The network's latest advocacy for fossil fuels comes on the 25th anniversary of the Exxon Valdez oil spill, the most environmentally devastating
oil tanker spill in American history.
Oil tanker spills would likely become a bigger risk with any pipelines that go to west coast tidewater.
Not exact matches
Although the particular coastline of Vancouver Island I was fishing this summer is not directly on the proposed
tanker route, any sizeable
oil spill along the north coast of British Columbia would have consequences here as well.
Four - in - five British Columbians are concerned about the expected increase in
oil tanker traffic at Kitimat and through the passage (83 %) and the risk of an
oil spill (80 %) if the Enbridge Northern Gateway is authorized.
Kinder Morgan bears no liability for
oil spills originating from a
tanker that docks at its
oil terminus, but this too should be changed, requiring the pipeline operator to share the liability as long as the
tanker is in Canadian waters.
Today is, not coincidentally, the 21st anniversary of the Exxon Valdez
oil spill, and on the heels of the ad came an announcement from the Coastal First Nations (an alliance of nine nations from the central coast to Haida Gwaii) declaring that»... in upholding our ancestral laws, rights and responsibilities...
oil tankers carrying crude
oil from the Alberta Tar Sands will not be allowed to transit our lands and waters.»
Whereas there have been a number of crude
oil spills at sea, there has never been a major
tanker spill involving dilbit.
VANCOUVER — The Christy Clark government has asked Ottawa to lift a ban on burning
oil to deal with
spills, proof that Christy Clark is prepared to do anything to allow a seven-fold increase in
tanker traffic on B.C.'s coast, say the...
State and federal inspectors have completed a second round of safety checks of train tracks and
oil tanker cars in an effort to prevent derailments and
spills of volatile crude from North Dakota's Bakken region.
The Exxon Valdez
oil tanker ran aground in Prince William Sound,
spilling an estimated 11 million gallons of crude
oil along Alaskan shores.
If a
tanker splits its hull and dumps
oil into the sea, trained teams show up with specialized gear to begin the process of stanching the flow and cleaning up the
spill.
The biggest
oil spill in U.S. history sparked improvements in
tanker construction and navigation technology, along with better crew training, but the danger remains
According to the unit's postmortem on the
spill, the national contingency plan for cleaning up
spills would not have coped if large quantities of the
tanker's cargo of crude
oil had come ashore.
However, tens of thousands of leaky auto engines whizzing over already polluted urban environments can't compare with the damage done to a pristine environment by a single
oil tanker such as the Exxon Valdez, which
spilled 10 million gallons of
oil into Prince William Sound in Alaska in 1989.
In 2005 they told the International
Oil Spill Conference in Miami that there are 8569 potentially polluting wrecks, 1583 of which were oil tanke
Oil Spill Conference in Miami that there are 8569 potentially polluting wrecks, 1583 of which were
oil tanke
oil tankers.
In 2001, an
oil tanker hit a reef in the Galapagos Islands and
spilled potentially disastrous amounts of
oil on one of the world's most historic nature reserves.
More than five years after the
oil tanker Exxon Valdez hit a reef off the coast of Alaska, the people who claim they were harmed by the massive
oil spill are finally having their day — or rather, their months — in court.
Methane hydrates, after all, were largely responsible for corrupting the containment dome intended to stop the 2010 Deepwater Horizon
oil spill rising from the ocean bottom; the viscous mixture clogged the dome and a redirection pipe intended to take leaking
oil to a
tanker waiting above.
Two summers ago a tropical storm rocked the USS Mississinewa — an
oil tanker torpedoed near Micronesia's Ulithi Atoll —
spilling 24,000 gallons of fuel and halting local subsistence fishing.
She points out what happened after the Exxon Valdez tragedy, where an
oil tanker caused a major
oil spill along the coast of Alaska in 1989.
Even in the absence of
oil and gas exploration, the Arctic's rapidly intensifying traffic — whether from barges, research ships,
oil tankers, or passenger cruises — makes
oil spills increasingly likely.
The study, which appears in the Annals of Internal Medicine, included 501 fishermen who helped clean up
spilled oil after the
tanker Prestige sank off the coast of Spain in November 2002.
After the Exxon Valdez
spill, all sorts of maritime regulations were instituted requiring all new
tankers to be double hull after 2006 because they are less likely to
spill oil.
When a barge dangerously laden with logging equipment, including a
tanker truck of diesel fuel,
spilled its load in the heart of the world's best known orca habitat — the Ecological Reserve at Robson Bight — last August 20th, whale lovers were outraged, environmentalists dismayed, the public alerted, and even the
oil industry took note.
A couple of years pass and a plant is erected where the
tanker was sunk to clean up the massive
oil spill that was left.
According to Friends of the Earth, «The bunker fuel
spills by the Hanjin container ship that hit a bridge in San Francisco Bay on Nov. 7 and the Russian
oil tanker that broke in half during a storm in the Black Sea on Nov. 11 call attention to the harm caused by bunker fuel when it is
spilled.
