Too
often urban school systems begin initiatives and never perfect them, preferring new initiatives that attract publicity and give the appearance of doing something.
Not exact matches
Because of the size of city
school districts — New York City is the nation's largest
school system with 1,189 public
schools and 78,100 teachers —
urban educators
often teach large numbers of at - risk students.
If choice through vouchers can create conditions that promote academic achievement, and if it can put political pressure on what are
often intractable
urban school systems, it merits serious consideration.
I recognize that even in suburban districts some GT programs are poorly run and other issues can exist, but to simply say that «for
urban schools, the standard G and T
system is
often a waste of time» is a truly ridiculous conclusion.
«
Schools are very diverse, and too
often we look at the education
system through the lens of a large
urban school and we don't consider what it might mean to implement this in a smaller rural
school without those opportunities for savings.»
The U.S. Department of Education, which has
often highlighted the District's
school system as a model for
urban school reform, was lukewarm.
African American youth in
urban centers
often reside in poorly resourced communities and face structural disadvantage, which can result in higher rates of poor behavioral health factors such as mental health problems, juvenile justice
system involvement, substance use, risky sex and lower
school engagement.