Sentences with phrase «often changed the topic»

Not exact matches

Driver changes between seasons are often hot topics in Formula 1 and there have been some major modifications to the grid in the past.

This often works, but I find that I have to work hard to maintain this change in topic.

followed by a change in topic often works to end an unhelpful conversation.

Whilst these blogs are popular - in terms of unique visitor numbers (and before Unity has a go at me, I know there are weaknesses in those numbers)- they tend to be written by people who write about a large number of issues and climate change is not their principle topic (or even one that they discuss very often).

We also conduct research, often working in collaboration with scientists and engineers across PNNL and around the world, on related topics such as the renewable energy, complex regional meteorology and chemistry, and the possible national security implications of climate change.

I think about this topic very often... I've been a huge reader since I was a little kid but now things have changed... to my surprise, I find myself doing all the things you wrote, seeking for synthesis and condensed information in articles.

Therefore, this topic made me fly 6000 plus miles to the magical kingdom of 6 Appian Way (Harvard Graduate School of Education), where the brightest of minds meet, conceptualize ideas and have often, more or less changed or trained the world.

What they do: The standards only set the endgame of instruction, not the actual curriculum, but they definitely change how schools teach students in different grades, including more depth in specific topics and often earlier in a child's school career.

One of the most controversial topics in bird keeping is what should be put in the tray at the bottom of a cage and how often it should be changed.

On this topic, Mr. Brand may be deemed a Keynesian, in the sense of an observation often attributed to John Maynard Keynes: «When the facts change, I change my mind, sir.

Blair, pardon me if I seemed to be over-reactive, but if you follow the topic of climate change for more than a very short while you'll see that all too often the «argument» of people who disagree with results they don't like is to mount the ultimate personal attack: they try to substitute comments about an author's personal background for substantive comment about the author's work.

Many broadcasters have devoted little time to the topic, while some organizations like Fox News have relied on panelists who often aren't experts on climate change.

None of seven the topics are at all scientifically controversial within the scientific community: Global warning, often presented in the media as an inconclusive theory, is anything but, with 97 % or more of scientists agreeing that recent climate change is very likely due to human activity.

Yet who despite lack of relevant expertise, do not welcome the appraisal of experts — and on this topic the experts are those scientists in directly related fields who professionally study this issue — but often, at least with the more general anti climate change efforts that have massively skewed the «discussion,» in fact often expend a great deal of effort to find any possible fault, real or imagined with anything they assert, then erroneously turn that into a refutation of the broader issue, along with, often, denigrating climate science efforts, and often climate scientists.

This topic is enormously practically important because nations and others who argue against proposed climate change policies usually rely on various economic arguments which often completely ignore the ethical and justice limitations of these arguments (In the case of the United States, see Brown, 2012.)

«Franke James is among the tiny handful of really powerful and profound artists who have taken on climate change — the most important topic on the planet, but one so big and all - encompassing that it often defies artistic interpretation.

The topic of Mike's lecture was human - caused climate change, and at the end of the talk, one member of the audience — a local who had decided to attend the seminar — made a comment during the Q+A casting doubt on the greenhouse effect, suggesting that CO2, because it was heavier than other air molecules, would simply sink to the ground (a myth that is encountered surprisingly often).

Since 2000, Micah has presented the Pennsylvania Bar Association's annual marketing ethics program (as part of its three times per year «Ethics Potpourri» programming in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh), changing the focus each year to address ethics topics that have included an analysis of U.S. Supreme Court cases, advertising ethics opinions across the country, lawyer rankings and ratings, use of social media, blogs, traditional marketing approaches and missteps, internet marketing, solicitation, multi-jurisdictional practices, and state - by - state advertising requirements as they relate to everything from pre-approvals, language limitations, disciplinary actions, and the myriad of ways a law firm can (often unknowingly) violate the Rules of Professional Conduct.

I hear this general question often, or see comments in my Linkedin group, Career Change Central often addressing this topic.

I often coach on the topic of career change, including the option of starting a side business or project while maintaining your current job.