Sentences with phrase «oldest evidence for»

Researchers have found the oldest evidence for dog breeding on a remote island in the East Siberian Sea.

Fossil stromatolites are the oldest evidence for life on Earth — they first appeared 3.7 billion years ago!»

This culture, named for the beautiful carved standing stones («deer stones») and burial mounds (khirigsuurs) it built across the Mongolian Steppe, is linked with some of the oldest evidence for nomadic herding and domestic livestock use in eastern Eurasia.

The South African archaeological record is so important because it shows some of the oldest evidence for modern behavior in early humans.

Finally, we must look at the oldest evidence for the resurrection, I Corinthians 15:3 ff.

Not exact matches

Evidence is building for the validity of many of the assumptions that went into our old forecast, while other assumptions have been revised.

While Islamic State has claimed responsibility for the Nice attack, no firm evidence has yet emerged that the 31 - year - old attacker, a delivery van driver with a record of home violence and petty crimes, had direct contact with the group.

For the next week people lined up to shed the evidence of Penney's century - old history.

«Happy Birthday,» which reportedly generates $ 2 million per year for the Warner / Chappell Music, was interjected into public domain in the 20s, according to new evidence filed in a two - year - old suit.

A video of a 70 - year - old woman testing out the autopilot system of a Tesla Model S is evidence that the technology is not for everyone just yet.

60 We have not completed recent evidence reviews for artemisinin - combination therapy (ACT) for malaria (older review of the program here), antibiotics to treat pneumonia or oral rehydration salts to treat diarrhea, but we believe that there is relatively strong evidence to support these programs.

Silicon Valley's obsession with cryptocurrencies requires no more evidence than the incredible rise of bitcoin, the alternative currency that crossed $ 10,000 in value on Tuesday in what is a watershed moment for the nine - year - old cash substitute.

No there is a mountain of evidence for evolution: geographic distribution, tree of life, simpler organisms are older, inheritance, DNA, etc. and no evidence for creationism — unless you've seen a woman created from the rib of a man.

you really need to do your research on your boy jesus... that story is very old... and like all relgions, manifested... as for the existence of a god... you provide any evidence (and i mean any) then we can have a discussion... until then, your opinion is invalid... WHAT CAN BE ASSERTED WITHOUT PROOF CAN BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PROOF... HITCHENS

Few biologists, few geologists, few physicists and astronomers are creationists, they see the evidence for evolution and an old — indeed, ancient — Earth in what they work with every day.

There's a lot more mathematical evidence for the scientific origin of the universe than one dusty old book, let's just put it that way.

And by the way, for the intelligent design crowd, how, exactly, do you DARE to disbelieve tbe evidence that was «obviously» «crafted» with such care to make the universe look like it's 13 billion years old?

Jumping up and down, like a 3 year old having a tantrum, screaming... «Evolution is real... Evolution is real»... is not enough evidence for me.

And when it does, I'll laugh in your face for being one of the last vestiges to stand up for an old myth which hasn't a shred of evidence to support its veracity.

For the early church, Jesus» resurrection was tangible evidence that the New Age had invaded the Old Eon.

San Angelo, Texas (CNN)- Texas prosecutors rested their case Wednesday in the sexual assault trial of polygamous sect leader Warren Jeffs after playing a key piece of evidence for jurors: an audiotape they allege documents his sexual assault of a 12 - year - old girl.

I have read statements from his peers in the past saying that there is inconclusive evidence in regards to age old mysteries, and I respect him for standing firm with what he believes, but I would expect someone with such a scientific background to have more than conjecture to back their claims.

But for the young man just beginning his ministry and for the older minister who has just not had many opportunities in this area, it is important to cite evidence that many ministers are active and relatively successful in helping alcoholics.

I find the atrocities endorsed and / or committed by the God of the Old testament sufficient evidence for a reasonable person (like me) to wonder why anyone would willingly worship that God.

As feminists lifted to consciousness the age - old pattern of male domination and destroyed its self - evidence, they could call for a post-patriarchal society.

Chesterton's Autobiography is not always a reliable source; but there is corroborating evidence for these protective feelings from his childhood onwards: and since this evidence is virtually unknown, it is probably best here to take this opportunity to publish it for the first time (much of it will appear in my forthcoming book Chesterton and the Romance of Orthodoxy, though I discovered some of it too late for it to be included) rather than repeat old arguments.

