Sentences with phrase «older books when»

I loved my Sony e-reader, but when it became frustrating to load books to it and sometimes I'd lose all my old books when putting one new book on, I said «Screw it!»

Not exact matches

«When I was 14 years old, right after my first book [the 1978 classic This Can't Be Happening at Macdonald Hall!]

And while some older people may discount Mulcahy's strategy of using a chat box on her website as impersonal, she sees it as a way to communicate with customers on their time table — maybe at 11 p.m. when they happen to need a tutor or want to book an appointment.

When President Trump has his physical exam on Friday, there is little chance he will repeat the same story within a span of 10 minutes or fail to recognize old friends, as the explosive new book «Fire and Fury» by Michael Wolff asserts he has done in the past.

My uncle told me to read this book when I was 17 years old because it changed his life.

This classic career book may advertise that it's practical, but I used in it when I was 21 years old to help me find my purpose at the time.

Selling copies of your book, no matter how old it is, how or when it was published - or preparing the groundwork for your phenomenal success in the future - begins with the decision to do so.

When the 54 - year - old world leader manages to steal a few fleeting moments to unwind past dark, he reportedly reads good, old paper books, and not always about politics and domestic and foreign affairs.

If you're old enough to remember a time before mobile devices existed, you may wistfully yearn for the days when people were head - up, paid better attention to conversations and read books or the newspaper instead of scrolling through a Facebook feed on their phones.

Although written when Tony Robbins was only 25 years old, Unlimited Power remains as one of the most popular and overall best self - help books available.

When asked if their old firms» male culture led them to go off on their own, Fonstad stated that it has been challenging at times and mentioned that she's experienced some of the «penalties women take for being aggressive and tough» that were highlighted in Sheryl Sandberg's book, Lean In.

They could have found someone with more credentials, but when your oppoent is some whacko who just believes everything in ancient book... I think a 5 year old could win that debate

It may be silly, but then getting paid minimum wage to read books when one is 18 years old ain't a bad gig, and this man and the library he led and the town which made this library possible are irreplaceable factors in both making and preserving important things like the opportunity to read good (or not so good) books in quiet solitude.

However, I'm genuinely interested to know how that spirit of enquiry manifests itself in the religious when all that seems to matter is the contents of a millenia - old book.

But, in the books, when the oldest vampires were exposed to sun, their skin only darkened some.

When he was 12 years old, I think he was writing his first book about the Spanish American War while I was watching Brady Bunch reruns and snacking on Cheetos.

Claiming that the book of mormon is a new bible is like saying that christians created they're own bible when they added the new testament to the old testament.

i can referrence any «bible» when talking about any holy book and still use it properly but not change the topic of discussion... this is the times when i wish i was still in talking terms with my old professor, such mistakes would not have happened and a grand conversation may have ensued... whatever... as i said

«It is sad that a man would look to a thousand year old book to tell him right from wrong, when the real answers are written in the man's own heart.»

When I wrote my first book, I was on maternity leave with a 4 - year - old, a 2 year - old, and a newborn.

I'm feeling like a hoax when Dianah slightly moves her crutch that lays between her and mother and murmurs it like a prayer, the living and active words of the Old Book that keep her living, and the words sound the opposite of trite when she speaks them under the beat of the African sun:

A few years ago when the number of languages into which it had been rendered was approaching the one thousand mark, it was decided to publish a volume in celebration of that event, to be called The Book of a Thousand Tongues, based doubtless upon the old hymn, «O, for a thousand tongues to sing my great Redeemer's praise.»

In current discussions of the nature and purpose of theological education Edward Farley has invoked the older of these two models of excellence in schooling when he describes his book Theologia as an essay «which purports to promote a Christian paideia.»

Even when the petitions of the Old Testament concerning public matters are not vindictive, they are commonly nationalistic, as, for example, the Isaian plea for divine interposition in Israel's desperate need, (Isaiah 63:15 - 64:12) or Daniel's great prayer for his people, (Daniel 9:4 - 19) or the ejaculatory supplications of Ezekiel, (Ezekiel 9:8; 11:13) or the elaborate petitions in the Books of Ezra and Nehemiah.

They show that the Old Testament can, and must, be read as a Christian book, prophetic of Jesus; that the paradox that the Messiah should suffer death can be understood in the light of the scriptures; and that the risen Lord's presence, even if it is not recognized at other times, is to be discerned when he encounters his people in the breaking of bread (the Church's Eucharist).

