own crashing and burning, causing them to think they are always late to the party, or that the punchbowl was taken away just before they arrived.

3) Emotional and Sexual Intimacy Couples want emotional closeness and a fulfilling sexual relationship despite too often acting in ways that undermine these types of intimacy.

Not exact matches

The can spam act requires inclusion of an address as well as an easy way for recipients to opt out of receiving these emails in the future; these are most often pre-set into email newsletter services.

Our egos will often trick us into thinking and, thus acting in a way that is not in our best interest.

The act — be it going to lunch in a different way, or something completely different that better suits your own world - is most often completely inconsequential, and that is exactly why its consequences are so profound.

People in this job category often supplement their incomes in other ways, such as teaching acting at private acting schools.

This world is a dangerous place to live, not because of the good people that often act in irrational and / or criminally wrongdoing ways within the confines of their individual minds, core or enterprise groups, but because of the good people that don't do anything about it (like reveal the truth through education like Financial Samauri is doing!).

The idea is that we, as humans, act in predictable ways; a reason why history repeats itself so often.

I love how you and so many other atheist / agnostic individuals accuse «believers» of acting in emotional, unscientific ways, yet it is often your side that fails to debate in a coherent, logical, and civil manner.

I have often thought, particularly when working in the diocesan marriage tribunal, that our acknowledgement of the fact of Original Sin gives us such a head start when it comes to understanding human nature, and why people act the way they do.

But the boundaries of households are often blurred, and in any case households do not act consistently in purely self - serving ways.

In the same way that the Black Lives Matter movement simply seeks to highlight that black lives do, in fact, matter (in a society that mostly acts like this is not the case), feminism is a movement that allows women to speak up about the issues that affect them (in a society that often tries to silence them, as illustrated in my previous pointsIn the same way that the Black Lives Matter movement simply seeks to highlight that black lives do, in fact, matter (in a society that mostly acts like this is not the case), feminism is a movement that allows women to speak up about the issues that affect them (in a society that often tries to silence them, as illustrated in my previous pointsin fact, matter (in a society that mostly acts like this is not the case), feminism is a movement that allows women to speak up about the issues that affect them (in a society that often tries to silence them, as illustrated in my previous pointsin a society that mostly acts like this is not the case), feminism is a movement that allows women to speak up about the issues that affect them (in a society that often tries to silence them, as illustrated in my previous pointsin a society that often tries to silence them, as illustrated in my previous pointsin my previous points).

The best way to bring the sinfulness of such sins home to us is to point toward the places where humans in fact act wrongly: in home, school, business, contacts with others, and the like, where by pride, self - seeking, neglect of our neighbors, ugliness of behavior in our homes, and so much else, we often behave in a reprehensible manner or we subtly and insidiously treat other persons as mere «things.»

When they act in unsustainable ways, this is often because their traditional systems have been disrupted and they can survive only by destructive practices.

For example, suppose that if everyone chose to act in this way, the end we aim at would be destroyed; or that if my choice were repeated often enough, the human race would disappear.

Often this is not very significant, but when a special occasion comes along, a crisis, an opportunity to act in a really important and decisive way, we will be more or less ready to actualize the best possibility In that situation if we have been exercising our freedom attentively all alonin a really important and decisive way, we will be more or less ready to actualize the best possibility In that situation if we have been exercising our freedom attentively all alonIn that situation if we have been exercising our freedom attentively all along.

We can be sure that he acted in a particular characteristic way, but often not that he did just this or that.

True to that vision, The Goldfinch remains a largely secular story, and its characters often act as if God does not exist: They live for the moment, sin boldly, and speak in profane ways.

Whether we act on our dreams in grand ways or simply let them fade back into our subconscious often depends on the impact and clarity of the dream in relation to our current state of being / existence.

Christians get a bad rep, and often deservably so, for failing to act in the ways that Christianity instructs us to act.

Indeed, my conviction that I ought to act in a certain way often seems dependent on my view that it is right without qualification.

Often I assert that everyone ought to act in a certain way, or simply that that way of acting is right without qualification.

That's the way the world often behaves towards its enemies, but the church often acts in similar fashion.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Kids who have been through a divorce often act in certain ways.

