Sentences with phrase «often than those without»

What's more, profiles with photos get browsed eight times more often than those without photos.
The two - mode hybrid system provides assistance from electric motors allowing the HEMI V - 8 to remain in four - cylinder mode more often than without a hybrid powertrain, improving overall fuel economy.
A survey of 1,000 Medicare patients found that 40 percent of all respondents with pets went to the doctor far less often than those without a canine friend around.
Microchipped pets find their way back home about 75 percent of the time; in the case of dogs, that's about 2.5 times more often than those without microchips, according to the study.

Not exact matches

Without this context, choosing one color over another doesn't make much sense, and there is very little evidence to support that «orange» will universally make people purchase a product more often than «silver».
Rather than helping treat the symptoms often associated with tooth sensitivity, this toothpaste is intended to provide gentle but effective cleaning that leaves your mouth healthy without causing any undue pain that harsher chemicals sometimes create.
To a certain extent, the ability to prove a product without significant outside investment is industry - specific — thanks to cloud computing and lower development costs, it has become cheaper than ever to launch a software firm — but it's also a privilege most often afforded to those with deep pockets.
Without a doubt, the best business leaders are smart, often with advanced business degrees, a great pedigree and more certifications than a business card can hold.
Common employee perks include health insurance, reduced gym memberships, bonuses, stock options, or commission, and they often inspire employees to accept less than they would without such benefits.
So that more often than not employees learn about new campaigns at the same time they are released to the rest of the world, if not later, without any additional context.
Like slot - based intersections, roundabouts allow many more cars to enter an intersection at the same time than traditional stoplights do, often without having to come to a stop.
«I often see highly skilled open - source professionals being able to command 10 - 15 percent higher salaries than other professionals without open - source experience.»
If you run some calculations, you'll often find that you'll get far more value out of a card with an annual fee than a card without one.
Interest - only loans often have rates about.25 percent higher than loans without this feature.
It often seems as the «share» the details of this relationship that Jesus is more like a child's imaginary friend who is always on their side when any conflict occurs with others rather than the Jesus who loved people enough to tell them, without accusing or withdrawing affection, the hard truths they needed to know to encourge them to make more meaningful choices.
Lay Church - goers seeking consolation rather than understanding from their religion often form «lord of the flies» packs to silence they fellow lay persons who refuse to drink the KoolAid without an explanation for why they should do so.
I've often been told that the reason I have a problem with the idea of people suffering eternally without the chance to be saved is because my sense of justice has been perverted by my sin nature, that it only seems unfair to me because «God's ways are higher than our ways.»
I think a big thing about being spiritual is believing in something higher than yourself without being tied to some arbitrarily specific moral code created by people (not God (s)-RRB- in the context of their times that often has horrifyingly backwards and incredibly immoral rules.
I need to emphasize the actuality of the superject (or, what is the same, the superjective existence of the actuality) because the misinterpretation of the principle of process has often gone hand in hand with the mistaken belief that «actuality» can be properly predicated of an occasion only while it is in the process of becoming.3 This widespread and deeply rooted mistake deserves more attention than I can give it here without digressing extensively from my main thesis.
Whatever balance may be struck in these areas of mixed secular and religious services funded by tax money, the mixture is inherently unstable and will tend to move in one direction or the other, usually toward increased responsiveness to broader interests than those of the sponsoring church (which is often called «secularization»)-- a process seen in church - related colleges and hospitals even without tax funding, which merely makes it happen quicker and sometimes with the force of law.
If we step back and forget everything we think we know about church, and read the texts without such filters, they say something very different than often assumed.
America uses the death penalty for violent offenders and murderers... where Iran uses it for innocents and in all reality whoever they chose often without cause other than control.
In the process, it often incorporates — without criticism — the values of the social environment, becoming, in fact, little more than the legitimizer of its social context.
