Sentences with phrase «often done in cases»

This is often done in cases of overly fractious dogs or when there may be pain or the need for the dog to remain immobile for extended periods of time.

Not exact matches

But often you can't, and whatever you lose, you have to accept that you don't have it any longer and continue with your business, in some cases, as if you're starting that day.

As is often the case, the Government is busy pointing their finger at energy providers and energy providers are busy pointing their finger at the Government - but no one seems to be doing anything about it, and the people (and businesses) of South Australia are caught in the middle.

While it can often bring in the worst of leads, it does usually bring in many more leads overall, especially in cases where tightly grouped keyword sets are hard to assemble.

This is often the case in law when you receive a preliminary ruling that does not support your case or, as is often the case, a ruling that makes trial more difficult for both parties.

I have often seen cases in which entrepreneurs are unable to repay relatives because they subsequently raise money from professional investors who do not look kindly on business owners who try to repay one class of equity investors before others.

But as is often the case with politics — and business — better to watch what they do rather than what they say: Nintendo Canada GM and VP Ron Bertram told Canadian Business Online that the company was uninterested in gaming experiences that required the player to go online and buy additional content to complete a game.

In some cases, the top of the proverbial food chain at the tropical sweat shop where some companies quarter their customer service reps is an often imaginary supervisor who apparently doesn't do anything except spend all of his or her in meetings with God knows who, discussing God knows whaIn some cases, the top of the proverbial food chain at the tropical sweat shop where some companies quarter their customer service reps is an often imaginary supervisor who apparently doesn't do anything except spend all of his or her in meetings with God knows who, discussing God knows whain meetings with God knows who, discussing God knows what.

It doesn't help that Canadians often get lulled into a sense of complacency, unwisely believing that we live in a country that protects investors through laws and regulations, when in fact the opposite is the case.

This number can and will change depending on the environment but in most cases stocks and bonds don't move together or with the same magnitude very often.

At the risk of repetition (a risk from which, according to some regular readers, I do not often shirk) in the case of China and the United States, I would summarize very broadly by making two points.

While it's true that people often use cryptic language to show off, just as often it's simply a case of forgetting that there are those in the world who don't live and breathe the markets.

As so often is the case, these gradual changes in the economic environment do not enter the consciousness of many of the professional observers, let alone the general public.

Search warrants are more often used in cases in which prosecutors do not trust people to preserve or turn over the records themselves.

But more often than not, you find yourself in a grey area where there is not a strong case to do something, where all incoming data have to be evaluated on their merits and policy options weighed up.

In some cases, renters may be able to purchase a home with less than 20 % in down payment, but those who do so will often be required to purchase mortgage insurance, increasing the cost of their paymenIn some cases, renters may be able to purchase a home with less than 20 % in down payment, but those who do so will often be required to purchase mortgage insurance, increasing the cost of their paymenin down payment, but those who do so will often be required to purchase mortgage insurance, increasing the cost of their payment.

Their study found that Americans waste 160 billion pounds of food each year — often because of simple misunderstandings about expiration dates: Many Americans refuse to consume food after the dates on packaging passes, even though in many cases, the dates have nothing to do with food safety.

Part of the contemporary problem in making a convincing case for the humanities is that their defenders, despite producing blue - ribbon reports about the current state of education, often do a shockingly bad job of explaining why they are important.

Philip Larkin's «Church Going» comes to mind: Yet stop I did: in fact I often do, And always end much at a loss like this, Wondering what to look for; wondering, too, When churches fall completely out of use What we shall turn them into, if we shall keep A few cathedrals chronically on show, Their parchment, plate, and pyx in locked cases, And let the rest rent - free to rain and sheep.

So even though I think abortion is morally wrong in most cases, and support more legal restrictions around it, I often vote for pro-choice candidates when I think their policies will do the most to address the health and economic concerns that drive women to get abortions in the first place.

While I acknowledge your point that expressing such ire can sometimes make engagement more daunting for the accused, in cases such as this one the support it lends the silenced more often than not outweighs the additional burden it places on those doing the silencing.

