Sentences with phrase «oil funds skeptics»

Gelbspan just didn't credit Lancaster for the «big oil funds skeptics» tip.

Not exact matches

Saw the movie, wasn't at all surprised to see the usual menagerie of oil industry funded skeptics as mouth pieces for the film.
jeremy, the amount of skeptics» funding from oil companies is a tired nostrum; the big money is to be made from the trillions to be siphoned from cap and trade offsets, carbon taxes to be collected, academic «research» grants to co2 warriors, etc. not to mention al gore's recently closed (filled!)
Senators Demand that the Worlds Largest Oil Maker Make Public Its History of Funding Climate Change «Skeptics»
It is frequently alleged that climate skeptics are being funded by big oil — and that their views should therefore not be trusted.
Those on the other side may say there is no problem, that they are the enlightened few saving the planet from the evil skeptics funded by big oil, but we can always hope that over time some new standards will develop.
I'm not one who believes skeptics are «funded by Big Oil,» which seems cartoonishly reductive to me.
The flow of funds to AGW supporters from the Oil or Green Energy industries is, however, very easy to trace, and is far larger than all the funding of «skeptic» researchers combined.
Do you honestly believe that big oil is funding skeptics anywhere near on the scale that big green and governments are funding compliant scientists?
The fact that the coal and oil boys make more money doesn't mean they spend it on research and funding skeptics...
And about funding in general, over the pasty 20 year 50 BILLION has been funneled into some form of AGW, with less than 2 - 3 million from «Big Oil» funding the skeptics.
Junior Wakefield wrote: And about funding in general, over the pasty 20 year 50 BILLION has been funneled into some form of AGW, with less than 2 - 3 million from «Big Oil» funding the skeptics.
UCS report finds that the oil company spent nearly $ 16 million to fund skeptic groups and create confusion around the certainty of global warming.
The idea is that funding global warming skeptics has enabled oil companies to influence congressional action, which is something only Big Green is allowed to do.
Regarding the essay by Judith Curry, her account of history alludes to skeptics in the 1980s or 1990s being funded by Big Oil.
Back in 2007, a giant 176 page official complaint was lodged at Ofcom, (the UK's communications regulator of broadcasts) about skeptic climate scientists seen in the British video «The Great Global Warming Swindle», and the complaint went so far as to include its criticism of Dr Soon's non-speaking contribution to the film, while noting his «big oil» funding.
ExxonMobil is sabotaging the work of more than 2,000 scientists from 100 countries by funding the most visible «greenhouse skeptics» — one of whom, S. Fred Singer, publicly denied receiving oil industry money as recently as February, 2001.
Something legitimate for the hard work and non-funded by the big oil, the big coal and remotely from the Government fund to skeptics.
Given all that I've dug up on the origins of the «industry - corrupted skeptic climate scientists» accusation, I'd call it a can't - lose wager if you bet that the «e-mail message circulated at a U.S. climate research lab» which Myanna Lahsen referred to owes its «funded by the oil and coal industry» accusation against skeptic climate scientists to Gelbspan / Ozone Action.
(Reuters)- Willie Soon, a U.S. climate change skeptic who has also discounted the health risks of mercury emissions from coal, has received more than $ 1 million in funding in recent years from large energy companies and an oil industry group, according to Greenpeace.
Mention those skeptics are funded by «big coal & oil», and you'll gain more adoration as someone who exposes sinister hidden truths.
Soon is a prominent climate change skeptic who has received much of his research funding from the oil and gas industry.
The global warming community spends a lot of time with ad hominem attacks on skeptics, usually accusing them of being in the pay of oil and power companies, but they all know that their own funding in turn would dry up rapidly if they were to show any bit of skepticism in their own work.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z