Sentences with phrase «often than i planned»

May you return here more often than planned.

Going to be one I will have to order it much more often than I planned!

What I found was that I wasn't hauling passengers as often as I thought and was hauling / towing things more often than I planned.

Not exact matches

They are found more often among entrepreneurs and chief executives — the very people who put incentive plans in place to optimize performance — than in the population at large.

They never learned how often starting anything, no matter how rudimentary, leads to finishing it more effectively than planning perfection.

All too often, I see principals of advisory firms convince themselves that they have a succession plan in place when, in fact — more often than not — what they have is more of a vague idea of what they hope will happen.

Luckily, though, there are many countries where, as a legal resident, you can qualify for a local healthcare plan that's often more comprehensive and less costly than Medicare.

As I often say, having a plan, even an imperfect one, is better than not having a plan at all.

Planning for your vacation should be fun and exciting, but more often than not, it's just plain stressful.

They can often see planning as tedious and place more emphasis on the quality time spent, rather than the destination or experiences.

In marketing and in sales, listening can often bring you far greater feedback than talking, so plan and act accordingly.

More often than not, they just let you pass, and if they stop you, tell security you're planning on upgrading at the terminal (which in my case is always the truth).

«And millennials, a generation known for switching jobs often, are more than 25 times more likely to say they plan to stick around when they feel they have a great place to work,» he writes.

When prom - related plans fail to be anything less than perfect — the prom group falling through, realizing your dress is all wrong the night before the dance, getting a date who doesn't understand what a «corsage» is — it can often seem a lot worse than it really is.

Running my own agency, As hard as I try, I still find myself putting out day - to - day fires more often than I'm actually doing long - term strategic planning.

Often people want to continue working until later in life, but the survey found that 50 % of retirees left the workforce earlier than planned, and of those, 60 % left because of health or disability problems and 27 % because changes in their company such as downsizing or closure.

In fact, 62 percent of consumers report using their smartphones more than previous years to research holiday shopping, and 60 percent of consumers say that they plan to buy more often from smartphones or tablets.

You often need more than good intentions for a solid business plan.

Borrowers will pay more over the life of the loan than in a standard repayment plan, although monthly payments are often lower due to the extended repayment term.

And while federal loans come with their own set of challenges and risks, all 1.37 million private loan borrowers are often subject to fewer protections and less flexible repayment plans than those offered under federal loan agreements.Less accommodating repayment options and more rigid terms can quickly lead to private student loan defaults, which is a dangerous financial place to be.

These plans have less oversight than 401 (k) s and people are often pushed toward very expensive choices like tax - deferred annuities, variable annuities and indexed annuities — all major screw jobs in my opinion.

«He's lost money more often than he's made money, and it's all part of his long - term plan,» he said.

If the plan provider is with a relatively inexpensive custodian that uses index funds like Vanguard's or Fidelity's, often these fund companies will have much cheaper expense ratios for firms that do business with them than what an adviser may be able to offer.»

It is perhaps best thought of as a movement of peoples, some of whom define themselves doctrinally, some by polity, but who cohere often on the basis of shared memories, practical necessity (e.g., clerical pension plans) and — more than one might have expected — ethnicity.

But the lack of «fit» between my dad's theology and the choices of others who had a role in planning elements in the worship service were more often than not due to well - intended but theologically unfortunate inclinations.

God's plan is often bigger than ours.

He might have offended his critics less if he had more often used the analogy he gave James G. Blaine when explaining his course on Reconstruction: â $ ˜The pilots on our Western rivers steer from point to point as they call itâ $» setting the course of the boat no further than they can see; and that is all I propose to myself in this great problem.â $ ™ â $ œBoth statements suggest Lincolnâ $ ™ s reluctance to take the initiative and make bold plans; he preferred to respond to the actions of others.

Supporters of the need for Trump's plan often cite the well - documented fact that ISIS has committed genocide against Christians and other minorities, yet the US refugee program has resettled far more Muslims than Christians from Syria, as noted by Kirsten Powers and others.

More often than not, we spend Thanksgiving at home, which means I'm in charge of planning the menu, so I'm always looking for delicious new dishes to supplement our traditional Thanksgiving menu.

Would rather buy it all in bulk in one single trip and then I can take advantage of any multi-buy offers if needed — I keep seeing list after list of daily plans but no shopping list, I have to go through it all and spend hours to find each ingredient amount into a spreadsheet and add it all together and buy the corresponding pack of each thing to the right size as required — often realising that it will cost me more than # 200 a month just for the food and then refuse to do the diet because of the cost, for the unemployed this is way too expensive.

