Sentences with phrase «oil shale e&p»

Close to Canada, North Dakota has a booming economy due to the Bakken oil shale fields located in the western half of the state.

Global law firm K&L Gates LLP successfully advised Karak International Oil, a subsidiary of U.K. company Jordan Energy & Mining Limited (JEML), on the signing of a US$ 1.8 billion oil shale retort concession agreement with the

Trowers & Hamlins LLP, the international law firm, has advised the Government of Jordan on the structuring and negotiation of a major oil shale concession agreement with Karak International Oil, an affiliate of Jordan Energy

Tuesday's release of proposed rules for oil shale exploration across the Rocky Mountain West by the Bureau of Land Management was merely another shot across the bow in the political blame game over $ 4 - per - gallon gas.

In what Treehugger writer John Laumer calls the Climate Trifecta,» Bullion Monarch Mining Co., is proposing to produce oil from oil shale using coal gasification, which they label as a «clean coal» technology.

Shell Oil's plan to acquire a junior water right for eight percent of Colorado's Yampa River average April - to - June flow for oil shale development has been opposed by some twenty - five parties, all submitting letters of opposition to the Colorado Water Court in Steamboat Springs.

1,000 MW coal fired plants to heat oil shale, tar sands expansion, enhanced oil recovery, etc..

The country's electricity production is 85 % based on non-conventional fossil oil shale and all oil - based motor fuels are imported.

We need our government to level with the public that alternatives to conventional petroleum, including unconventional resources such as oil sands and oil shale (if it can ever produced economically in the US), all cost more.

The conventional oil alternatives (oil sands, deepwater, oil shale, biofuels) don't have the same level of pure energetic value of those of the past, and this is the reason that oil prices must remain at current levels in order for new oil supplies to remain viable.

The most recent energy sector development strategies until 2030 do foresee maintaining the dependency on oil shale use in power production.

but also a fan of more oil shale development (nay!).

Reuters also reports that, separately, a DoI spokesperson indicated that plans to further develop oil shale deposits in the several Rocky Mountain states are also continuing.

Well, this one starts by opening up the North Slope of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil and gas leasing, clearing the way for oil shale development on public lands, and allowing offshore drilling on heretofore off - limits areas of the Atlanta and Pacific coasts - including, of course, California.

Withdrawing plans to allow development of oil shale and tar sands on 800,000 acres of federal public lands in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming.

Unbelievably, according to the LA Times, the oil shale extraction industry was included in the Federal $ 700 - billion bailout package.

Fully implement his Executive Order 13514 requiring all resource management agencies to fully consider climate pollution, like they do other types of pollution, prior to leasing or exporting onshore and offshore oil, gas, coal, and unconventional fuels sources such as oil shale and tar sands.

The best and cheapest thing to do is to make it illegal to take coal, oil shale and tar sands out of the ground.

Past efforts to get at the region's oil shale have involved strip - mining, a technique that proved both environmentally destructive and prohibitively expensive.

Using Hall's math, oil shale from Shell's electric heater method requires 1 boe of electricity to make 3 boe of shale oil.

Consider that we start to use lower - grades of oil and other fossil fuels that require greater investment in energy to extract and process the fuel (for example, tar sands and oil shale).

The existence of oil shale has been well known for decades.

At best, oil shale could begin producing oil in noticeable amounts by 2030; at worst, it could remain undeveloped forever because of its low net energy production.

«Using tar sands and oil shale as energy sources while ignoring climate disruption, air pollution, water pollution, resource depletion, and conservation measures is like pissing in the wind.»

It's no secret, and safe to say, that TreeHugger isn't supportive of extraction oil from tar sands in Canada (or from oil shale in the Rockies for the matter).

SLT reports that oil shale «has «great potential» and he may revise rules on harvesting that energy source «in the near future».»

I can see the energy independence pull on tapping into these fuel sources, but frankly any government which advocates developing oil shale or tar sands seriously loses its credibility in terms of its commitment to tackling climate change and on the environment more broadly.

Now, people point to the fact that we have oil shale and tar sands, and those are unconventional fossil fuels.

Plus, the need for more coal - fired or nuclear generation (see below for details) will have impacts far outside the immediate areas where oil shale projects are underway; and,

The impact statement, released Dec. 20, is an overview of possible impacts to full - scale oil shale development on nearly 2 million acres in the three states.

Oil Shale Development a Climate Change + Water Disaster In case you hadn't heard, developing oil shale is just as bad (if not worse in some ways) from an environmental perspective as tar sands.

For politicians in Alberta and a handful of western US states the so - called unconventional oil source known as oil or tar sands and oil shale is the energy trump card.

While the US does undoubtedly have a lot of oil shale, too bad its carbon emissions are eight times worse than gasoline.

In terms of additional greenhouse gas emissions, producing fuel from oil shale produces eight times the emissions of making fuel from conventional sources of petroleum.

It's not about the environment and all about the royalties: Money Received From Leases Far Lower Than Conventional Oil Salazar called the leases «flawed» because the 5 % royalty rate paid for oil shale production on those lands «sells the taxpayers short».

That EROEI similar to infinity that renewables possess makes cooking oil out of oil shale formations a completely reasonable thing to undertake.

rulings on oil shale were «misplaced», but ultimately Salazar still has said that he wants to make his own decisions on the matter with the first six months of the Obama presidency.

Secretary of Interior Ken Salazar may think that oil shale has great potential but at least he's scrapping plans put in place by the Bush Administration to lease additional lands in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming for more development of the carbon nightmare fuel.

Presumably the lower royalty rate would be place to make oil shale production more financial attractive and more of the unconventional source of fuel could be produced.

Still, there's a far cry from using up the rest of the oil to using all the oil + coal + tar sands + oil shale....

Here's the bad news: The Salt Lake Tribune reports that at a summit of Western state governors Salazar was all about oil shale.

This means it could be coal, oil shale, tar sands, nukes or renewables, and if you want to move into fantasy land, fusion.

Although the amount of convential oil will continue to decline, there are estimated 10 - 15 trillion barrels of oil equivalent in unconvential oil which include heavy and extra heavy crude oils and the oil shale and sand.

TreeHugger on oil shale A Return To Colorado Oil Shale?

Shell R and D has several project in northwestern Colorado the use in - situ resistive heating to crack kerogen in oil shale to a crude oil that can be pumped out of the formation.

And if you look at the water, climate change and depletion issues associated with both oil shale and coal production, you'll see that these energy resources do not provide an ounce of energy security... but just prolong the inevitable, while destroying even more of our natural capital.

While I'm not so sure his head's in the right place when it comes to oil shale, Secretary of Interior Ken Salazar certainly has been supportive of renewable energy.

America's oil shale revolution has occurred in spite of President Obama's attempts to block the widespread use of traditional, affordable energy resources.

With Tunisians protesting Shell's shale gas plans and Jordanians set to finalise a deal to build the region's first oil shale plant by the end of the year, it seems that the region is buying into shale.

§ 15927 («[I] t is the policy of the United States that... United States oil shale, tar sands, and other unconventional fuels are strategically important domestic resources that should be developed to reduce the growing dependence of the United States on politically and economically unstable sources of foreign oil imports -LSB-.]»)