Not exact matches
«There's a question of whether going along with the approval of the Northern Gateway pipeline will make LNG
development in B.C. more challenging by angering First Nations so adamantly opposed to the
oil sands pipeline,»
said George Hoberg, a professor at the University of British Columbia's school of forestry and founder of UBCC350, a group pressing for action on greenhouse gas emissions.
«In light of growing trends, and following the decisions made today, the government of Canada has determined that foreign state control of
oil sands development has reached the point at which further such foreign state control would not be of net benefit to Canada,» Harper
said.
They point to an article that you wrote in March, I think, of 2012 in Policy Options, where you basically
said, dirty
oil, the tar
sands it's called, dirty
oil and the future of our country, where you argue that the
development of the, as you use the word, tar
sands, it's become a political term, by the way, as you know, is basically not necessarily good for the country, in fact it takes jobs away in the manufacturing sector of Ontario.
Regarding Keystone, I myself think it is clear that Obama should
say no to Keystone, because it is something in his power to do, which would have some effect on retarding
development of the tar
sands (despite what the flawed State Department EIS [Environmental Impact Statement]
said), and because we really wouldn't get any significant benefit from
saying yes; no real
oil security, few permanent jobs, and most of the money goes to Canada and to refiners in free - trade zones.
We still don't know enough about tar
sand oil, or bitumen, which takes longer to break down due to its high viscosity, but doesn't spread, we also don't know much about the behavior of
oil from a blowout, such as the Deepwater Horizon BP blowout, and we know little of how crude
oil behaves in the Arctic Ocean, where there is ice, or how to remediate it,»
said Michel Boufadel, director of NJIT's Center for Natural Resources
Development and Protection and a member of the panel of experts charged with evaluating the impact of spills in Northern waters.
Aerosols from the production of heavy
oil is a growing climate and pollution concern because new tar
sands developments are on the drawing board in Venezuela, Utah and elsewhere, the study
says.
Opponents
say it will foster the
development of Alberta's
oil sands, which will in turn emit more heat - trapping carbon dioxide when burned and thus exacerbate global warming.
Keystone XL Pipeline: A Potential Mirage for
Oil - sands Investors shows «new Canadian oil - sands development is increasingly economically questionable without the additional export capacity that pipelines such as KXL would bring», says Mark Lewis, external research advisor to Carbon Track
Oil -
sands Investors shows «new Canadian
oil - sands development is increasingly economically questionable without the additional export capacity that pipelines such as KXL would bring», says Mark Lewis, external research advisor to Carbon Track
oil -
sands development is increasingly economically questionable without the additional export capacity that pipelines such as KXL would bring»,
says Mark Lewis, external research advisor to Carbon Tracker.
Despite environmentalists» campaign to end
oil sands development, crude from Alberta will be developed with or without the proposed Keystone XL pipeline,
says Gary Doer, Canada's ambassador to the U.S..
Opponents
say the proposed $ 5.4 billion pipeline would be a catalyst to unlocking
oil sands development in Alberta, Canada, where a dense, sticky hydrocarbon called bitumen is harvested by strip - mining and energy - intense steam - based techniques.
«When you have the
development of
oil sand deposits, there are vast landscapes that go on for miles that are barren and a lot of big lakes of toxic water that have been used in the process of extracting the
oil,»
said Jack Woodward, the lawyer representing them.
«New Canadian
oil -
sands development is increasingly economically questionable without the additional export capacity that pipelines such as Keystone XL would bring»,
says Mark Lewis, external research advisor to a report from Carbon Tracker, a think - tank focused on the investment risks posed by excessive fossil fuel extraction.