Sentences with phrase «olds think watching»

A massive 84 % of 18 - 29 year olds think watching a TV series at home is a great date idea.

Not exact matches

«I think that networks are in a tough position right now, where they have shows that a lot of people watch — much more than cable shows that are considered «hits» — but they're not allowed to call them hits because they're up against an old system.»
«As soon as you say that, you think it's a bunch of old people sitting on couches watching TV.
And the analyst thinks Crawley's old foe might just be the one to watch.
When he was 12 years old, I think he was writing his first book about the Spanish American War while I was watching Brady Bunch reruns and snacking on Cheetos.
In the case of the creation story you must read it as if you were a hunter / gatherer (caveman) who did not have a concept of time (no watches, no calendars, most likely someone who didn't keep track of how old he was — think about indigenous peoples who had no contact with western civilization until the 20th century).
The great thing about watching five - year - olds work on art projects or play at recess is that they all think they are awesome at everything.
I have think I may have sinned deliberately, I sinned today or yesterday at 1 am with my own will to watch pornography and spill my seed, and three days after that I seen some images on my friends facebook page and I noticed these images which caused me to have lustful intent and I went to these images and looked at them then when to go spill my seed elsewhere, and then I did the same thing before when I recently became christian but that time I did it three times, I, m 18 years old and I felt convicted when I had done them i didn't feel right, because I felt grievy, and I didn't know anything about willfully sinning until I read this article and I, m still learning and i feel ashamed and scared of my eternity.
I think most of the Americans are in lost... as most of them do not know who their father is and it is very unfortunate... even if they know who their father is, the mom has children from diff men outside of marriage... and while a child is being raised, watching what his / her parents do to enjoy their life... so things become normal when they grow up... like if you go back early nineteen century, women were not allowed to go to beach without being covered... and now it totally opposite... if you do not have a boyfriend or girlfriend before 15, the parents worries that their teenage has some problem... and lot more can be listed... And then you go to Church, what our children learn from there... they see in front of the Church an old man's statue with long beard standing with extending of both hand... some of the status are blank, white, Spanish and so on... so they are being taught God as an old dude... then you learn from Catholic that you pray to Jesus, Mother Marry, Saints, Death spirit and all these... the poll shows a huge number of young American turns to Atheism or believing there is no God and so on... Its hard to assume where these nations are going with the name of modernization... nothing wrong having scientists discovered the cure of aids or the pics from mars but... we should all think and learn from our previous generations and correct ourselves... also ppl are becoming so much slave of material things...
Watched this with my 13 year old daughter who laughed hysterically at the thought that anyone, ANYONE, could be as stupid as this news anchor!
As I watched, I found myself thinking about how the Church, with the age - old sacrament of confession and the tradition of corporate lament, is equipped to speak powerfully and counter-culturally to this very issue.
Now, compare her children or grandchildren, who are standing in the doorway watching, with my children, who think that chicken comes from a kindly old Kentuckian with a white goatee, and one arrives at an observation and then a question of wider than cultural significance.
ok lets put it this way so everyone can understand what i mean that god said in the bible that it should be one man and woman to be married and god is the opne that wrote the bible and god is the one that die for us but if you all what to say that god is wrong and u are right then that is your choose but for me and my house we will serve the lord and we will go by what god says in the bible and if you think the bible ios wrong that is your choose but this world was better back in the old days in my home we do nt watch to much tv because it says in the bible do not put no evil before your eyes
ok well in the bible it is against divorce also but god forgives to but it is still wrong and yes i am from nc and i do live in catawba country where this took place but i do nt have to sit around and watch people make out with each other and u know lesbians and gays should read the bible more pentcosal think the same way about that it is wrong for a man and man to be togather and a woman and woman to be togather and some of you people are just plan stupid and i think that some of you just need to think it is god place to judge this pastor and it might be old fashion but back in the ol days we did nt have all this volice and all these crimes but look now there is alot of crime and volice and all we are doing is mad that a pastor said how he felt about gays and lesbiens
On a Potluck Hangout we had last night, «I Think I'm An Atheist»... we've made this one public so that you can watch it... a couple of our participants said that they were about 16 years old when they really began asking questions and were met with resistance.
but I refuse to watch anything with Kelly in it... I watch Fox news often... but when Kelly had a 12 year old girl on there a few nights ago talking about a run in with law about raising money; I had my fill... Kelly, I am a Jew and if you think Jesus was white you really are a stupid wanna - be-blonde.
