Sentences with phrase «often people act»

All too often people act like if you don't do something the church says you're going to you know where.

Not exact matches

You will often hear stories about someone who didn't read people and acted in anger, or maybe it's someone who didn't read people correctly and paid for it when a business decision ended up looking cold and impersonal.

The agency developed a custom browser that looks and acts like Safari and allows people to securely access content that is often blocked in commercial settings — Facebook, for instance — while a management platform allows OTG to easily update menus, add apps and quickly reset the system if there are glitches.

Another popular attack method used by hacking collectives is «doxxing»: the act of releasing personal, private information of specific people, often private citizens.

But the problem is we often hear people say they are humbled, only to act the opposite.

It often boggles my mind to the point of pickling how some people will do anything — steal, copy, act duplicitously, even machinate to make another person look terrible — just so that they can tell themselves they've won.

Because I no longer act ashamed of my» /», people are genuinely interested — and often even impressed,» she reports.

People in this job category often supplement their incomes in other ways, such as teaching acting at private acting schools.

Such tirades often lead people to ask Lang if he's acting.

People who deter you from the act of competing often do so because they're still mending their own wounds from previous losses.

This world is a dangerous place to live, not because of the good people that often act in irrational and / or criminally wrongdoing ways within the confines of their individual minds, core or enterprise groups, but because of the good people that don't do anything about it (like reveal the truth through education like Financial Samauri is doing!).

Because gay people are taught from a young age that being gay is wrong and that having feelings for someone of the same sex is queer, they suppress those feelings and (with men especially) those feelings often get expressed through random sex acts with other men.

Contrary to the plati - tudes abhorred by Lamott and put forth often by people who claim to be Christian, putting faith in God does not mean letting go, it means grabbing on to the truth of God, trusting fully in Him, and acting responsively to His love which endures for us despite our undeserving nature.

Curiously, such requests often come from people who retain little more than a vestigial sense of prayer as a ritual act that dignifies the occasion.

Men's acts often have consequences for innocent persons, which may accumulate until they burst in a flood.

How often have we turned on the evening news to yet another story of someone who committed some atrocious act and heard the reporter interviewing that person's neighbors and acquaintances and heard «We were shocked.»

I have often thought, particularly when working in the diocesan marriage tribunal, that our acknowledgement of the fact of Original Sin gives us such a head start when it comes to understanding human nature, and why people act the way they do.

Often there is healing in these people as beautifully illustrated in Thornton Wilder's one act play, The Angel That Troubled the Waters, based on the biblical story of John 5:1 - 4.

We've isolated and condemned homosexuality as an especially egregious sin because 1) it's a sexual thing (and we're obsessed with sex), 2) it's relatively easy to identify and name, (unlike gossip and materialism and greed, which are condemned more often in the Bible and are more pervasive in our culture), and 3) it is «other,» (when you're straight, and in no danger of committing homosexual acts yourself, it's easy to call it an abomination because it's easier to remove specks from others people's eyes.)

I'm just trying to explain that people often abuse Christianity; claiming you are doing an unjust act for God does not make it right.

Christians who wish to speak «the language of the people» — and thus talk a lot about what makes up «the Christian lifestyle» — often assume that they can return to their own familiar «religious» language of grace and faith, sin and redemption, justice and mercy, even act and consequence, whenever they want.

It's like when friends divorce, people tend to act awkward and often just stop speaking to one of the parties out of awkwardness.

They are written down because people often do not act in their own or others best interest.

That persons have the power to act is a fact, a fact perhaps often overlooked because Whitehead calls a person a society.

This fact itself can become a self - fulfilling prophecy, for people often act in the ways they are expected to.

The best way to bring the sinfulness of such sins home to us is to point toward the places where humans in fact act wrongly: in home, school, business, contacts with others, and the like, where by pride, self - seeking, neglect of our neighbors, ugliness of behavior in our homes, and so much else, we often behave in a reprehensible manner or we subtly and insidiously treat other persons as mere «things.»

In my opinion, the people that made this video acted extremely irresponsibly, knowing full well that extremist Muslims quite often act with violence when Muhammed is involved.

The priest acts in the person of Christ to forgive and also acts to represent those affected by the sin as often you can not seek forgiveness from the person (s) you actually offended.

The Spirit may draw people to himself, but do we often run them away when our tribal urge kicks in — our need to think alike, dress alike, act alike and even look alike?

People who speak Christian often don't act Chriistian.

But it is a capital error if such protesters argue, as often happens, according to the principle that I can personally do as I like, hence I should also let others do as they like, for if the other person does what he likes I can no longer do the same and act from the same situation which would obtain if the other had not acted.

The people in undeveloped countries who are already suffering the results of the imminent nemesis are often powerless to obtain information, or to act on it.

Isn't it odd how often the voice of God commands people to commit heinous acts?

Instead of referencing people who look, live and act like Jesus, it often merely refers to people who self - identify as having loosely affiliated themselves with the «Christian» religion (in some cases as opposed to no religious affiliation, or as opposed to being affiliated with some other religion).

The Roman Catholic church maintains this position, recently describing the homosexual orientation as an «objective disorder».15 In Protestant and Anglican churches, a distinction is now often made between a homosexual orientation and homosexual genital acts; the orientation is part of some people's God - given make - up and not something for which they should be condemned.

Because people often perform righteous acts in an attempt to merit favor with God or to please and appease God.

People who «take care of» others often believe that ignoring some behavior is a caring act.

In their quest for righteousness, they often become self righteous, using their belief system as a weapon, to bash over the heads of others, rather than as a tool to improve their own lives and to become a living example of what true christians should be like or what truly compassionate humans should be like, it's very sad, that so many christians don't have a clue how to act like decent people, and that they are hypocrites and full of hate.

1 a: act: practice: process»...» - ist a suffix of nouns, often corresponding to verbs ending in - ize or nouns ending in - ism, that denote a person who practices or is concerned with something, or holds certain principles, doctrines, etc..»

When people get treated so poorly by those who claim to be acting in God's best interests, some people end up wanting nothing to do with God, and often live much of the lives apart from Him.

WTF??? What do u mean «bar people if being negative»??? How about sack Arsene for repeatedly or characteristically acting cluelessly very often???

If teens interrupt too often, talk too much, don't listen well, or act in ways that seem bossy or intrusive, they will put other people off.

Pregnant persons are often bullied by doctors and hospital staff; they might go into labor at an unexpected time, weeks before they're due; their birth plan might change so drastically the act of giving birth isn't beautiful, but essentially horrific.

When people think about practicing kindness, they often think about small acts of generosity, like buying each other little gifts or giving one another back rubs every now and then.

I'm sure it's in large part due to our culture's sexualization of breasts and because the act extended breastfeeding is often deemed «disgusting,» «weird,» and «sick» etc., by some (normally very vocal) people.

People with this name have a deep inner desire to create and express themselves, often in public speaking, acting, writing or singing.

Tools like video sharing sites, blogs, social networking sites, social media and viral marketing — technologies that gain their value from the work of people acting with only minimal direction (or none at all) and often in large numbers.

To put the point another way, I'm interested not so much in why people act but rather why, in circumstances that are often intolerable, they don't act — the «non-event of quiescence», as John Gaventa memorably defined it.

One obvious advantage of using the initiative is that taking agenda - setting power away from politicians and devolving it to the people responds to one of the central elements of contemporary «anti-politics» — the suspicion that politicians too often act in their own interests.

The first mistake people make often is give politicians a pass, by acting like politicians were forced into this, and the second great mistake is to think they could stop the people they given nearly unlimited power to by having them write an easily avoidable law to somehow restrict themselves.