Goals like these are especially notable to the extent that they would supplant even natural gas, which is abundant, cheap, flexible and widely used to replace
old coal plants as they become uneconomic and shut down.
In Illinois, our Governor (who is otherwise awful) got an agreement to shut down several
old coal plants as part of an overall air quality arrangement.
Not exact matches
As well, the NIF has postulated that bringing the plants online in the 2030s will have a major impact on reducing carbon emissions as older, coal - producing power plants are then retire
As well, the NIF has postulated that bringing the
plants online in the 2030s will have a major impact on reducing carbon emissions
as older, coal - producing power plants are then retire
as older,
coal - producing power
plants are then retired.
One came for free, the result of a years -
old consent agreement with National Grid
as a result of problems with
coal - burning power
plants in Western N.Y; the other was the result of a $ 4.5 million purchase from a national land trust group.
Sequestration,
as envisioned in the report, involves capturing the CO2 from
coal - fired power
plants, compressing it into a liquid and injecting it deep beneath the earth into
old oil fields or saline aquifers.
Currently, nuclear and wind energy (
as well
as clean
coal) are between 25 and 75 percent more expensive than
old - fashioned
coal at current prices (not including all the hidden health and environmental costs of
coal), and so it will take a stiff charge on
coal to induce rapid replacement of obsolete
plants.
The shortfall may grow critical
as electricity producers close down
old oil and
coal plants in favor of cleaner natural gas.
The panel argues that the current rules
as written let supercritical
coal plant developers claim avoided emissions by comparing their projects to power
plant technology that's now a decade
old.
Does it makes sense to replace
old coal - fired power
plants with new natural gas power
plants today,
as a bridge to a longer - term transition toward near zero - emission energy generation technologies such
as solar, wind, or nuclear power?
The KDHE has denied a permit for a
coal plant that would have been more efficient (read, more MWH per ton of
coal and less CO2 and other pollutants per MWH) than
older plants whose permits they will be renewing
as a matter of course over the coming months and years.
Apropos of that, the Cato Institute magazine, Regulation this month had a really neat article in it about the fallacy of «grandfathering,»
as implemented for
old coal plants in the Clean Air Act.
Fully contracted renewable energy projects have the least transition risk while
older, inefficient merchant
coal plants are likely to suffer disproportionately from the financial effects of carbon transition such
as lower wholesale prices, the cost of carbon credits, lower capacity factors and increased operating or capital costs, according to the report.
Wood burning is subsidized
as renewable energy and also favored for use in dirty
older coal plants that must meet new regulations on sulphur dioxide emissions.
There is no doubt that the global
coal fleet is changing
as older inefficient subcritical stations built decades ago in Europe and the US are being replaced by new, highly efficient
plants in emerging economies like China, South and South - east Asia.
New gas - fired
plants are starting up almost
as fast
as older coal plants are shutting down.
Western Balkan countries, including Bosnia, Kosovo, Montenegro and Serbia, plan to invest billions of euros in building new
coal - fired
plants to meet rising demand for electricity
as old plants are being phased out.
Utilities nationwide have set retirements for 266
coal power
plants since 2010
as residents reject paying the personal health costs and the expensive electricity rates needed to keep
old coal plants running.
Though there may be a case for supporting a temporary role for
older coal plants to be used
as emergency reserve capacity in some countries, it says, running for just a few hours a year to ensure security of supply.
This is unfortunate,
as neither institution makes the distinction between financing
old - school
coal power
plants and CCS projects.
As the owners of
older coal plants consider whether to retire them or upgrade them to meet new and emerging environmental standards, the threat of greenhouse gas regulation will be an overlay of uncertainty and possible large expense, on top of the burdens imposed by other new and proposed environmental regulations and the competition from natural gas.
Residential customers experiencing the highest increases, and / or potential increases, are those who are heavily dependent on
coal - fueled generation,
as required retrofits can not economically meet existing environmental requirements — resulting in the proposed retirement of
older coal - fueled
plants.
BNEF expects the nation's
coal - power capacity in 2040 will be about half of what it is now after
older plants come offline and are replaced by cheaper and less - polluting sources such
as gas and renewables.
The reason: Since 2012, carbon pollution from the states» traditionally
coal - heavy power sectors has dropped significantly,
as new gas power
plants have replaced
older, less efficient
coal plants.
The industry is hoping much of its growth will come from filling the gap
as governments force
old coal power
plants to close to meet climate change goals,
as the UK has committed to doing by 2025.
Scores of
old, inefficient
coal - fired power
plants were already expected to close
as a result of other air pollution regulations — with gas fired
plants popping up in their place.
All donations will go toward marketing a message of Truth and Organic Health around the world - until we ReLegalize Industrial Hemp and allow our best scientists to develop the technology we have, recover
old technologies we've lost, and research NEW technology for using organic
plants (rather than OIL,
coal & trees)
as a RENEWABLE natural resource.
Coal's greatest asset as a fuel is the number of older, paid - off coal pla
Coal's greatest asset
as a fuel is the number of
older, paid - off
coal pla
coal plants.
On the other hand, it is reasonable to assume that natural market factors will gradually result in a reduction of ever more expensive fossil fuel combustion
as older coal - fired power
plants are shut down and replaced by nuclear
plants,
as hybrid and electrical cars gradually replace gasoline and diesel driven ones, and
as energy efficiency is improved and waste reduced.
According to the 2010 report, «Impact of EPA Rules on Power Markets,» by Credit Suisse, tougher federal air pollution rules that will be coming in the next few years could prompt electricity companies to close
as many
as 1 in every 5
coal - burning power
plants in America, primarily facilities more than 40 years
old that lack emissions controls.
The Government is keen to see new gas
plants built
as a cleaner replacement for
old coal plants, which it wants to shut by 2025.
Think of this energy storage tank of potential solar power
as akin to the pile of
coal outside an
old coal plant, or to the underground cavern full of natural gas waiting to be burned up above ground in the nearby power
plant.
The average U.S.
coal plant is 42 years
old, according to the EPA, meaning that most of them aren't nearly
as efficient
as new ones, although many have been updated.
As Grist readers know, a wave of new and upcoming EPA regulations puts financial pressure on
old coal plants anyway.
As a separate matter, however,
coal - fired power
plants in the United States are
older, on average, than competing forms of electricity generation.
As we see
older, inefficient
coal plants replaced in Europe and the US by new, highly efficient ones in emerging economies like China, Southeast Asia and India, this issue looks at an array of energy trends and what they mean for these economies.
Unless something happens soon to tilt the balance toward more environmentally benign alternatives, nearly all of those power
plants will use the
old - fashioned, intrinsically dirty technology known
as pulverized
coal.
Older coal plants will continue to be hamstrung by the cost of complying with non-climate pollution rules (such
as the ozone air quality standards), plus the perhaps even lower price of natural gas.
We applaud TVA for retiring the 55 year -
old Allen facility instead of investing millions of dollars to continue operating it
as a dirty
coal plant.
«USEDA» (formerly know
as the US Environmental Protection Agency) is proposing revisions to decades -
old air quality regulations that will make it easier for
coal - fired generation
plants to obtain construction and operating permits for sites where air
The scheme was one of two emergency schemes first introduced last year to help cope with Britain's tightening power margins,
as old coal plants are closed down and not replaced.
Unless Germany brought an additional 40 billion kWh of generation from its
older, more carbon - intensive
coal - fired power
plants offline, this planned uptick in fossil fuel generation would cause the country's overall carbon emissions to rise by
as much
as 14 % of the country's 2008 total carbon emissions (33 million tons of CO2), illustrated in Figure 1 below.