Sentences with phrase «often come to a point»

Unfortunately, mothers often come to a point where they feel like they will fall apart.

The bodices of women's gowns were usually long waisted, often coming to a point, and necklines were often square and cut low.

We're talking about the pet going ballistic and flying through the air for a long distance, often coming to the point of rest dead.

They often come to a point before giving out, piercing the black like lightning.

Solo attorneys often come to the point in their practice when they ask themselves: Should I hire an associate?

Not exact matches

It's more than often the direction you're pointed if you have an idea and talk to any old - school business person, corporate lifer or institutional banker — at least when it comes to getting your startup idea off the ground.

What we often notice is that fundamental analysis rules when it comes time to make decisions in relation to entry points.

I should point out that biblical studies has a distinct advantage over theology when it comes to finding a place in the university, since it is a historical discipline which can and often does just as well locate elsewhere — for instances in a department of Near East studies.

He often found it hard to make decisions himself, and he needed her clarity — the way she came to the point at once.

19) of the Posterior Analytics, where Aristotle describes how the mind ascends to the first principles on which all science is grounded, he points out that the immediate point of departure of the inductive movement is not mere sense perception, but «experience»: «So from perception there comes memory, as we call it, and from memory (when it occurs often in connection with the same thing), experience; for memories that are many in number form a single experience.

He also points out that property in urban areas comes at a premium, so it's often more cost - effective to redevelop existing buildings rather than create new ones.

Sermons that make this second point about poor people tithing often transition over to Matthew 19:29 (or Mark 10:29 - 30) where Jesus promises that those who give up relationships, possessions, homes, and land for His sake, will receive one - hundred times as much in this life and in the life to come.

The truth is, I enjoy many of your points and I'll try to comment on some of those more often so I don't come off as a total troll.

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

When we come down to detail the classification is often uncertain, and there will never be unanimity about the point where the line is to be drawn.

The determining factors for one's soul fitness (for both this life and the one to come) are most often determined by whatever eschatological (or scatological depending on your own particular point of view) lens is doing the interpreting.

Scripture and worship, «like fingers pointing to the moon» should lead us beyond themselves and I have come to find the way of silence and contemplation often more helpful than elaborate and wordy worship.

As Robert George (also then a member of the President's Council on Bioethics) has often pointed out, no beliefs about «ensoulment,» no religious beliefs, and no «metaphysics» about ultimate questions need be invoked to come to the conclusion that the earliest embryo is one of us.

Different genres of movies portray information differently, and so just as you would not expect accurate history and science to come from a love story, even documentaries, which often do portray accurate history and science, reveal history and science from a particular perspective, carefully selecting material to make a certain point, or tell a certain story.

I also would like to point out that most people who do not have faith express very angry postings when it comes to any religious story often targeting the church or religious people.

In sufficient number of causes to make us humble, we discover good points in the cause which time has erased, just as one often learns more from the slain hero of a tragedy than from some brassy Fortinbras who comes in at the end to announce the victory and proclaim the future disposition of affairs.

We have been doing this for more than seven years now and I have personally come to a point where I want everything to be so damn perfect every time that I often get stuck in this circle of «this is not good enough».

When non-professional cooks (i.e., most of my friends) watch me cook at home, there often comes a point when they turn to me with a look of disbelief on their face.

Before God and man Nketiah's case under the tutelage of the so called Arsene Wenger often grieves me to breaking point as i don't see Wenger as the right manager for Nketiah but i see Nketiah as the right big - thing - to - come for Arsenal FC.

The first points are often the hardest to come by..

Bennett, who also spoke with Bell, brought home a major point that is often overlooked when it comes to Kaepernick's situation.

I mean, we all heard this offseason about the changes to the extra point play that were coming and that the league would use that to incentivize teams to go for two more often.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

It also helps the players and the fans to settle into the game and allows the confidence to spread, which is why Arsene Wenger has been making such a big point of it to his team after the first half of the season saw us fail to make our possession count and saw us often having to come from behind.

