West Virginia's school - finance system goes on trial this month when a judge revisits a landmark 13 - year -
old court mandate for injecting equity and quality into the state's schools.
Not exact matches
Ruling in a 25 - year -
old school - desegregation case, the judge rejected the state's argument that the district could pay for the
court mandates through cost - saving measures, including cutting...
In 1998, in New Jersey's school funding case, called «Abbott,» the state's highest
court ruled that preschool is an essential component of a constitutionally adequate education and
mandated universal full - day preschool for 3 - and 4 - year -
olds in the 31 highest poverty districts in the state.
The Florida public - school establishment is suing to repeal the Sunshine State's 13 - year -
old school - choice tax credit and its new education savings accounts under the state's Blaine Amendment and its «uniformity clause,» which
mandates that «Adequate provision shall be made by law for a uniform, efficient, safe, secure, and high quality system of free public schools...» The Florida Supreme
Court previously struck down the state's voucher program under this provision in Bush v. Holmes (2006), on the grounds that the vouchers «divert [ed] public dollars» from «the sole means set out in the Constitution for the state to provide for the education of Florida's children.»
According to the
Court, this is supported by an interpretation of the exceptions in light of Article 5 (5), which
mandates that exceptions must only be applied in certain special cases which do not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work or other subject matter and which do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the right
older.
«We're under a
mandate from
court administration, Supreme Court, to get the older cases
court administration, Supreme
Court, to get the older cases
Court, to get the
older cases out.
But judges and lawyers can apparently work into
old age (the Supreme
Court of Canada
mandates retirement at 75 and the Supreme
Court of United States has no mandatory retirement).
There are many examples of these:
court -
mandated father - child only activities, dinners out, and therapies; parent - teacher conferences and school events also attended by the ex; pick - ups and drop - offs that can take considerable time away from the intact family, derail spontaneity in outings, and may also include impromptu visiting with the former spouse; continuing communications with the former spouse; activities during timesharing with the
older stepchild that are not suitable for including later children or the stepmother; timesharing and school holiday schedules that conflict with the stepmother's children's time off or interfere with holiday plans, etc..