Sentences with phrase «often sees the world»

During his drinking days, the alcoholic often saw the world as peopled with depriving mother figures.

Most previous studies have relied on human assessments of appearance, but predators often see the world very differently to humans.

Kids often see the world as one gigantic playground — one that doesn't include buzzkills like jobs and bills or the next - door neighbor who refuses to keep his front lawn in decent shape.

It asks the viewer to differentiate between the scrim of personal experience through which one often sees the world and the true image on the wall.

From that we develop different values, and often see the world in different ways.

«In a partnership, partners often see the world only through the lens of their own personal interests.

He often sees the world as a dangerous place and treats others with great caution.

Not exact matches

Entrepreneur and marketers are frequently told to understand their customers, but Blackman found really seeing the world through their eyes was often the key to a headline break through.

Calls to cut regulation and red tape are often the first item of business for those promoting developments in the world's major cities, but not Perth's Adrian Fini, who sees things very differently.

Identity and how we see ourselves in the world is the first and often hardest step to reaching our goals.

It provides you with a very special view of the world that others often don't see.

Too often I see businesses getting sidetracked with tactical nitty - gritty details before they've defined the absolutely essential pillars around which their brand should drape and expose itself to the world.

I've often seen business owners get lured in by low - priced SEO service providers promising them the world and delivering useless service.

They see digital as a tool (professional and social) to facilitate connection, often more in the real world than on social media.

In the corporate world, I often see a knee - jerk reaction to stakeholder activism; a rush to mount a defence with lawyers or bankers.

In the world of business, bad news often surfaces serially: You see a cockroach in your kitchen; as the days go by, you meet his relatives.»

What is interesting to see with this bitcoin hype is how uneducated writers still are when it comes to the question of what money actually is — especially the assumption that money, e.g. US Dollars, are tied to any real world values like gold is one of these modern fairytales that is repeated often — I can not understand that even after the big corporate crimes (aka as «financial crisis») that US Citizens cost millions of dollars there is still such a lack of understanding of what money actually is.

By Stephen Prothero, Special to CNN (CNN)-- In religious studies courses, professors often try to get their students to see the world through Hindu eyes or to walk a few miles in the shoes of a Confucian.

I often find it strange that so many people, mostly religious ones, take what we have for granted and always see the world from a «grass is always greener on the otherside» mentality.

As soon, in fact, as his characters come to see the awful truth about themselves and their world, they often retreat again into their accustomed obliviousness.

In this fallen world of ours, I guess it's no surprise that we often see undesirable things.

David said, «I often think there isn't malicious intent involved, just that they are so consumed and obsessed with the success of the perceived good impact they are having on the world that any kind of setback would be seen as unfortunate.»

Over the last twenty years the countries of the Third World have seen the re-emergence of the worst scourges of malnutrition, even famine, sickness, often pan-epidemics and, in OECD countries, a rise in the number of unemployed, weak homeless and those without rights.

We see this in sports, where Roger Bannister's comment about his world - record race (he was the first to run the mile in under four minutes) has often been repeated by other runners: «The world seemed to stand still, or did not exist... «17 And certainly this can be true of the play world of art, which, according to Gerardus Van der Leeuw, is a new «creation, a second world, with its own power.

I believe ordinary men and women would be amazed if they could see how often, in the black spots of the world's superstition, ignorance, disease and fear, the Christians were the first to arrive.

There are many Christians across the world who view the Danteist (sorry) vision of hell as a misnomer; and they far outnumber those I've seen, often less than graciously, termed «progressive» or «liberal».

Vic When visiting Niagara Falls I often see a rainbow above the falls which reassures me that god may not flood my area of the world anytime soon, although He seems to be trashing other areas of the world on a regular basis.

Anyone familiar with the Eastern Christian world knows that the Orthodox view of the Catholic Church is often a curious mélange of fact, fantasy, cultural prejudice, sublime theological misunderstanding, resentment, reasonable disagreement, and unreasonable dread: it sees a misty phantasmagoria of crusades, predestination, «modalism,» a God of wrath, flagellants, Grand Inquisitors, and those blasted Borgias.

I do not see anyone throwing roses at him or calling him a hero as happens too often in other places around the world, such as Pakistan.