And with the way tar sands
oil sinks in water, a
tanker or pipeline
spill in the area would be devastating for the region.
1990: The first climate - related shareholder resolution at Exxon came a year after the
tanker Exxon Valdez ran aground in Alaska's Prince William Sound, creating what was then the nation's largest
oil spill and most notorious human - caused environmental disaster.
Incremental barrels would come from abroad by
tankers statistically more likely to
spill, or from ecologically damaging
oil sands, today's marginal supplier.
The
spill, estimated to be roughly 4,000 barrels (or 168,000 gallons), began after a
tanker vessel carrying heavy fuel
oil collided with a cargo ship in Galveston Bay, an estuary connected to the Gulf of Mexico.
He sent me a link to an article he wrote for the then fledgling BBC News website back in 1999, a few years after the
oil tanker Sea Empress ran aground on the coast of Wales,
spilling more than 72,000 tonnes of crude along a coastline that's a favourite for ramblers and nature enthusiasts, not to mention the fishing grounds.
Modern double hull
oil tankers are not as susceptible to
spills, but the many small ships (especially low budget, unlicensed ships) carrying goods of all types can and do run aground, causing smaller
spills.
In January 1993 a deep storm (the most intense system of low pressure outside the tropics ever recorded over the north Atlantic) miraculously broke up the
oil spilt from the
tanker Braer.
Neither personality addressed the fact that the Keystone XL pipeline is specifically designed to transport heavy crude to refineries and export - bound
oil tankers on the Gulf Coast, precisely the scenario that could lead to more
spills like the one unfolding in Galveston Bay.
IMO took over responsibility for this treaty in 1959, but it was not until 1967, when the
tanker Torrey Canyon ran aground off the coast of the United Kingdom and
spilled more than 120,000 tons of
oil into the sea, that the shipping world realized just how serious the pollution threat was.
In a separate but related occurrence that same month, the Yamuna Spirit
oil tanker, having arrived bearing crude
oil loaded at an Arabian port,
spills oil at the marine terminal in San Francisco Bay at the Phillips 66 Rodeo refinery.
Fill a
tanker with
oil and / or surfactant and
spill it on the ocean.
June 2017: Phillips 66 quietly initiates a permit revision process with local air district authorities to allow a 100 percent increase in
oil tanker deliveries to its marine terminal at their SF Bay Rodeo refinery — site of the Sept. 2016 Yamuna Spirit
oil spill.
The local air district and Phillips 66 still refuse to provide any information regarding the details of the cause of the Sept. 2016 Yamuna Spirit
spill, nor as to the source of
oil intended to be delivered with the increased
oil tanker traffic to the Phillips 66 SF Bay refinery.
«The bountiful and globally significant coastline can not bear an
oil spill... we declare that
oil tankers carrying crude
oil from the Alberta Tar Sands will not be allowed to transit our lands and waters.»
With the approval of the Kinder Morgan pipeline, we expect an increase in
tanker traffic by 700 % through the Salish Sea, meaning more
oil moving through pipelines and more export terminals, making Washington State a target for dangerous
spills and explosions.
We the signatories draw your attention to proposals by Enbridge, Kinder Morgan and CN Rail to expand crude
oil tanker traffic through B.C.'s coast to ship
oil to Asia, which would put B.C.'s abundant salmon rivers and coast at risk of
oil spills.
As a result of a fuel
tanker grounding and attendant
oil spill in 2001, a consortium of energy companies from the G7, calling themselves e7 (created to bring renewable energy to developing nations), funded the installation of three wind turbines on San Cristobal, an island in the Galapagos archipelago, to minimize the amount of fuel that had to be delivered to run the generators.
But as Exxon knows through the Exxon Valdez
oil spill, in which the
oil tanker veered off course into a rocky reef while trying to avoid small icebergs in Alaska's Prince William Sound in 1989, the presence of even a little ice makes navigation treacherous.
of an
oil spill in the Pacific Ocean if the Kinder Morgan pipeline and its
tanker terminal are built.
The
tanker Exxon Valdez, captained by the now infamous Joseph Hazelwood, ran aground on Prince William Sound's Bligh Reef,
spilling more than 10.8 million US gallons (40.9 million liters) of crude
oil into the sensitive natural coastline.
A massive
oil spill occurred in Texas on Sunday when an
oil tanker collided with two -LRB-!)
It's hard to believe so much time has passed since the
tanker dumped 11 million gallons of
oil into Alaska's Prince William Sound, but it's not surprising that the
spill's effects still linger.
Over 70 per cent of Burnaby residents are opposed to the expansion project, which will transport more diluted bitumen between Strathcona County (near Edmonton) and Burnaby, subsequently bringing 34 additional
tankers monthly through Vancouver's Burrard Inlet and increasing the risk of catastrophic
oil spills.
The proposed route for the
oil tankers travels through Heiltsuk and Kitasoo Xai» xais» territory, and the potential of an
oil spill along the
tanker route places the Nations» very way of life at risk.