The «evidence» for your god consists of special feelings and a really old book.

How sad that you deny real evidence for a 2000 year old book that has never been updated and can be proven to be false on numerous things... a book written by primitive man to fool the gullible out of money and make them live in fear.

Neville i agree with you Jesus has the power to forgive sin past present and future through the cross when he died his death covered past present and future.If those in the old testament were justified by faith and made righteous then they are covered by the blood of Jesus even though he hadn't died for them yet because there hope was in God.Isn't that what the definition of faith is it is the substance of things hoped for the evidence of things unseen.The proof is Enoch how could he go to be with God if he was not righteous and only the blood of Jesus is able to do that.

Reflection shows that the evidence for old - time sanctity comes from suspect sources such as hagiography, panegyrics and sermons.

When it comes to the evidence for a 4.5 - billion - year - old universe offered by astronomy and physics, they fall silent, because few of the have the mental equipment necessary to deal with that evidence.

But old - line feminism still has a tin ear for listening to women with children, as evidenced by their main solution to the problem of combining work and family life: the socialization of child care.

Now, I am sure he thinks I am misled in my beliefs, but the claims of Christ, and the evidence for the resurrection have stood the test of timeas well the most rigorous of secular investigation... I notice not much was mentioned of Jesus and HIs claims, just the Old testament... interesting...

It may be that the omission is due to circumstances which rob it of significance, yet the fact that the older sources in Samuel manifest the same oversight and that one goes on as far as the prophetic histories and then to the writing prophets for indubitable evidence of belief in a common ancestry strengthens the suspicion that things were not what later writers would have us believe.

Citing a biblical scholar, he says: «In the light of the conclusions drawn earlier that there is no explicit Old Testament justification for assuming that wine drinking is ever appropriate for the saint, even in moderation, it is important to indicate briefly that the New Testament evidence concurs with, or at least is not contrary to, this conclusion» (p. 137).

Nearly all of the Old Testament is written in the light of this tradition, but our only evidence for this migration is now embedded in traditions which were not committed to writing until some three hundred years later.

Even though the Old Testament evidence confirmed my hypothesis, it was difficult for me to hear that language coming from the mouth of Christ.

There is ample evidence in the Old Testament of the prophetic resistance to the resurgence of the Baal cult, which, with its accompanying religious prostitution, provided the ritual for celebrating and promoting the new vitality and growth at the appropriate time of the year.

That and hiding fossils that, for all the world, test as millions of years old, as well as a mountain of other evidence, if he's responsible for faking all of it then he is seriously twisted and not at all interested in «the truth.»

The evidence for an earth that is around 4.5 billion years old is overwhelming.

In reality however, the development of archaeology as a discipline has produced a wealth of material evidence for the essential reliability of the Old Testament.

Although graffiti at Pompeii and the number of the Beast in the Apocalypse show the modern notation for numbers, there is evidence for the survival of the older system known to us from Athenian temple treasury accounts and the Purian marble)(Ibid.)

(39) The basis for that model is rooted in the social history of ancient Israel and is evidenced textually in the Old Testament tension between the transformative vision of Moses, which belonged to the earliest voice of liberated Israel, and the stabilizing tendency of royal theology which sought to build institutions and establish a reliable social structure.

Your problem is that we have actual evidence that the universe is 13.7 billion years old, that the earth is 4.5 billion years old, and that modern humans have been here for over 200,000 years.

Wanting to see the historical evidence for this, Yuval followed along as I pointed to a list of Messianic prophecies given in the Tanach (Old Testament) and their fulfillment in the B'rit Hadashah (New Testament).

But then I'm not holding my breath — fred has had this same argument time and time again, and has yet to come up with any credible evidence for his particular brand of make - believe — something so obviously rehashed from older mythology.

I am going to pull out the old chestnut that, just because a term we use comes from only one verse it doesn't follow that it is wrong or that the evidence for it is weak.

@Fred Oh, so you are adopting the old «God the deceiver» stuff where all the massive evidence for evolution and the fossil record is just a huge illusion that god put there to be a dip.

These evidences remain very important; but, whether we like it or deplore it, the older type of argument for Christianity based upon the documents and traditions and heroism of the age of the Apostolic Fathers has no longer the evidential power of former days.

No evidence is exactly what you would expect to find for an imaginary character from a 2000 year old book.