Quite often the leadership are just as deceived if not more so than the following — without a sweet clue as to how they are being used to coerse others.
The inseparability of the two loves has been less manifest in theological analysis than in the actuality of history but theology has pointed out often enough how the thought of God is impossible without thought of the neighbor and how the meaning and value of the companion's life depends on his relation to God.
People fear displeasing their pastor, since his is «the man of God,» and so often do what he says without question, because he speaks for God and knows what God wants better than they do themselves.
Without the growth group, anxiety from direct encounters with injustice - bred rage often produces defensiveness rather than openness to new understanding.
But they do not consider that the Christian Church has much to say to them on the subject — perhaps with justice, since so often, in Christian circles, prayer has become little more than a formal exercise without deep significance for this or that particular man or woman.
I often go longer than I mean to between posts although long ago gave up trying to keep up with all the bloggers that post without fail each week (or each day)!
We go into games most often than not without plan B. Teams can get a head start and prepare against us because they know we always go with a 4 -2-3-1 formation.
We play with overlapping fullbacks, without defensive cover in the midfield than we are often exposed if we loose the ball high on the pitch and fullbacks are out of position.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
2 sell them 3 Buy a kid no one knows about and who most often than not will become an average plater 4 Run down the transfer window 5 sell bullocks to the fans or bid for a suarez without having any intention of buying.
More often than not, the player without the ball has the advantage of moving more freely than the player with the ball and obviously it depends on the quality of the players involved.?
No Palace player has scored more than five goals this season — without finishers to feed, Zaha's dribbling has often come to nought.
Personally, I do nt share the trust you have in Gibbs defensively, whilst I must say he is way better than Clichy going forward I think he often looks unsure of himself without the ball and isnt sure he is where he should be and this may be down to the fact that he was never a defender coming up, he was a winger and Wenger only moved him back since his arrival on the scene in the CC, so, for me, Traore is the safer option for now with Gibbs been suited to games where we may be less exposed and given more time to learn what the positons all about.
If you're going to feed your baby fruits, actual whole fruit is much better than juices, which often contain added sugar without any nutritional benefit.
Not every woman can do that without feeling diminished, although that often has more to do with societal messages than the way we really feel.
But men who have kids outside of marriage, often African - American men and those without college degrees, are even less likely to be involved in their lives than divorced dads, they note.
More often than not when buying a stroller, we consider practicality, cost and convenience without consulting anyone about what's developmentally best for our babies.
More often than not, Fitted Diapers are gathered with elastic (encased or not) at the thighs and waist and secure with velcro and snaps on the wrap - around wings; there are a few versions without snaps or velcro closures that require a diaper pin, snappi fastener or a wrap - style diaper cover to secure them to baby.
It might be a tad intellectually dishonest, but more often than not I can give the impatient primigravida a rationale (a 45 % C / S rate) why I am not scheduling her induction without her muttering what an unsympathetic doctor I am and what bad «bedside manner» I have.
Moms who give birth without pain meds are often touted as self - proclaimed birth gurus who think that women who deliver with meds or via C - section are somehow less motherly than they are.
Toddlers can feed themselves more easily without the bowl slipping and sliding all over the high chair tray (and more often than not, landing food - side - down on the floor!)
Young children in Japan are given greater freedom than their US counterparts and often get themselves to and from school without parental help.
Regarding babies and sleep: Yes, we are used to community living, but even without that, mothers who co-sleep report better sleep than those who don't, often because babies will rouse, nurse, and fall back asleep and sometimes Mom doesn't even notice.
Almost without exception, studies on formula feeding, breastfeeding, and sleep find that breastfed babies wake up more often than formula fed ones at night, and breastfeeding mothers therefore get LESS uninterrupted nighttime sleep.
This secures the wrap often tighter than a knot but without the added pressure of a large knot against your chest or back.
She will often go all day without eating anything (other than frequent nursing when she needs it).
Co-sleeper Cots are often bigger than cribs but without the frills and fancies of a proper bed.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z