But
older generations of scientists were often reliable guardians of reason.
I think I would date it from about the time of the first IPCC assessment which of course is when
the older generation of scientists such as Hubert Lamb started to wthdraw from the field.
Not exact matches
Older scientists contribute to the propagation
of scientific fields in ways that go beyond educating and mentoring a new
generation.
I think most
of the Americans are in lost... as most
of them do not know who their father is and it is very unfortunate... even if they know who their father is, the mom has children from diff men outside
of marriage... and while a child is being raised, watching what his / her parents do to enjoy their life... so things become normal when they grow up... like if you go back early nineteen century, women were not allowed to go to beach without being covered... and now it totally opposite... if you do not have a boyfriend or girlfriend before 15, the parents worries that their teenage has some problem... and lot more can be listed... And then you go to Church, what our children learn from there... they see in front
of the Church an
old man's statue with long beard standing with extending
of both hand... some
of the status are blank, white, Spanish and so on... so they are being taught God as an
old dude... then you learn from Catholic that you pray to Jesus, Mother Marry, Saints, Death spirit and all these... the poll shows a huge number
of young American turns to Atheism or believing there is no God and so on... Its hard to assume where these nations are going with the name
of modernization... nothing wrong having
scientists discovered the cure
of aids or the pics from mars but... we should all think and learn from our previous
generations and correct ourselves... also ppl are becoming so much slave
of material things...
In an important article in Commonweal (September 27, 1996), University
of Notre Dame political
scientist David Leege pointed out that
older Catholics are mostly Democratic, while their younger coreligionists are more likely to turn to the GOP» a
generation gap, if you will.
The opportunities for the next
generation of physician -
scientists are huge, as medicine and science come together and generate fresh interdisciplinary approaches to scientific and clinical problems
old and new.
«The younger
generations of scientists are immersed in a technology and culture
of sharing to which the «
old guard» is oblivious.
Still, the burst puts
scientists closer to the first
generation than ever before: It is about 150 million years
older than any other known astrophysical object, says astronomer Nial Tanvir
of the University
of Leicester in England, the lead author
of one
of the new Nature papers.
Then, take a trip down memory lane as we spotlight five
old - school science kits that have inspired
generations of scientists.
What we didn't realize is that our work could be so profoundly inspiring to a young
generation of scientists — one eleven - year -
old passenger pigeon enthusiast and de-extinctionist to be exact, who was so excited by the idea
of de-extinction that he published a novel in 2015 on the subject.
Perceptions
of scientific consensus also tend to vary by age with younger
generations (ages 18 to 49) more likely than
older ones to see
scientists as in agreement on these topics.
Read on in
Generation Rx for: — exclusive interviews with the strategists,
scientists, and current and former heads
of GlaxoSmithKline, Eli Lilly, Merck, Roche, and more — a first - ever, inside look at the rollicking business story behind pharma's rise to power — the dramatic effects our drug culture is having on our major organs, from the liver to the heart to the brain — why
old bodies and young bodies are the biggest, and riskiest, arenas for our great American prescription pill party — how the largely uncharted terrain
of polypharmacy (various drugs taken together) has unleashed unanticipated, often deadly, consequences on unwitting patients
Generation Rx will make every American who has ever taken a prescription drug look anew at what's in our medicine cabinets, and why.
Perceptions
of scientific consensus also tend to vary by age with younger
generations (ages 18 to 49) more likely than
older ones to see
scientists as in agreement on these topics.
Anu once again tries the appeal to authority game, obviously not understanding that most
of the
older generation scientists in climate do not have a climate science degree because it simply did not exist.
We have for
generations heard from freaks who advocate studying science with little discernible effect in attracting new students in either secondary or tertiary studies; one
of the reasons for this is that we have been inundated by facile boosters rather than hearing from
older, mature
scientists who can present a philosophically considered point
of view on the value and the limitations
of science.
Personally, I don't think the opinions
of an 83 - year
old retired sedimentologist and oil company consultant who has spent years dismissing climate change and climate
scientists should influence the future
of younger
generations, who are, after all, the ones who would have to live with the consequences
of his deeply mistaken advice.