As for the 3DS — well, this is the same
old argument as the PSP v DS era: whose games do you prefer?
Not exact matches
The after - tax income of state residents would, the
argument goes, be the same
as under the
old federal tax law.
As a friend pointed out to me yesterday, «because it is
old» isn't a very good
argument.
Economists are rightly skeptical of moral
arguments about market abuse,
as such
arguments are usually followed by legislation that protects companies of the
old, stodgy type from young upstarts or that just feathers a nonmarket or quasi-market nest.
Although I agree with you RiadaKram, that the posters
arguments were rather crude, at the same time, I'm afraid the tired
old «how many people did your side murder»
argument is equally
as crude.
Seems you get more and more desperate
as your standard
old (and badly flawed)
arguments get taken apart.
For a minute there I was wondering if Chad was going to trot out the
old «they are better off
as slaves»
argument
You called me out
as being disingenuous when I said «that
as time goes on however, I'm finding things that are helping to disprove things previously held
as fact among Christians», so I have provided you an example that not only wasn't it a disingenuous statement, but that I've done my homework, on both sides of the
argument, and came up with something that no one has been able to give me a response with even either the slightest chance of being possible, or falling back to the
old status qua of «mysterious ways» and «having faith».
Claiming it is «impossible» to get him to consider different points of view, exasperated acquaintances of local man Kyle Dunham told reporters Wednesday that the 34 - year -
old is completely unwilling to listen to even a single
argument as to why ho.mose.xuality is an abomination.
Gary,
As stated above, this is an
old outdated
argument concerning the moral code versus the civil code.
Obviously, so the
argument goes, if we want to cut teenage pregnancies and abortions we must have access to sexual health services — in other words, teenagers are less likely to get pregnant if they are using contraception; failing contraception, then we should give them access to the morning - after pill, which may be seen
as preferable to a twelve - year -
old getting pregnant.
Others have pointed to this
argument as a «might makes right»
argument and I've noted the
old axiom that «just because you can do something doesn't mean you should do something.»
In recent years
as I have gotten
older I have started investigating all religions so
as to understand the different
arguments.
Within Christianity it is
as old as Paul's
argument against circumcision.
The
old argument about the violin,
as a material thing, and the tune,
as a «spiritual» one, is a pretty fair indication of the position adopted.
One hates to make
old arguments, but if this education teaches (
as other sections of the report make clear that is must) the familiar doctrines about how very wrong it is to impose any kind of normative standard on the many forms that peoples» desires can take, on what basis does it exclude pornography or the sexualization of young girls
as legitimate forms of the varied human sexual appetite?
As if anticipating an objection, Miss Mac Donald brushes aside the
old argument that atheists are simply living off the spiritual capital of a distinctive Jewish and Christian civilization.
Nye's
argument falls in line with the vast majority of scientists, who date the age of the earth
as 4.5 billion years
old and the universe
as 14.5 billion years
old.
Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my
argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never
old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background
as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz
I had forgotten about the
old Ad Hominen
argument, learned back in my college years
as something to be avoided during debate.
The reader, who understands this, will also understand that our
argument has no interest in nor is affected by marginal and non-typicalcases (
as, for instance, the
older man who marries and may not be capable of actual insemination).
(Jeremiah 15:15) Moreover, the saving efficacy of good lives in a community had been an implicit corollary of the
old sense of social solidarity,
as is picturesquely evidenced in Yahweh's consent to Abraham's
argument that if there were even ten good men in Sodom it should not be destroyed.
I have not had to appeal to that
oldest and best
argument for the institution of academic tenure, the unqualified freedom of a scholar to move
as his or her research and thinking lead, without being bound by past assumptions or present colleagues.
Same
as: Children should not be thought right from wrong until they are
old enough to make decisions (and I do not mean this in a religious
argument) but its the same logic.
The
argument is that the Holy Trinity is technically another God since it does not have the same attributes
as the
Old Testament God.
With the
older orthodoxy it is possible to disagree,
as in having an
argument.
As for the ones I don't respect (as in the ones who can only call names like a 5 year old but never have a substantive argument), I'd rather that they didn't
As for the ones I don't respect (
as in the ones who can only call names like a 5 year old but never have a substantive argument), I'd rather that they didn't
as in the ones who can only call names like a 5 year
old but never have a substantive
argument), I'd rather that they didn't..
As the
old axiom has it, abusus non tollit usum: abuse is no
argument against proper use.