More often than not, she's alone in the kitchen, even as the rest of us start to dig into the meal she's likely been planning for weeks.

As per the report, Guardiola has insisted that Aguero remains part of his plans, but with one man leading the line, it looks as though Jesus will more often than not get the nod as he seems a better fit in the Spanish tactician's system and ideology.

We go into games most often than not without plan B. Teams can get a head start and prepare against us because they know we always go with a 4 -2-3-1 formation.

The best thing about Mourinho is that he analyses the opposition and has a plan in place to exploit their weaknesses and more often than not it works.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Roquan will often slip the blocker, which leaves him in a tougher situation than being able to stack and shed the block would, but he at least has an awareness of where the ball carrier is and has a plan to try to get to him, or leverage him to a teammate.

players like Ozil always present the fans with a bit of a conundrum, especially when times are tough... if you look around the sporting world every once in awhile there emerges a player with incredible skill, like Ozil, Matt Sundin or even Jay Cutler, who have a different way about themselves... their movement seemed almost too lackadaisical, so much so that it seemed to suggest indifference or even disinterest on the part of the player... their posture always appears somewhat mopey and they generally have an unflattering «sour puss» expression on their face... for some their above average skills are enough to keep them squarely in the mix, as their respective teams try desperately to find a way to get the best out of them visa vie player acquisitions or the reworking of tactics... when things go according to planned the fans usually find a way to accept their unique disposition, whereas when things go awry they become easy targets for fans and pundits alike... in the case of Ozil and Sundin, their successes on the international stage and / or with their former teams led many to conclude that if we surrounded such talented individuals with players that have those skills that would most likely bring the best of these players success would surely follow... unfortunately both the Maple Leafs and our club chose to adopt half - measures, as each were being run by corporations who valued profitability over providing the best possible product on the field... for them, they cared more about shirt sales and season tickets than doing whatever was necessary... this isn't, by any stretch, an attempt to absolve Ozil of any responsibility for his failures on the pitch... there is no doubt oftentimes his efforts were underwhelming, to say the least, but this club has been inept when it comes to providing this prolific passer with the kind of players necessary for him to flourish... with our poor man's version of Benzema up front, the headless chickens in Walcott, the younger Ox and Welbeck occupying wide positions far too often and the fact that Carzola, who provided Ozil with great service and more freedom to roam, was never truly replaced, the only real skilled outlet on the pitch was Sanchez... remember to be considered a world - class set - up man goals need to be scored and for much of his time here he has been surrounded by some incredibly inept finishers... in the end, I'm not sure how long he will be in North London, recent sentiments and his present contract situation seem to suggest that he will depart at season's end, but how tragic would it be if once again we didn't put our best foot forward and failed to make those moves that could have brought championship football back to our once beloved club... so when you think about this uniquely skilled player don't be so quick to shift all the blame on his shoulders because he will not be the first or the last highly skilled player to find disappointment at the Emirates if we don't rid the club of those individuals that are truly to blame for our current woes

Nor does the problem seem to be abating; Wenger is often making up solutions from game to game, rather than developing a better plan.

Loss or reduction of milk supply due to incorrect sucking movements occurs often, so that bottle feeding may be introduced earlier than planned.

And family rates are often a better deal than individual plans.

No matter what your plan is in advance of baby's arrival, that seven - pound bundle often has a bigger vote about where to sleep than you do!

The biggest lesson I was taught through all of this is that things usually don't go as planned and, more often than not, we have to let go of any preconceived notions that we have and just roll with the punches!»

Children often do not have much control over the parenting plans and scheduling, so giving them control over the activities and traditions helps them look forward to the holidays rather than dread the changes.

We plan on having a process in place whereby we can ensure you get there asap, often resulting in little difference than the time you would be seen if you were in hospital.

Children tire easily, so plan to stop and explore more often than not.

Because we nursed I definitely feel like I delayed introducing foods a little longer than I should have, not because I intentionally planned to, but because nursing was easy, often, and was enough to sustain her.

Communication ~ Children have their own «inner world» of thoughts and plans and problems and worries and hopes and dreams that are occupying their time and attention, so a lack of cooperation is often simply the result of having a different agenda than we do.

Natural family planning methods are also an option, though these often have a higher failure rate than barrier methods.

«When supplementation occurs very early, very often and replaces feedings before lactation is well established,» notes La Leche League International, «it can result in a much shorter breastfeeding experience than the mother planned.»

They usually don't understand the possible implications of the major abdominal surgery, and they often believe that a planned, surgical delivery is safer than vaginal delivery.