Martin Luther presented the theology of Sola scriptura that the bible is the sole source to live and understand what Christianity is all about... but the bible itself does not come with a table of contents to prove that it is correct which is why the bible itself says that the CHURCH is the pillar and foundation of truth... remember that the church existed before even the bible was even put together... To understand the bible you cant just rely on your own interpretation like the protestants often say... The truth is always absolute and hence the teachings of the bible HAS to be absolute which is why the church is said to be ONE in nature (in every sense of the word), HOLY, CATHOLIC (Universal in teaching in every corner of the world) and APOSTOLIC (roots dating back to Jesus himself)... Now figure out what is that one church... The church put together the bible and the holy spirit always protected the church against false teachings and 1600 years later came about the teaching of Sola Scriptura... Protestants... look within and see whats wrong with this teaching.

... we are offended when people, even people like Oprah, make childish statements and claims that because every so often our beliefs about the world and existence happen to overlap means that we Atheists OBVIOUSLY really believe in «god» after all because to the believer those rare similarities in belief don't mean common ground... they mean «SEE, you are one of us no matter what!»

Although it is often infuriating, at times when I can step back and see it for what it is, these childish temper tantrums by these types (I still have no idea who Matt Walsh is, nor do I care to remedy that) are really a reaction of fear for a world that they no longer de facto control.

I believe that while God wants the church to lead the world in bringing out cultural change and redemption, the church is too often resistant to change, and so God turns to culture to be the primary leader of the change He wants to see, that's why some churches at City Central are always looking for a change, and to improve and make people improve.

The liberal readiness to see the world (with Calvin) as «the theater of God's glory» has its own tortuous history, and modem evangelicals have something to learn from that history for example, how «success» in secular society often demands compromise with that society.

Indeed, the sciences were often celebrated more by theologians, who saw them as telling us about how God orders the world, than elsewhere in the university.

Seen alternately from the conceptual perspective of existentialism, this mode of being in the world is what is called «bad faith» or «inauthenticity»: the attempt, often profoundly successful, to act as if one were a thing, an impenetrable object — the self that «need be no more original than a stone» (PR 159).

Too often the world sees the strangeness of the religious right not where the New Testament places it — in the scandal of the Gospel — but in a willingness to say outrageous things on television.

The way I see it «created order» or what some might call the way, the Holy Spirit what Ghandi called truth force or love force, is something prophets have connection with which often times puts them at odds with the world and some losing their lives because of it.

I saw a cultural Christianity with preachers who often gained audiences, locally in church meetings or globally on television, by saying crazy and buffoonish things, simply to stir up the base and to gain attention from the world, whether that was claiming to know why God sent hurricanes and terrorist attacks or claiming that American founders, one of whom possibly impregnated his own human slaves and literally cut the New Testament apart, were orthodox, Evangelical Christians who, like us, stood up for traditional family values.

This is because evangelicals, for all our good work in fighting sex trafficking and the exploitation of women around the world, often fail to see the sexism that pervades our own church corridors.

For a while now I've been wanting to concoct this image of defiance that I see prevails in the world and often in my own heart.

Polkinghorne's scientific background is everywhere evident; often he uses examples from the laboratory: the historical appearance of Jesus in the world is seen in terms of the apparently undramatic discovery of penicillin on a windowsill; the two natures in Christ find a possible parallel in the wave / particle duality of light, and Dirac's equation concerning quantum mechanics is used in reference to the doctrine of the Trinity.

Here, however, it is not the rules and regulations, but the spirit found within those dedicated to the life apart from the world, the inner experiences which came to them, often seen in contrast to the life of the everyday world to which they once belonged.

It is seen as a fruit in many parts of the world and treated as such, with chocolate sauce often smothering it.

Because art often takes a little piece of your heart with it, making it visible for the world to see.

But WrestleMania is the convergence of all the biggest fans from all over the world in one spot, and that's something you don't see very often.

Or perhaps it was that period of 9 years from 1986 when we won the league twice, the fa cup once, the league cup twice and the cup winners cup, but played the most boring football the world has ever seen, more often than not finishing outside the top 6

I often lose sight of all the good the wrestlers can do in the world we never really get to see.

Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off

Don't see how Vardy solves that problem cause he's not world class and doesn't finish from tight spaces very often.