Sentences with phrase «oldest known example»

A 13,000 - year - old pair of teeth has the oldest known example of tooth filling.

In what may be the oldest known example of one insect parasitizing another, researchers have unearthed a 52 - million - year - old fossil of a beetle that takes advantage of an ant.

The coastal site is the oldest known example of a shark nursery.

And it's in South America that researchers recently found the oldest known example of fabrics dyed with indigo.

This particular example is the oldest known example of oxidative weathering from a terrestrial environment, occurring about 600 million years before the Great Oxidation Event that laid the foundations for the evolution of complex life.»

In addition to being the oldest known example of an early primate skeleton, the new fossil is crucial in elucidating a pivotal event in primate and human evolution — the evolutionary divergence that led to modern monkeys, apes and humans (collectively known as anthropoids) on one branch, and to living tarsiers on the other.

If these new estimates hold up, the Spanish finds become the world's oldest known examples of cave art, preceding evidence of humans» arrival in Europe by at least 20,000 years (SN Online: 11/2/11).

Paintings in the Cosquer cave near Marseilles in France are the oldest known examples of prehistoric cave painting in the world.

A fresh analysis of two previously found skulls determined they're 200,000 old, making them the oldest known examples of our species.

Neanderthals apparently created the oldest known examples of a kind of bone tool used in Europe, thus raising the possibility that modern humans may have learned how to make these tools from Neanderthals, researchers say.

Not exact matches

For example, while an older crowd may believe there's value in spending time in networking meetings, Mulcahy wants to know if anything actually comes from it.

For example, your parents may be too ill to care for your older children or your sister's parenting style might no longer jibe with yours.

For example, older generations «know» you need to stay at a job for at least two years.

He previously tried to talk to his 13 - year - old daughter about data privacy and social media — even providing examples of how much the tech companies know about people and what they can do with that information.

No doubt this is in part because Brown is now older, but the examples he brings in the first epilogue are illuminating.

If, for example, we no longer expect Christ to return upon the clouds of heaven to hold the Last Judgment, as the heavenly Son of Man of the old Aramaic - speaking communities in Palestine, we do not honor or reverence or even worship him any the less.

Recently, for example, planeloads of American fundamentalists have been travelling to Israel to view the site, Megiddo, where they believe the great clash among the nations will break out, and the battle of Armageddon will bring to an end the world as we know it.7 As this event is believed to herald the return of Jesus Christ, they have no fear for their own future, understanding from the words of Paul quoted above, that they will be «raptured» (lifted up into the sky and preserved from destruction) and that only non-believers will perish in the death of the old world.

In general, based on the 2003 interview, it doesn't look like Santorum knows how to talk or think about this issue very well; he doesn't, for example, appear to know how to distinguish the three levels of the right to privacy debate: a) the natural rights level, b) the Constitutional level, and c) the plain - old law level, state and federal.

The significance of the sacrifices was to see our sinfulness and turn our hearts back to God and that is made clear with the death of Christ.The animals though could not remove our sin that was only possible through Christ as God he could remove sin in the past present and future as he is outside of time and space not like us.So there sins in effect were covered by Jesus as well in the old testament as in the new by Gods we just did nt see it.The example of abraham able enoch they all were righteous they were justified before God.Enoch walked with God and was no more that sounds like the rapture to me so the holy spirit was present in that age just like us.We see that God has always been at work to bring life and to bring mankind to salvation.

James Sanders, for example, a well - known and respected figure in American biblical studies, receives less than a page, since, Barr explains, «he does not do much to claim that [his work] leads toward an «Old Testament theology» or a «biblical theology,»» while David Brown, a British theologian of whom Barr says the same, is the subject of a substantial and highly laudatory chapter.)

For example, in the Orphic belief system, the beginning was known as «Unaging Time», when nothing existed and nothing grew old.

For example a century ago, the only transportation was the horse riding or camel or donkey and so on... you can not imagine at that time people would be thinking about travelling the globe in a day or two... and we do not know what is coming as every scientists theory is being abrogated by a new scientist and the old one becomes obsolete... these also proves that human theory can not be perfect and will never be perfect... there will always be modifications...

The wars in the OLD TESTAMENT no longer should not serve as an example for how to live today.

«This is an absolute perfect example of the separation of church and state, and it takes a 20 - year - old to stand up and say no,» There is something extremely wrong with America and the conservative religious people are the cause of it.

«This is an absolute perfect example of the separation of church and state, and it takes a 20 - year - old to stand up and say no,» Weinstein said.

For example, I don't know any conservative who longs for the good old days of chattel slavery.

The similes of the new patch on the old garment and of new wine in the old wineskins (Mark 2:21 - 22) are susceptible of several interpretations (for example, in the joy of the Messianic age the ancient mourning customs no longer have meaning); but the original significance of the words can no longer be ascertained.

We shouldn't teach things that are patently not true; for example, we know the world is more than ten thousand years old.

For example why aren't the last verses of Mark found in the oldest known manuscripts?

