Sentences with phrase «often hear arguments»

Still, I bring all this up because we often hear arguments against smart environmental policies that don't stand up to scrutiny.
I often hear the argument that believing in god does no harm, and if they are wrong, then no harm done.
I often hear the argument that sugar is ok in moderation and that eliminating any «food group» is dangerous.
I often hear the argument that we need so called healthy fats (olive oil) for proper absorption of vitamins and minerals that are fat soluble.

Not exact matches

That is an argument often heard from leasing agents at the city's new pricy office towers.
A common argument I often hear from those who try to prove to me that Jesus rose from the dead, is that because the tomb where Jesus was supposedly buried was empty the only logical conclusion was that he must have risen.
I feel strongly about this because I hear the argument used quite often that people should submit to authority, even if it's abusive, because that's what Jesus modeled for us.
I have «heard» this argument often before, but it is disappointing since it leaves out a crucial passage.
Funny, I hear this argument often (actually calling it an argument is invalid because it's not even close.)
An argument often heard is that when denominations grow large, they can not help people feel that they are significant in their religious life.
3 — How often are we going to have to hear how well he did for Wales in the 10 role at this most recent Euros, as an argument for why he should do that with Arsenal?
you often resort to the argument that i've heard a million times throughout my pregnancy when people find out i'm planning a home birth: that your birth experience doesn't matter as long as the outcome is a healthy baby.
Older children often worry about their parents» marriage or health, and can easily exaggerate mild arguments or complaints that they hear.
How often have we heard such arguments in public debates about planning?
The argument often heard is that the plan is a way to put some pressure on the legislature to «buy back» those cuts.
Some laughs - more guffaws really - from the Tories lead him onto that often - heard argument about them wanting to cut spending.
«One of the arguments that we hear quite often is that with two year terms legislators are running for reelection and with four - year terms they can concentrate more on their legislative duties, but actually this argument runs contrary to facts,» Niebel said.
There's a marvelous quote from Carl Sagan: «In science it often happens that scientists say, «You know, that's a really good argument; my position is mistaken,» and then they would actually change their minds, and you never hear that old view from them again.
The second argument I often hear for justifying this double standard is that white men have all of the power and have oppressed white women and both genders of all other races.
That science versus faith debate, so often a prized argument of the director's protagonists, is a prime example, as conversations begin to overlap with ones you've heard before.
As the promise of a computer revolution in education fades, I often hear promoters fall back on what I'll term the neutrality argument: «Computers are just tools; it's what you do with them that matters.»
SFReader, I hear the argument that «everybody's going to pirate anyway so why bother with DRM» from pirates way too often.
And one argument I often hear is that at least the student loans are being used to improve the person and get them a degree which will lead to higher earning potential.
These are major arguments I often hear regarding P2P lending, and as great as this post was, I don't think they were ever addressed in it.
I really don't think luck has much to do with long term results of successful entrepreneurs, at least not relative to their competitors (I've often heard the following argument: «Well, Buffett invested during the greatest period of prosperity in US history»... okay, well that's true, even though he's seen 3 different 50 % bear markets.
One argument that I hear my colleagues use to justify the high volume use of this drug is that owner compliance is often seriously lacking.
I hear echoes of «Wilson's Law» above, and also some resonance with articles I've written focusing on how environmental and animal - welfare groups, while often working toward shared goals (an end to whaling, for instance) rarely use the same arguments, with one focused on population statistics and the other on ethics.
So the argument one often hears that this type of technology is not currently cost effective today, may well be true — today.
The statement that only 55 % of human CO2 emissions have been removed by the biosphere / biosphere is something you'll have to prove, which is hard because as far as I'm aware human CO2 does not posses an isotopic signature that can be easily differentiated from natural sources — the arguments you often hear on Skeptical Science are measurements in changes of the C12 / C13 / C14 atmospheric mass, not individual CO2 molecules, which can be misleading.
Its an argument often heard but where's the substance?
The «Share» command in Safari makes it easy to email links to posts on WUWT to friends and relatives, but I know most don't have the time to spend studying long, often intricate arguments, and references to people they never heard of, not to mention reading lengthy Comments threads.
The most often heard «skeptical» arguments are mentioned here, with an easily understandable rebuttal.
Even as the U.S. Supreme Court gets ready to hear oral arguments in April to decide the matter, the grate state of Alabama (because, you know, so often Alabama grates) decided it couldn't just remain on the sidelines any longer.
An arbitration hearing often mirrors what you would expect to find in court: both sides present their arguments, offer evidence and testimony, and make their case in front of a neutral third party.
Often, it has not been framed after argument has been heard by a court from two or more parties.
On the other side of the debate, some of those who originally say they oppose a public health insurance option are also persuaded by hearing arguments often made by supporters of the proposal.
It may seem strange to think about needing help to talk, but when arguments escalate people often stop hearing what the other person is saying.
In our roles as Relationship Experts, we often hear partners making comments like: — I'm exhausted from the endless arguments that we have.
Couples who seem to keep having the same argument over again often do so because they feel they're not being heard or appreciated.
When personal conflicts occur and get resolved within the couple relationship, but close members of the inner circle are made privy to one side of the issue, long after the issue is over, the knowledge of that deep, personal feelings of their often skewed (because they only heard one side of the argument) perception lingers.
Often we are so busy in emotionally reactive dialogues and arguments preparing our defense or our new attack that we never really hear or acknowledge what our partner is saying.
During one of these arguments, both partners end up simply reacting to each other, often not hearing or understanding what the other is really trying to say.
Another argument supporting a communication - related explanation is the fact that DHH and hearing children equally often report that their parents do nice activities with them.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z