If teens interrupt too often, talk too much, don't listen well, or act in ways that seem bossy or intrusive, they will put other people off.

When your child acts up, the best way to nip the behavior in the bud is often to remove him from the activity at hand and give him a chance to calm down.

No doubt the child with the issues is more deeply discouraged, and hence their feelings of inferiority are deeply stirred and this creates the greater drive to overcome those feelings, often in mistake ways that appear as «acting up».

To put the point another way, I'm interested not so much in why people act but rather why, in circumstances that are often intolerable, they don't act — the «non-event of quiescence», as John Gaventa memorably defined it.

In fact, the two are often presented together, with Whole30 acting as a way to «try» going paleo.

This is due to the abilities they have to speak and act in the right ways and at the right times and are often very empathetic.

Your ultimate goal should not be to do more elaborate acts of self - care more often; it should be to give your body what it's asking for in the right way at the right time — then everything will open up for you.

The Look of Silence acts in many ways as a concerted complement to its mind - bending predecessor but with its own meaningful shock treatment: our guide this time is an Indonesian, Adi, whose older brother was murdered during the Sixties genocide; and the documentary structure is somewhat more serial and more static in its interviews, as Adi confronts killers in often dangerous visits.

It's a stodgy, conversative picture, very proper and absolutely beautiful in its own way, but the cast members often appear to be acting in different pictures.

Sidelining many of the most inspiring aspects of the civil rights movement, the film focuses solely on the nitty - gritty and often alarming way in which Johnson juggled the opposing demands of movement leaders, like Martin Luther King (Anthony Mackie), with those of Southern Democrats, embodied here by Johnson friend and mentor Georgia Senator Richard Russell (Frank Langella), to force the act through a divided and, in many cases, openly racist Congress.

Though the scene that Kingsley and Hopkins share is a mere shtick - off compared to the elegantly modulated master class in acting that Robert De Niro and Al Pacino put on in Heat, the scenery - chewing on display goes a long way toward elevating Collide above its more dunderheaded and often self - serious ilk.

Actually, «rage» is a fairly inaccurate way of describing the way Oscar himself pursues his passion even without any cameras to film his performances; his demeanor as he sits in the back of a limousine traveling to and from his various acting «appointments» more often reminds one of Samuel Beckett's famous expression of weary existentialism: «I can't go on.

And as a sophisticated man, watching these guys act the way they act (and more often than not partially in the buff) is plain awkward too.

It says there's a need to act because research suggests the way teacher aides are often used in schools «does not represent a sound educational approach for low - attaining pupils or those with [Special Educational Needs]».

Michelle Paccagnella, Psychologist at the ACT Academy of Sport, says that pressure is used often by sports coaches and can be an incredible motivational tool when applied in the right way.

However, often times the social pressure is so great that parents feel as if they must «act in ways validated by the school system, or their participation is not recognized or may be resented» [xi].

This sort of backward thinking echo back to the days before the passage of the No Child Left Behind Act in 2001, when education policymakers and practitioners preferred to ignore the racialist policies that often made American public education a way - station to poverty and prison for poor and minority children.

Sorry, it's so tiresome to come in with the dictionary's definition of something — we writers pull this shtick way too often — but here it is: «conference» is «the act of consulting together usually formally: interchange of views.»

Doling out information bit by bit is a great way to gauge interest in the book, let your readers know how much effort you're putting into your work, and to uncover the often mysterious act of writing a book.

Additionally, the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, a new federal mandate requiring stricter reporting guidelines on foreign financial assets, often used by millionaires as a way to avoid paying taxes, began implementation in 2013.

This submission gesture often is used in greetings or as an appeasement gesture, a way to say «I'm sorry» when you act upset.

Often people are moving a dog or acting in a threatening way because they've been told they need to show their dog who's boss.

As said, though, this «water» does act rather strangely, moving in a fashion that more resembles jelly than H20: it slowly globs down slopes rather than running down them as one would expect of water, sits on the edges of curved hills and otherwise generally just behaves in strange and often unpredictable ways.

He's portrayed as the opposite of Batman in many ways, a dangerous opponent that seems to know exactly how the Dark Knight thinks and acts, and yet in reality he often comes across as a petulant child unhappy with the mean old Batman blowing his tanks up.