The effect in English «Latin Mass circles», however, isn't the most important issue on which we need to focus, though I agree that it does show that there is something remarkably «mean - spirited» in the air, a fact which also emerged strongly in widespread attempts to frustrate the motu proprio; it also shows that although that many - faced and mysterious entity we tend simply to call «Rome» can sometimes be relied on to defend us from reductionist tendencies in the English and Welsh Church, it is also the case that all too often it can't.

In the case of religious teachers, the easy way out is often to teach things of which we have no idea, to give answers which do not satisfy ourselves, speak of things we have not heard, show things we have not seen.

But the boundaries of households are often blurred, and in any case households do not act consistently in purely self - serving ways.

The orientation does not dictate any specific conclusions about a given issue, in this case recombinant DNA research, but it does constitute a very large and often determinative factor in decision - making processes.

I often wonder why believers such as yourself assume that just because someone posts something that you don't agree with or don't like, that that must * mean * they are unhappy, miserable (in this case), no life, etc...?

Clive, you point out how others often don't understand what Jesus was saying; but while Jesus often labors to try and make things clear to the unbeliever («Oh, you of little faith) or at the very least the author tries to make it clear for us in retrospect (At the time they didn't understand that he spoke of this...), in this case Jesus switches from something that might be figurative to essentially say «no, I seriously mean this» and it concludes not with Jesus saying «don't go away, this is what I actually mean» but confirming that people would refuse to accept that God intended for them to actually fill themselves with the life that He offered so they stopped following him.

In America many Christians who insist on a literal interpretation of anything in the Bible are often ready to say «but, in this case, Jesus didn't really mean...» when both Jesus and the author of this Gospel labor to convey «You aren't supposed to try to take the live of other things on Earth... that's the whole point, I want you to take on life that only I can offer!&raquIn America many Christians who insist on a literal interpretation of anything in the Bible are often ready to say «but, in this case, Jesus didn't really mean...» when both Jesus and the author of this Gospel labor to convey «You aren't supposed to try to take the live of other things on Earth... that's the whole point, I want you to take on life that only I can offer!&raquin the Bible are often ready to say «but, in this case, Jesus didn't really mean...» when both Jesus and the author of this Gospel labor to convey «You aren't supposed to try to take the live of other things on Earth... that's the whole point, I want you to take on life that only I can offer!&raquin this case, Jesus didn't really mean...» when both Jesus and the author of this Gospel labor to convey «You aren't supposed to try to take the live of other things on Earth... that's the whole point, I want you to take on life that only I can offer!»

In the same way that the Black Lives Matter movement simply seeks to highlight that black lives do, in fact, matter (in a society that mostly acts like this is not the case), feminism is a movement that allows women to speak up about the issues that affect them (in a society that often tries to silence them, as illustrated in my previous pointsIn the same way that the Black Lives Matter movement simply seeks to highlight that black lives do, in fact, matter (in a society that mostly acts like this is not the case), feminism is a movement that allows women to speak up about the issues that affect them (in a society that often tries to silence them, as illustrated in my previous pointsin fact, matter (in a society that mostly acts like this is not the case), feminism is a movement that allows women to speak up about the issues that affect them (in a society that often tries to silence them, as illustrated in my previous pointsin a society that mostly acts like this is not the case), feminism is a movement that allows women to speak up about the issues that affect them (in a society that often tries to silence them, as illustrated in my previous pointsin a society that often tries to silence them, as illustrated in my previous pointsin my previous points).

Case in point: «salvation» in the Old Testament does often refer to political and social salvation.

The authors often cite scripture, but, as in this case, do not make their hermeneutic explicit, seeming to apply a very literalistic method without much benefit from biblical scholarship.

Julie in Austin, (I actual used to go to school at the Jewish temple in downtown Austin) «In other cases, it assumes (as often do the arguments of Atheists) the very conclusion it is trying to reach»in Austin, (I actual used to go to school at the Jewish temple in downtown Austin) «In other cases, it assumes (as often do the arguments of Atheists) the very conclusion it is trying to reach»in downtown Austin) «In other cases, it assumes (as often do the arguments of Atheists) the very conclusion it is trying to reach»In other cases, it assumes (as often do the arguments of Atheists) the very conclusion it is trying to reach».