Some anti-circumcision groups, however, say the lawsuit's
argument for religious liberty is just an excuse to defend
old tradition that some frown upon
as strange compared with mainstream hospital circumcisions.
He condemns ho - mos - exuality even though it is a natural practice (feel free to disagree all you want, but that
argument will go nowhere), and his idea of a good marriage is a 13 year
old girl being given to a 40 year
old man
as payment for a land deal, with her bloody sheets being used
as a receipt of a good deal, and if she isn't a vir - gin (she could have been ra - ped, or her hy - men could have burst while riding a horse or something) she is to be stoned to death on her parent's doorstep.
However, the
argument is still far from clear - cut
as, of course, these 14 - day -
old human cells have much greater potential than any worm or parasite.
REASON AND SIENCE More than 2000 years
old argument and belief of hindu Pharisee's, criminal self centered, hindu Jew's, criminal secular's, deniers of truth absolute, base of hinduism, corruption of truth absolute called religion's, such
as Judaism, hindu Mithra ism, savior ism, labeled
as Christianity, Suni ism, Shea ism.
He is a person whose
arguments, also in these pages, hold out hope that
old - fashioned liberalism, understood
as intelligence and decency, is not entirely dead.
Despite Hartshorne's difference from the
older rationalism, this
argument has fascinated him
as well.
Although there is an
argument to suggest that the Dutchman's versatility and quality on the ball could make him an important squad member, it doesn't appear
as though it will be enough to save his
Old Trafford career.
The spoilt brats
argument has become
old and tired... Life is nasty brutish and short just want our team to be winners once in a while... and no I don't count fa cup
as sufficient and certainly not carling
I've backed the 68 year -
old on a number of occasions,
as well
as voicing some concerns at times, but
as we look destined to miss out on Champions League football for the second season running, I'm not sure there can be any
argument against giving the reins over to somebody else.
Tebow, a 30 - year -
old player who has a defensive ceiling
as a bad corner outfielder, hit.226 /.309 /.347 against teenagers and 21 - year -
olds, which would suggest that there are, oh, about 100 to 200 players with a better
argument for an invitation.
(Begin
old man rant)
As for the
argument that the best players in the world won't be at the Olympics, eh.
i agree andy but its not just the 4 years of hard work that should be taken into account, firstly the fai hav missed out on millions at a time where money is already tight, and more importantly the fact that given, kilbane, o shea, dunne, duff, whelan and keane may be too
old when the next one comes around and for a professional footballer to hav a chance to represent his country on the biggest stage of all taken away in this manner is cruel, there can be no
argument against technology when there is so much at stake
as for henry being labelled a cheat i do not agree
as it came at him so quick and although he in fact handled it twice i do not believe it was pre-meditated like maradonnas effort or that disgusting dive by anelka at 0 - 1... can any1 who watched the game live please tell me how lass diarra stayed on the pitch let alone avoided a yellow??
My study needs a good
old DO NOT ENTER SIGN
as whenever I sit down to work, four children suddenly desperately need a drink, food or have an
argument.
I'm absolutely on the side of Motherlode columnist Lisa Belkin who shoots down this
argument as not only «backwards» but also upholding the idea that these «archaically - structured» workplace models are somehow inherently correct — simply because they're
old.
Instead, it supports my
argument to do it young, when settling involves constructing a family environment with a perfectly acceptable man who may not trip your romantic trigger —
as opposed to doing it
older, when settling involves selling your very soul in exchange for damaged goods.
The same
old arguments are being used and adoption is being touted
as a way for these young women to «get on with their lives.»
According to her the videos and pictures that people are using
as their justification does not make sense because she was so skinny and small than size 6, so people can not base their
argument on her
old pictures
as their justification.
Moyo was thus uncriticically regurgitating the
old Malthusian
argument about «tragedies of the commons» occurring, mostly in developing countries, with population growth and environmental factors
as the cause of growing poverty and civil strife.
The economy may have played stronger
as an
argument in the
old Conservative heartlands, and some of the LibDem ones, where the recovery is more apparent and deprivation less so.
As to the latter, to take an extreme case, if a new type of government comes to power, and in the course of it two drunks in a bar have an
argument about whether the new government is better than the
old and they throw a couple of punches, and that is the only violence, would you say that that means it failed the «no violence» test?
For prosecutors, retrying a case — recompiling witnesses and exhibits, reviewing
old jury
arguments — often does not have the same spark
as the first time.
The panic in the Brexit ranks was best represented by a leader in the Spectator, which dredged up all the
old Leave
arguments as if they still held currency now they had been so visibly disproven.