Sentences with phrase «older evidence in»

Buchanan's bill also would allow such older evidence in certain cases.

Not exact matches

Indeed, when confronted with the news that Apple had eclipsed Microsoft in market cap, CEO Steve Ballmer trumpeted the company's dominance in the PC market as evidence of its stability — which, says Bonner, «illustrates the old way of thinking.»

In this real life deus ex machina, the unexpected, if not entirely unforeseeable evidence that led directly to the arrest of the 72 - year - old Vietnam veteran came by way of a relative's DNA submitted to a genealogy website.

«Happy Birthday,» which reportedly generates $ 2 million per year for the Warner / Chappell Music, was interjected into public domain in the 20s, according to new evidence filed in a two - year - old suit.

Prejudice against Jews is at least as old as 1654 in North America and its negative evidences may be found in the histories of most of the clubs and colleges and residential districts of the country.

Police have arrested a 23 - year - old man in connection with the attack and ISIS has claimed responsibility but produced no evidence.

Before this weekend, the evidence that 64 - year - old Xi might stay in power longer than the norm included the newest additions to his string of titles and descriptions, such as «leadership core» in 2016.

Benjamin Netanyahu's stage performance about Iran seeking a nuclear weapon not only was based on old material, but evidence shows it was fabricated too, says Gareth Porter in this Consortium News exclusive report.

Silicon Valley's obsession with cryptocurrencies requires no more evidence than the incredible rise of bitcoin, the alternative currency that crossed $ 10,000 in value on Tuesday in what is a watershed moment for the nine - year - old cash substitute.

Few biologists, few geologists, few physicists and astronomers are creationists, they see the evidence for evolution and an old — indeed, ancient — Earth in what they work with every day.

And when it does, I'll laugh in your face for being one of the last vestiges to stand up for an old myth which hasn't a shred of evidence to support its veracity.

All part and parcel of the evolution of understanding which is also evidenced in both old and new testaments I reckon.

Not only are there reasons not to trust in an old earth, there's plenty of evidence in support of a young earth.

San Angelo, Texas (CNN)- Texas prosecutors rested their case Wednesday in the sexual assault trial of polygamous sect leader Warren Jeffs after playing a key piece of evidence for jurors: an audiotape they allege documents his sexual assault of a 12 - year - old girl.

Depending on how old you are, in 20 - 50 years you'll have more empirical evidence than you can possibly handle.

I have read statements from his peers in the past saying that there is inconclusive evidence in regards to age old mysteries, and I respect him for standing firm with what he believes, but I would expect someone with such a scientific background to have more than conjecture to back their claims.

the law refers mostly to the torah (the first five books of the old testament), which serve no purpose in purifying christians, as evidenced by the fact that we christians no longer sacrifice rams.

I think some in this group, MUST explain away the evidence that points to the Earth being very, very old, in order to speak with authority on evolution.

But for the young man just beginning his ministry and for the older minister who has just not had many opportunities in this area, it is important to cite evidence that many ministers are active and relatively successful in helping alcoholics.

Having examined evidence such as Big Bang cosmology (yup, I'm what you'd call an «old earth» creationist), the Cambrian explosion in the fossil record, the problems of abiogenesis, and textual criticism of the Bible, I've found that the Bible describes historical events and other aspects of reality much more plausibly than any other faith system.

Even if we were certain of the original meaning of the root underlying the Hebrew noun we could hardly take this as conclusive evidence of the basic understanding of the Old Testament prophet in the middle centuries of the first millenium B.C. Rather, we will have to understand the sense of the term nabi» from the person of the prophet himself as he appears and functions in the community of ancient Israel.

Chesterton's Autobiography is not always a reliable source; but there is corroborating evidence for these protective feelings from his childhood onwards: and since this evidence is virtually unknown, it is probably best here to take this opportunity to publish it for the first time (much of it will appear in my forthcoming book Chesterton and the Romance of Orthodoxy, though I discovered some of it too late for it to be included) rather than repeat old arguments.

Some evidence: «The oldest rocks on Earth, found in western Greenland, have been dated by four independent radiometric dating methods at 3.7 - 3.8 billion years.»

Yeah but they want to teach the controversy... you know, how the earth might be only 10,000 years old (no it isn't) and that humans and dinosaurs roamed the earth together (no they didn't) and that evolution has no evidence (yes it does) or that there was a global flood (no there wasn't) or that the earth might be flat or the center of the universe or a million other wrong headed theories that fly in the face of the evidence.

How sad that you deny real evidence for a 2000 year old book that has never been updated and can be proven to be false on numerous things... a book written by primitive man to fool the gullible out of money and make them live in fear.

