Not exact matches
One opinion out there says that content of a certain age doesn't matter, that Google (and Panda) knows that
older content is often ignored by readers and is more or less
irrelevant.
Although no
one can say with all certainty that age is
irrelevant in a market's longevity, there are signs that the current eight - year -
old run has further room to grow, at least in the short term.
While Matt Cutts said in this video that «the difference between a six - month -
old domain and a
one - year -
old domain name is not huge at all,» that doesn't mean it's
irrelevant.
What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women teaching in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit
one to another»; why the laws of the
Old Testament are treated as
irrelevant in
one moment, but important enough to display in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.
Logic 101 — it wouldn't matter
one bit if 99.99 % of 80 and 90 year
olds were omni, that's
irrelevant, if you can observe that out of say 100,000 who eat a «low protein» diet you do not have «100 % [early] mortality» or anywhere NEAR that, then it's obvious how crazy the claim was....
Decade by decade, project by project, Bay Area artists have proved that this tired
old debate is an
irrelevant one.
Old arguments about baseload power supply could
one day simply become
irrelevant.
Playing uncivil, tactical, inappropriate,
old - school, trial by ambush games like: threatening to require proof of obviously valid records, holding back important documents until the last second, failing to fulfil undertakings until the eve of trial, delivering new expert's reports during the trial, saying untrue things to counsel opposite (whether knowingly or not), failing to prepare examinations in advance to «wing it» at trial, refusing to agree to the admissibility of relevant documents while requiring changes to be made to
irrelevant ones, refusing to share costs of joint expenses, refusing to cooperate on court ordered process matters, are all wrongful.
And if the answer is «no
one» because the information is really
old or
irrelevant, cut it out.
One of the classic problems with many resumes is «
old news» or information which is largely
irrelevant.