Abraham looked up and saw three men standing nearby (Gen 18:2 NIV)»... Furthermore, there is a good reason to study the old Orient, the rituals and cultures of the Middel East, especially at that time,,, i myself being Half Egyptian and having been raised there, am blessed with this foreknowledge for certain things that are still the same way now as they were at th etime of Jesus and earlier,,, where Men kiss to greet one another for example,,, so when King David talks about the love of Jonathan being greater than that of a woman,,, and at the same time knowing that the Hebrew litreature (as the Arabian culture to quite an extent still is) was very poetic and used éndless symbols and parabels to express an idea,,, one might do himself a favor not jumping to conclusions which satisfy only his very own ideas and thoughts,,, the biggest problem with Bible interpretations lately is Verses ripped out of the context and interpreted in such a way that has nothing to do with its original context... «To the law and to the testimony!

The Christologies of the various forms of the kerygmata known to us from the New Testament and Christian history are not necessarily coherent with one another, still less necessarily consistent with the teaching of the historical Jesus, and historical research may well raise problems for a form of the kerygma, as, for example, research into the eschatology of Jesus raised problems for the older liberalism.

To take another example, if a seven - to - eleven - year - old child should ask if the ascension story is true, the proper reply is «No.»

If you re-introduce wheat into your diet and immediately fall back into old digestive issues, for example, you will know you have an issue with gluten or grains.

It is annoying, that the old board seemed to have Arsenals best interests at heart, yet sold to Kroenke, who they knew would be bad for the club, had plenty examples of Americans asset stripping clubs for their own benefit, (I can't think of a good American owner, past or present, yet plenty of bad ones), and indeed plenty of example and irate fans of clubs in the US that Kroenke has only managed for his own purposes.

The perfect example is Ajax — you see all the old players working for the club, on the field, in the office — the door is always open for them — but Arsenal don't do it and I don't know why,»

just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way

Facts are stubborn things.yes they are but a kid in the village who watches Benzema and Giroud every week would know who is better and is his mind will also feel that he is light yes better than Giroud.for example some players might be better than some players but due to some reason stats may support them.i am not really looking at only goalscoring but i look at everything the player does on the pitch.i said it here first i would have used an 18 year old Chuba Akpom over Giroud.The midfield makes Giroud look very good.I do nt know what makes an inform Giroud better than an inform Chamakh or inform Adebayor or inform Bendtner.Giroud when i watch him to me is nothing just nothing special.stats do nt lie but my eyes wont lie and stats may not even be accurate.so as i said Benzema will always be light years above Giroud.how some people think we can compare Giroud to Benzema is beyond me.oh!

Just looking back to conversation and how it began, now realised you suddenly popped in between without knowing what the debate was.The debate was started when a person signified that we do smart tranfers unlike other teams, to which I said getting 4 quality players for 77 odd million is smart and I also wanted to know what smart actually means and thats why I picked old examples.

Is this another example of the magical white - guy aging scale, where a 31 - year - old striker with 7 years» experience is also simultaneously a kid who just doesn't know what he's saying?

Guys why are we comparing arsenal to barca i love arsenal it my club but i must be realistic barca is lite years infront of us look at the champions league last year no match they have won the champions league twice in the last five years and the last one with kids just like arsenal so its not about how young players are because if your good enough your old enough and am afraid the arsenal youngsters walcott, deneilson, nasri, diaby, bendtner, even the great vanpercy who all arsenal fans rate who as i mentioned before (Has not scored a free kick in god knows how long) world class right these players so far have not been good enoughso do nt blame injuries too much do nt blame refs look at the way arsenal do things something is wrong here is a prime example eboue joined arsenal in the 2004/2005 season to date now tell me that a long time right would you say he is a much better player than when he arrived i think no he has improved but only very little and thats the point football is a short business at a big club you spend three seasons for the most and then you must perform.

It's also great for working out gaps in children's general knowledge, I was very surprised for example that my 8 year old didn't know the name of Prince Williams brother.

For example: You tell your 14 - year - old daughter that she can't go to a party on Friday night because you don't know if any adults will be present, and you suspect kids will be drinking.

For example, if your child persistently teases the dog and is old enough to know better, you might take away her television privileges for a couple of days.

We're not talking about examples of helicopter parenting run amok such as parents of college - age kids calling professors to argue about grades; but not supervising 9 - year - olds at all to the point that parents don't know who their friends are or what they are doing is not only opening a child up to potential risks and bad choices, but making them stressed as well.

Like all good mothers, good old Mama Nature has a way of knowing just what's good for us - and dangerous chemicals, like formaldehyde for example - just don't make the cut.

So, for example, women who donate milk to other moms who are not making enough: You don't have to look... you know, a mom who's donating milk and has an eight month old, and the baby she's donating to, is a two month old, that's still okay.

definitely, our moms were told by their pediatricians and their obstetricians, that formula was just as equally beneficial as breast milk and that's kind of what they knew at the time and so, you know, we can't hold it against our moms at all, but, you know, I know my mom for example, breastfed me till I was six weeks old and then was told by her..., by my pediatrician that she was killing me because I had a lot of gas and stuff like that, so I was immediately taken off breast milk and given formula.

A four - year - old, for example, doesn't need to know the details about intercourse, but he should feel free to ask questions, knowing he'll receive direct and accurate answers.

In case, you need the stroller to last until the baby no more needs a stroller, make sure that it is sufficiently big to hold an older child, for example, the UPPAbaby G - Lite Stroller.

Dr Tanya Byron, well known in the UK for her shows Little Angels and The House Of Tiny Tearaways, says the child should be isolated 1 minute for every year s / he has been alive - for example 2 minutes for a 2 - year - old.