Sentences with phrase «oil money because»

The fight over clean energy and climate policy in California is dripping with out - of - state oil money because the oil billionaires want to stamp out the progress that has been made to move toward clean energy and energy efficiency, and keep us addicted to their fossil fuels.

Not exact matches

That is because banks, private - equity firms and institutional investors have continued to pour money into the sector even as oil companies slashed billions of dollars in spending from their budgets and laid off more than 100,000 workers.

Energy companies frequently «flare» or burn off vast supplies of methane at drilling sites because it earns less money than oil.

Because of that, it can make money in almost any oil price environment.

The North African country is not looking for a production freeze, because, as Mustafa Sanalla, chairman of the National Oil Corporation, said last week: «Without a resumption of exports we could run out of money next year.»

But if oil gets too high, that's a problem as well, because then people have no more money to spend for expendable income, because they're putting it all into their gas tank.

It's no research study, but unfortunately, there aren't many credible studies going on to prove coconut oil's worth because there's not much money in it (you can't patent a natural ingredient).

After watching this film last spring, I made the decision to drastically cut my use of vegan butter (and any product containing unethically sourced palm oil) because money speaks, yo.

The oil I wipe away is a waste of money because of poor bottle design and choice by Nutiva.

Because he's not a household, and because we didn't pay oil money for him, people still think we need someonBecause he's not a household, and because we didn't pay oil money for him, people still think we need someonbecause we didn't pay oil money for him, people still think we need someone else.

He is the same guy who the board thinks is better than Alisher Usmanova because Usmanova got his money from oil.

He doesn't want to spend anything because he is happy with his returns... He doesn't have ambition to win PL or CL... There is difference between owner of Man Utd and Arsenal... Man Utd is also having Business money unlikely Chelsea and Man City who are having oil money in their Bank accounts....

Its right that it is ambition but you should consider the amount of Money so called Pep has spent because of oil king owner... You can not go and randomly compare the situation... Wenger is bad in recent years but it doesn't mean that Pep is world class... Look at his record??

The vast majority of fans want Wenger gone because they have not come to terms with the effect the oil money had on the natural pecking order and because he is a victim of his over achieving in his early years leading to unwarranted expectations.

Its nice to see some people have open there eyes but all is true lets ask our selves have this team change from last season where are the experienced players that wenger talked about he selling us bull and every season he gets away with it the fans deserve better am from the caribbean so chance r i might never get to see arsenal live at the emirates because its too expensive at least the club should be winning things i know its important to balance the books you must BUT football is about trophies as well and thats were the balance lies how the hell can we go Six (6) seasons yes 6 without a trophy not even a FA cup or carling cup and no one says a word about the manager that is rubbish Arsenal live in the past too much the time is now this season for me is the absolute last for wenger to win something i do nt care how much money he has made the club and Wenger if you cant bring that then go work for an oil company and make them money and leave arsenal to a manager who is willing to win something not only buy players for 10 million who take 10 years to develop am frustrated with this man.

Now, the story of NIPOST is such that for many years; because of the black oil, that money spinner, we literally abandoned all other areas of revenue generating capacities.

The reason for which some of those plants were not producing and meeting our needs were because there were debts owed them, there were crude oil financing needs that money was not being made available to finance.

If the mining sector is abandoned because money is coming in through the increase in price and output of oil, there will continue to be problems.»

In his estimation, anybody who reposes confidence in the words of the President on the matter will eventually be disappointed because it is not possible to fund Free SHS from oil money.

Niger deltans should resist this foolish move because it is their oil money that will be used to finance these useless states that will be created.

Oil spills and crime, for example, increase GDP because money must be spent on clean - up and replacement of lost goods, yet few would claim that they increase the general well - being of a state.

Oil companies that today pay for CO2 to be delivered from natural deposits are in danger of losing money, because the current price of oil is so lOil companies that today pay for CO2 to be delivered from natural deposits are in danger of losing money, because the current price of oil is so loil is so low.

Regarding Keystone, I myself think it is clear that Obama should say no to Keystone, because it is something in his power to do, which would have some effect on retarding development of the tar sands (despite what the flawed State Department EIS [Environmental Impact Statement] said), and because we really wouldn't get any significant benefit from saying yes; no real oil security, few permanent jobs, and most of the money goes to Canada and to refiners in free - trade zones.

Because I don't know enough science to debate contrarians scientifically, I usually fall back on: Suppose the mainstream climate scientists are wrong & the contrarians right, and we act as if the scientists are right, then we have nothing to lose & something to gain in terms of reducing other environmental harms (acid rain, local pollution), resource depletion, and increasing national security (re oil wars & protection), and lots of money to save from energy / resource efficiency & conservation, and increasing from alternative energy.

