Sentences with phrase «omitted lu»
22 (Miller et al. 2014); Figures 2 and 4 of that paper likewise omit LU forcing.
https://climateaudit.org/ Not exact matches
So, as well as the previously flagged acceptance that the F2 × CO2 value of 4.1 W / m2 was wrong in the original paper, the authors now accept that LU forcing had indeed been omitted from the Historical forcing values.
But it seemed pretty obvious to me that LU forcing might well have been omitted, and both straightforward regression analysis and comparison of the spatial patterns pointed to its omission being a near certainty.
Certainly, it seems to me that LU foricng could have been omitted from the calculation of total forcing if there was some bug in the code used to perform the calculations (or possibly if there were an error in the settings used).
He has looked into it and can see no evidence of LU forcing having been omitted for the Historical simulations themselves.
In it, I showed regression results that provided evidence strongly suggesting that LU forcing had indeed been omitted from the reported Historical forcing data values.
Another reason that the outlier LU run 1 should be omitted when estimating the effect of LU forcing is that the greatly enhanced cooling it displays is linked to an abrupt cooling of over 5 C in the Labrador Sea.