When the 5 - year - old asks you to tell her about what love is you can crack open an anatomy book and explain about the biochemical hormonal changes that happen in the brain when you fall in love (faWhen the 5 - year - old asks you to tell her about what love is you can crack open an anatomy book and explain about the biochemical hormonal changes that happen in the brain when you fall in love (fawhen you fall in love (fact).

Mathew, I have no problem with gays, because everyone on this earth is responsible for his, or her own righteousness, Ezekiel 14 vs. 14 - 21, but how are you able to dispel the old test, is beyond me, for the new test, should fulfill the old, when one read a book, they don't begin at the back of it do they?

see... just another religious whacko trying to influence others with a 2000 year old book, when the laws of this country are clear.

Perhaps our oldest references to how gifts are not just about relationships, but also carry a sublimated logic of exchange comes in Book VI of the Iliad, when Homer tells us about a gift exchange between two hereditary hospitality friends:

When New Testament writers refer to «the Scriptures», they always (with two exceptions, in late - written books) mean what we call the Old Testament (with or without the Apocrypha).

Kenneth Grahame was an old man when Shepard was commissioned to illustrate his book» indeed he did not live to see the finished product.

You are very weak - minded to really take at face value a 2000 year old book filled with 3000 year old stories, when there isn't one iota of proof that ANY «god» at all was behind those writings.

It is significant that from the second century to the nineteenth, when modern historical scholarship became current, theories about the Bible were held which no competent historian now accepts, such as that Moses wrote the entire Pentateuch (the first five books of the Old Testament) including the description of his own death.

When you read the book of Revelation you'll find this practice of God's is not limited to the Old Testament.

Often in such instances it is difficult for the woman who is content with the old way to «keep up» with a husband who begins asking her to go places with him, to read books and discuss ideas, and to make new kinds of friends, when her satisfaction and security are chiefly in home and family.

When the 36 - year - old pastor and Radical book author became president of the Southern Baptist Convention's International Mission Board (IMB) in 2014, the agency had about 5,000 missionaries.

When people are taunting men of science with decades of research behind them, quoting a 6,000 year old book as «proof» of why big bang cosmology, immunology, evolutionary biology, particle physics and a myriad of technologies are «wrong»?

My book was called When God Pled Guilty, and I was basically arguing that just as Jesus took the sins of the world upon Himself on the cross, so also, somehow, the violent portrayals of God in the Old Testament is God taking the sins of Israel upon Himself through the testimony of inspired Scripture.

I follow / worship Jesus but admire the book Ayn Rand wrote and it had a profound effect on me when I was like 20 years old.

I am assuming you are an adult and most adults don't believe in magic, so why would you think that actually happened when there is no evidence that it happened other than a book that is equally old, has been revised many times and is filled with fiction.

In that moment, I remembered a passage from an old favourite book of mine, Anne's House of Dreams, when the heroine receives a ring with a pearl instead of the traditional diamond for her engagement.

The book told the story of how Anthony was taken to China when he was four years old to be schooled in Kung Fu techniques, subsequently winning world championships and later becoming a bodyguard in Cyprus where he was convicted of theft and converted to Christianity in prison.

You probably have a list of scriptures (the same ones I once used) for this purpose, but if you look at them honestly they do not mention the Bible, but rather «the law», writings of «men of old», «the Word of God», «this book», «this prophecy», «the scripture» or other specified or unspecified writing (s)-- NOT ONE says «the Bible» or can be reasonably interpreted to refer to the Protestant or Catholic canon WE moderns mean when we talk about «the Bible».

That's is until you move to the Book of Mormon, when things get really wacko — it's always fun to base new fable on old fable.

It is not strange that, when Jesus came upon the scene, the Sadducees, the ultraconservatives of their day, who accepted only the earlier books of the Old Testament and refused credence to the new ideas of the later literature, held «that there is no resurrection.»

But when I got older I found that people still believe in this crazy bible book, its been years, and I'm still saddened by the backward following of religion.

My father bought me The Hobbit when I was thirteen years old and the other books shortly after.

The problem, however, is that when we get to Jesus in the Gospels (and especially in the Book of Revelation), we tend to import what we think we know about God from the Old Testament into what the New Testament tells us about Jesus.

When he was seventeen years old Louis joined the Jesuit order, (In his boyish note - book he praises the monastic life for its freedom from sin, and for the imperishable treasures, which it enables us to store up, «of merit in God's eyes which makes of Him our debtor for all Eternity.»

I love it when wingnuts quote a 2000 year old book with countless updates over that time and try to pass it off as fact.