Can not find grass fed butter anywhere so I'm using Nutiva Organic Coconut Oil with Non Dairy Butter Flavor because it is cheaper or you get more for your money than the Organic Grass Fed Ghee I first purchased.

Extracted from the seed of a beautiful African forest tree, we're huge fans of Yangu Oil because of its inherent ultraviolet protection and high content of fatty acids and antioxidants that give the sun's damaging rays a run for their money!

The film points out that the culture of financial malfeasance at Enron was evident as far back as 1987, when Lay apparently encouraged the outrageous risk taking and profit skimming of two oil traders in Enron's Valhalla office because they were bringing a lot of money into the company.

I haven't changed the catalic converters on my pilot yet because I figured it would be a waste of money if they are going to get covered with oil and go out again; I may want to wait.

The Saudi need for money is a much simpler explanation than trying to knock out US shale oil, or gouge the Iranians, because it has the Saudis acting directly in their own interests, and it fits the price series for crude oil better.

The chief strategist for Canada at BlackRock Inc., the world's largest money manager, doesn't see a single attractive sector in the local stock market because oil prices will stay low.

Because of the size of the system this is quite indirect and works only until real economic output (oil, manufacture, services etc.) pushes the money supply on an exponential level.

In college I spent a whole lot of money on expensive oil paints and canvases and then became afraid to use them because they were so expensive.

And part of what happened in the U.S. auto industry was because oil appeared relatively cheap, the U.S. auto industry decided we're just going to make our money on SUVs, and we're not going to worry about fuel efficiency.

Because I don't know enough science to debate contrarians scientifically, I usually fall back on: Suppose the mainstream climate scientists are wrong & the contrarians right, and we act as if the scientists are right, then we have nothing to lose & something to gain in terms of reducing other environmental harms (acid rain, local pollution), resource depletion, and increasing national security (re oil wars & protection), and lots of money to save from energy / resource efficiency & conservation, and increasing from alternative energy.

We simply won't have the money because it will have been shipped overseas to foreign oil producers.

Coal and oil won't lose money, but we will have to pay much more for it because a protection racket is getting into the game.

«The current understanding of this situation by some IPCC proponents is that the forces of evil (oil companies and all that) are causing problems for scientists because they want to make money.»

Because this process has been corrupted by the money and power of Big Oil since the beginning,» said John Sellers

It goes like this: The good scientists agree that global warming is human induced and would be addressed if America ratified the Kyoto global warming pact, while bad heretical scientists question climate models that predict Armageddon because they are venal and corrupted by oil money.

Because oil money, or just the faintest whiff of it, trumps the scientific method every time.

It's because of subsidies and money fiddles; and because those things suck and will have to be massively supplemented by the products of... Big Oil!

But oil is the key to the energy / climate problem, because oil is where the money is.

Sixth, they say Heartland is «funded by polluting industries», by which I assume they mean a bit of money Mobil Oil gave Heartland some years ago... but since Mobil also gives money to Stanford University, many times the money that Mobil gave to Heartland, is Stanford University now suspect because it is «funded by polluting industries»?

BTW, if you have some inside knowledge on how I made money off of my studies on oil, let me know, because I must have missed the check in the mail.

They come at a vital time because for every major city like New York or Paris moving huge amounts of money and using their political power to take on Big Oil, we need dozens of successful divestment campaigns on our campuses, and hundreds of grassroots organisers to win arguments in our communities.

But breaking the power of oil companies may be even harder because the sums of the money on the other side are so fantastic — there are trillions of dollars worth of oil in Canada's tar sands and the North Dakota shale.

«It's true that governments by and large have been politically paralyzed because the energy companies, the coal companies, the oil companies, the coal - burning utilities, they have spent enormous amounts of money and they have succeeded in many countries in paralyzing the political process,» the former vice president said.

It's not about the environment and all about the royalties: Money Received From Leases Far Lower Than Conventional Oil Salazar called the leases «flawed» because the 5 % royalty rate paid for oil shale production on those lands «sells the taxpayers short&raquOil Salazar called the leases «flawed» because the 5 % royalty rate paid for oil shale production on those lands «sells the taxpayers short&raquoil shale production on those lands «sells the taxpayers short».

In this conference, they're going to try to take our money and send it to third - world countries because of, since we spend so much oil and these other countries have suffered, then were going to give our money to these third - world countries.

Think about the cost in materials, money and to the environment of oil and gas platforms and this cost is always there because most workers are transported by helicopters which burn fuel and cost money.