Neville i agree with you Jesus has the power to forgive sin past present and future through the cross when he died his death covered past present and future.If those in the old testament were justified by faith and made righteous then they are covered by the blood of Jesus even though he hadn't died for them yet because there hope was in God.Isn't that what the definition of faith is it is the substance of things hoped for the evidence of things unseen.The proof is Enoch how could he go to be with God if he was not righteous and only the blood of Jesus is able to do that.

And no, a narrative in a 1500 - year old collection of short stories is not considered scientific evidence or proof of anything, no matter how many people believe it.

You can't tell people how to live their lives, what to do with their body, and who they can marry, just because of what you read in a 2000 year old book that is unsupported by evidence.

Theocracy is based on studies of an old book or two written by philosophers and politicians in addition to stories handed down over generations with no real physical evidence to analyze.

Because last I checked there was still not a single shred of tangible, measurable, empirical evidence in support of any form of Theism, let alone something as backwards, corrupt, and atrocious, morally reprehensible (historically), and specific as Catholicism, which isn't even a very accurate form of Christianity when compared to the oldest Biblical scripts we've yet found.

Evidence of other researchers shows an almost exact equivalence of experimental results in the use of transitive inference by squirrel monkeys and four year old children.

Atheists can prove that science exists, that the earth is more than 6000 years old, that their is NO WAY to build the size ark that Noah built and do what is claimed in the bible, again when making extraordinary claims, we need evidence and we know that snakes do not talk, that the laws of physics can not be suspended and that nearly EVERY claim in the bible is false.

Extraordinary claims in a 2,000 year old book does not equal evidence.

Now, I am sure he thinks I am misled in my beliefs, but the claims of Christ, and the evidence for the resurrection have stood the test of timeas well the most rigorous of secular investigation... I notice not much was mentioned of Jesus and HIs claims, just the Old testament... interesting...

It may be that the omission is due to circumstances which rob it of significance, yet the fact that the older sources in Samuel manifest the same oversight and that one goes on as far as the prophetic histories and then to the writing prophets for indubitable evidence of belief in a common ancestry strengthens the suspicion that things were not what later writers would have us believe.

Citing a biblical scholar, he says: «In the light of the conclusions drawn earlier that there is no explicit Old Testament justification for assuming that wine drinking is ever appropriate for the saint, even in moderation, it is important to indicate briefly that the New Testament evidence concurs with, or at least is not contrary to, this conclusion» (p. 137In the light of the conclusions drawn earlier that there is no explicit Old Testament justification for assuming that wine drinking is ever appropriate for the saint, even in moderation, it is important to indicate briefly that the New Testament evidence concurs with, or at least is not contrary to, this conclusion» (p. 137in moderation, it is important to indicate briefly that the New Testament evidence concurs with, or at least is not contrary to, this conclusion» (p. 137).

Carbon - 14 found in fossils at all layers of the geological spectrum, is evidence, which confirms, the Biblical account of the earth being thousands, Not, billions of years old!

Nearly all of the Old Testament is written in the light of this tradition, but our only evidence for this migration is now embedded in traditions which were not committed to writing until some three hundred years later.

it is clear they really sort of favor the gods, but just can't quite see enough evidence to believe in the old boy!

There is ample evidence in the Old Testament of the prophetic resistance to the resurgence of the Baal cult, which, with its accompanying religious prostitution, provided the ritual for celebrating and promoting the new vitality and growth at the appropriate time of the year.

Once more exploring the evidence of the old sources in the Book of Judges, to our astonishment we find neither of these supposedly basic notions of Israel's common life.

While there are substantial indications that some people do have a biochemical disorder that manifests itself in mental abnormalities, the record offers persuasive evidence that much mental illness stems from the old - fashioned toxins of sin and guilt.

It seems that personality one, The Father, was present in the Old Testament without evidence of the existence of personalities two, the Son, and three, The Spirit.

I am assuming you are an adult and most adults don't believe in magic, so why would you think that actually happened when there is no evidence that it happened other than a book that is equally old, has been revised many times and is filled with fiction.

Maybe if people learned to reside in the 21st century and by the evidence that we have now opposed to information from a 2000 year old book, this world would be a better place.

Now, if you had actual evidence, that would be another story, but your child like belief in an old book, I suppose, is all you need.

That and hiding fossils that, for all the world, test as millions of years old, as well as a mountain of other evidence, if he's responsible for faking all of it then he is seriously twisted and not at all interested in «the truth.»

There is no reliable evidence of modern humans elsewhere in the Old World until 60,000 - 40,000 years ago, during a short temperate period in the midst of the last ice age.

In reality however, the development of archaeology as a discipline has produced a wealth of material evidence for the essential reliability of the Old Testament.

(Jeremiah 15:15) Moreover, the saving efficacy of good lives in a community had been an implicit corollary of the old sense of social solidarity, as is picturesquely evidenced in Yahweh's consent to Abraham's argument that if there were even ten good men in Sodom it should not be destroyed.