On a related note, I remember watching old movies when the white colonialist looks down on natives who believe their God will return and thinks they're simple; but isn't that what we are doing when we say Jesus will return?
We bought that movie last year because we thought it would be funny to watch with our 6 year old... SO glad I watched it again beforehand.
It's hard to actually form cohesive thoughts when I'm sitting here next to my 3 year old, wearing his «big boy pants» and a construction hat, watching Toy Story 3 for the 300th time.
Been there — seen that, thought jaded old me, as I watched.
Finally, I watched a replay of the Hull City game and noticed most experienced players, if not all, tried to avoid playing a pass to Coquelin even when he was in a great position.To the normal A.O.B mind, they'll say it's a ploy by Wenger to foil Coquelin but I think it would be easier to convince a young player not to pass to him than an older one.
He's a lot of fun to watch, even if he's older than you think.
Spot on Mate, People» do nt realise what Mr Wenger has achieved, Look at the likes of Leeds United, Portsmouth (It was same rated team in Fifa 09 as Arsenal and look where they are now) Tottenham and liverpool are thinking of making new stadium for years and they are not able to do it, When people ask what has the old man given us in last ten years apart from sorrow and anguish, I would like them to point towards the stadium in which our beloved team plays and thousands of supporters watch the match.
I first watched Arsenal in 1976 and have been following home and away ever since NOT 2006, I also don't use twitter and don't play fifa, for the record I really am bored with the insinuation that if you criticise an Arsenal player, the owner or wenger then you don't support Arsenal, are happy with everything that's been going on since say the move to the grove?do you not ever think things should be done differently?did you never criticise a player?if you say no then I don't believe you.I make no hesitation in saying I'm very much on the side of the wenger out brigade, but never would I come on here and write what you've just done, for a start in might upset my seventy year old dad who is very much a AKB.I think you're just a keyboard warrior some how.Regardless though credit where credits due good performance today, and yes I did go
Arrogant fool has lost most of the fans with obvious bad tactics, excuses and lack of activity spending fans money (should never be as split as it is now AKB / AOB) the fans is what makes Arsenal, who i may add pay all the big bucks to watch The Arsenal in a fancy stadium that they paid for and what did they get in return... an old delusional stubborn man who runs their club the way he thinks its should be... 200m in the bank and nobody available??
Ibrah has been rumored and that is another CF I think would do the job for us, he may be getting older but he still has a couple years at the top left in him, if you watch him play then you will see what I mean, the guy can still do the magic.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
I think the last time I watched a game and the players looked as united as the «Battle of Old Trafford» was when Fabregas was captain.
The old adage of there being no smoke without fire might not always apply to the football transfer business, but with arsenal having been continually linked with the German international star for years I think we can assume that Julian Draxler has at least been watched carefully by Arsene Wenger.
Lacasette will do well we create a lot and he seems no how finish which we badly need da new left back great signing watch da power he has very good player watch em a lot last season it's like this we need one more we need big name I think hamsek would good bit old thou for da cash he cost, I think landing of west ham mite be good reminds me continho but go sell Sanchez and get griezmann and let him and lacasette blow league up friends forever.
I think this was clear watching him at Old Trafford.
We were sitting two seats below Monaco fans sitting laughing and taking the piss, and no one seemed to think that that's wrong, I've been to away grounds to watch Arsenal sat in the home team stand and respectfully stay quiets if we score, as a punch in the mouth often offends, I'm amazed at our home games, so many people who don't even speak English and seem to treat the game as a Sunday afternoon tea party, where are the old Arsenal fans born and bred Arsenal, I'm all for a multi cultural look but let's not lose anyone in the race to become global.