Picture this, we don't come out of the gate firing on all cylinders, Wenger speaks of how there wasn't enough time for the first - teamers to build chemistry, several key players aren't even playing because of Wenger's utterly ridiculous policy regarding players who played in the Confed Cup or the under21s and the boo - birds have returned in full flight... if these things were to happen, which is quite possible considering the Groundhog Day mentality of this club, how long do you think it will take for Wenger to recant his earlier statements regarding Europa... I would suggest that it's these sorts of comments from Wenger which are often his undoing... why would any manager worth his weight in salt make such a definitive statement before the season has even started... why would any manager who fashions himself an educated man make such pronouncements before even knowing what his starting 11 will be come Friday, let alone on September 1st... why would any manager who has a tenuous relationship with a great many supporters offer up such a potentially contentious talking point considering how many times his own words have come back to bite him in the ass... I think he does this because he doesn't care what you or I think, in fact he's more than slightly infuriated by the very idea of having to answer to the likes of you and me... that might have been acceptable during his formative years in charge, when the fans were rewarded with an scintillating brand of football and success felt like a forgone conclusion, but this new Wenger led team barely resembles that team of ore... whereas in times past we relished a few words from our seemingly cerebral manager, in recent times those words have been replaced by a myriad of excuses, a plethora of infuriating stories about who he could have signed but didn't and what can only be construed as outright fabrications... it's kind of funny that when we want some answers, like during the whole contract debacle of last season, we can't get an intelligent word out of him, but when we just what him to show his managerial acumen through his actions, we can't seem to get him to shut - up... I beg you to prove me wrong Arsene

I just feel like she'll come out, throw those half power punches, throw a few kicks which more often than not seem slow and telegraphed, make that exhaling noise she constantly makes when completing any kind of movement and get her hand raised on a boring decision because she's regressed to this weird point fighting style.

Some Arsenal fans will agree with the criticism that Merson often levels at the manager or the team in general or even at specific players like Mesut Ozil, but I for one feel that our former midfield star isd always looking for a negative spin about our club, so I was surprised to see a Metro report today in which Merson suggests that we are the right side and have what it takes to defy expectations this week and come away from the clash at high flying Man City with all three points.

Plus point of playing Gabriel is that he very often comes close to scoring for us through set pieces!

Despite the former Real Madrid midfielder having broke his personal best in a Gunners shirt when it comes to goals at this early point in the campaign, Arsene Wenger has insisted he should still be finding himself on the score sheet more often.

My lowest point came 1992 - 96 watching the Graham era unravel and I often wonder what would have happened to us if Wenger never turned up out of the blue; a «no - one» who Dein bought to Arsenal.

Teams don't often come from three goals down and to think that despite pulling back level Arsenal fans still felt disappointed that all three points weren't gained shows the belief the fans have in their team.

While La Salle never got closer than 10 points in the second half, they made a couple of runs to get the scorer closer than it should have been, and often it came against Villanova's backups.

NFL personnel executives and scouts are often quick to point out that statistics are relatively meaningless when it comes to scouting a player.

For those who take against the idea of him being a creative player — a footballer who is lauded as Liverpool's playmaker yet comes nowhere near the top of the assists table in the Premier League this season, and often looks to take his own pot shots rather than play others in — the labels used to describe the Brazilian are a sore point in themselves.

As Rio Ferdinand pointed out via Twitter, many English players (Rooney & Gerrard to name just 2) have often let their pride get in the way of making more sensible decisions when it came to their personal fitness.

Neutrals and rival fans often enjoy the schadenfreude when a club, having come into newfound wealth to the point that its fans say they are going to «enjoy the ride», then sprays it up the wall and subsequently has to clean up the mess.

Quinny Yezz is not as versatile as full size (often heavy) devices but rather come with the bare minimum to get you and your child from point A to point B safely and reasonably comfortably.

And our 2.5 and 4.5 year olds still wake at night and come into our room / bed at some point (often close to morning).

More questions — can you still speak of «bad» sleep associations when the baby might need a feed before bed but always finishes herself at some point, throwing her head back and coming off the breast, is capable of going off to sleep just by munching on her muslin, often just with dad present?

And often times when a mom is starting to come to the point where she is realizing that she might have feelings of resentment for the baby, and she feels like she is not a good mom, she is exhausted at that point.

Moreover, as Dr. Joyce Slater, a guest blogger on Weighty Matters, later pointed out with respect to the Ritz crackers incident, daycare workers are often greatly overburdened and undereducated when it comes to making the decisions required of them under Manitoba's well - meaning nutrition policies.

At this point, your mature milk has not quite come in, and moms often wonder how they will be able to tell if their baby is getting enough milk.

The Cabinet Manual states that «[t] he point at which the restrictions on financial and other commitments should come to an end depends on circumstances, but may often be either when a new Prime Minister is appointed by the Sovereign or where a government's ability to command the confidence of the Commons has been tested in the House of Commons» (§ 2.30).

Several conversations over the past few days have kept coming back to the same point: in the online world, things that seem cheap often aren't, and things that seem expensive may actually be the cheaper alternative.

Zaino pointed out that New York Democrats are often front and center in the media when it comes to slamming Republicans for a «war on women.»