Yet, to repeat another point made earlier, if these constraints themselves become too rigid, as they often do in the unfolding of a religious tradition, then the communication flow becomes so burdened with redundancy that it loses any truly informational (in this case, revelatory) character and decays into the transmission of mere banality.

In other cases, it assumes (as often do the arguments of Atheists) the very conclusion it is trying to reach.

«Far too often the case is like... «I have a heart for inner - city youth, so I'm going to create a program and go implement it, but I didn't grow up in that context» or «I don't know what specifically the needs are.

In the case of abortion, the obstacles will often be overcome by factual information about the peaceful, compassionate work of pro-life groups, the damage done to women by abortion, the increasing information on the life of the child in the womIn the case of abortion, the obstacles will often be overcome by factual information about the peaceful, compassionate work of pro-life groups, the damage done to women by abortion, the increasing information on the life of the child in the womin the womb.

They often include provisions about religious practices for the couple and for any children who may arrive; whether or not they plan to have children; what they will do in the case of a pregnancy not wanted by one or the other; what will happen if the couple decides to separate; what the financial arrangements will be in such a case; what provision will be made for the children; how in - laws, relatives, and friends will be included in the relationship; what sexual practices will be followed; under what circumstances the couple will move from one home to another; whose job will take precedence; and what kinds of freedom each partner is to have.

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

However, the monks in Celtic lands do seem to have had a greater awareness of the Creation as a revelation of God than has often been the case.

Hence what is required is just what Leonard Hodgson has so often, and rightly, demanded: we must ask ourselves what the case really is, so far as we can grasp it today, if people who thought and wrote like that, phrased it in the way they did.

Rather do we take a stern joy in the astringency and desolation; and what is called weakness of character seems in most cases to consist in the inaptitude for these sacrificial moods, of which one's own inferior self and its pet softnesses must often be the targets and the victims.

In case you don't make it to that corner of the web very often, let me commend to your attention Verdicts, Commonweal's new blog covering books and culture.

In this case, the Indian government promised to step in to fill the gap — but developing - country governments often can not afford to do thiIn this case, the Indian government promised to step in to fill the gap — but developing - country governments often can not afford to do thiin to fill the gap — but developing - country governments often can not afford to do this.

Often times, as in my case, the religious community is a substitue for our broken families of origin.Idolized leave it to beaver believers... what results, ineviable, is people do what people do... display their confusion and pathological leanings to miss the mark... Finally, after a slow painful death to my / our illusions, we can give up being perfect in favoure of a peace that passes all understanding and give a big jucicy kiss to the abusuridy of our naccasistic culture while finding ways to celebrate our ONENESS....

For myself, I do believe there are independent «things» which are'institution / s» which, if kept small and changed often, and devoid of power, are not necessarily a bad thing, but which, in the case of the church, has become far too large and been around in it's present form / s for far too long, with more power than is proper, and in many cases oppressing the people within its employ (not just those on the payroll but the volunteers as well).

I don't often have «troll's remorse», but I think it is warranted in this case.

Hasker's third proposition is that for the problem of divine non-intervention to be a real problem, «we must be able to identify specific kinds of cases in which God morally ought to intervene but does not» Many critics of (traditional) theism probably already have a more or less vague list of such cases, which might include genocidal events, such as the Nazi holocaust and the Rwandan massacre; wars; large - scale natural disasters; conditions of chronic poverty, in which millions of children die from starvation or are permanently stunted because of inadequate protein; the sexual molestation of children, which often leaves them psychologically scarred for the rest of their lives; death preceded by long, painful illnesses, such as cancer or AIDS, or by mind - destroying conditions, such as Alzheimer's disease; and the kinds of events described by Dostoyevski, such as the soldier using his pistol to get a mother's baby to giggle with delight and then blowing its brains out.

«Often we don't get this opportunity, but I've been able to learn and refocus a lot of important things in my life, and this would not have been the case if I had remained busy,» Wuerffel said.

Case (s) in point; Often great passion leads to sex and, in the scope of things, that doesn't always involve two people who have considered that they stand the chance of creating a new person.

Personally, I don't see anything wrong with it — diet is a highly personal choice, and the «wellness» labels we've created for ourselves can often do more harm than good, as in this case.