The rambling piece had been built around a statement by a 24 - year - old New Zealand journalist named Mary Burgess, who had gone, uninvited by Botham, up to his hotel room in Wellington and found him innocently occupied, you might think, watching a rerun of From Here to Eternity on TV.
«People watch ESPN and read a few newspapers and think they're informed to bet,» says Wayne Allyn Root, a 33 - year - old professional handicapper in Las Vegas.
Facts are stubborn things.yes they are but a kid in the village who watches Benzema and Giroud every week would know who is better and is his mind will also feel that he is light yes better than Giroud.for example some players might be better than some players but due to some reason stats may support them.i am not really looking at only goalscoring but i look at everything the player does on the pitch.i said it here first i would have used an 18 year old Chuba Akpom over Giroud.The midfield makes Giroud look very good.I do nt know what makes an inform Giroud better than an inform Chamakh or inform Adebayor or inform Bendtner.Giroud when i watch him to me is nothing just nothing special.stats do nt lie but my eyes wont lie and stats may not even be accurate.so as i said Benzema will always be light years above Giroud.how some people think we can compare Giroud to Benzema is beyond me.oh!
In the old NBA Carmelo as a superstar would never have been tossed How many times did we watch Shaq slam his shoulder into Sabonis backing down to the basket and then the foul was called on us I think Dame and Westbrook probably get the fewest calls driving to the basket.
When an eight - year - old or 16 - year - old are watching them train at Melwood and play for Liverpool, they're thinking «that could be me.»
«I think he could play at any of the top clubs in the league,» said Gary Neville, after watching the Frenchman play a key role as Saints defeated Manchester United 1 - 0 at Old Trafford in January.
And then there's the 2000s, when all I can think of are all those Danny Murphy 1 - 0's and having to watch the Liverpool fans in their coach home as they left Old Trafford with big smiles on their faces while we sat gloomy - faced in traffic.
Sure Nick has missed chances but he's 20 years old and I don't think you've really watched the slick interchange between the two, the range of vision and passing Bendtner has that brings his team - mates into the play and the intelligent runs that draw defenders all over the place.
@Rilub, I fully agree with this guy writting for dailymail, i think I ve already stated this matter here previousely; some guys here said that im obsessed with the young - age fact of our players but to me thats simply the truth.No other manager would have reached this stage at season end with this kind of squad, comon guys 7 out of 11 players are merely 22 yrs old, most of them arent even 22 but still 21 and half of them arent much PL experienced; reached the 1 / 2final of CL, 4th on the PL, 1 / 2final fa cup.Look at the goal scored despite of our bad start early this season.This team is gonna surprise many people next season, we will all sit here and watch, I can even bet to anyone for at least a silverware.
my kids are almost 19 and 15, my daughter 18, i tell her do not let a guy make her feel she has to have sex that is uncomfortable and does nt seem normal because most likely he grew up watching porn or listening to his friends.i tell my 15 year old that if he ever looks at it (porn), do not think thats how sex is suppose to be with a woman and that real women do not do all that nasty stuff, and real women do not look that way.
I think it will be so fun to watch him chow down on a chicken leg when he is 10 mos old!
I think he's probably watched a television screen for less than 30 minutes his whole life, and he's almost 6 - months - old.
I think allowing children to watch tv till they are old enough to entertain themselves is ok.
But having watching Maria, and then Hannah play so beautifully with film, I've been thinking about our old camera - packed away in the attic.
My husband and I are flying with our very squirmy eight month old this Saturday, and I never would have thought to watch out for the armrests.
My two and a half year old thinks it's so fun to cuddle up on the couch as a family and watch a show.
She loved watching her 4 - month - old daughter, Joey, sleep and thought it would be fun to add props and take a few pictures.
There are cute videos of the newly expectant mom asking her husband to open the oven to find a literal bun in the oven, Christmas present reveals to the dad, an adorable reveal to older siblings who ended up crying from excitement, a blindfolded dad who was blindfolded and given a taste test that included baby food, a sweet and funny game of charades, and a dad who thought he was getting an Apple watch for his birthday but instead received a positive pregnancy test!
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z