Sentences with phrase «omnipotent being who»

A lack of fact in proving the existence of a god and a lack of fact proving that there is no omnipotent being who does not want to be made known but would rather have us develop faith in said omnipotent being, but since there are those who say well since there is no proof that such a being exists then I will conclude that no such being exists even though there is no proof established to verify that claim either.
There is nothing to suggest an omnipotent being who snapped his / her / its finger and created the universe.
Now... if you'd like to discuss the nature of an omnipotent being who finds it necessary to coerce bows out of his own creations, and whether or not such a being deserves to be worshipped by anyone or anything, we can certainly discuss that.
People who believe are weak minded and can not accept the fact there is not reason for anything, no loving omnipotent being who cares or anything after death.
Let's face it, anyone who believes in omnipotent beings who no one can see or touch but who direct our every waking moment has a mental problem.

Not exact matches

I pray to whichever holy name (God, Allah, Jehovah, Krishna, Jesus, etc.) suits the ONE Omniscient, Omnipresent, Omnipotent being that ignorance is wiped away from our species and we become a closer, more loving, peaceful creature and that we realize how much time we waste and how much further we push our fellow neighbor and brother under God, regardless of creed, away debating over who's God is better and discover the error of our ways before we destroy each other... before it's too late, because The End is Nigh!!!!! LOL!!!!! Really though, isn't the world full of enough tragedy, and aren't their so many more important things that need our energy and attention like the innocent children in Pakistan dying from diseases from the flood or the homeless children in our own country, or the lack of education, which is exactly what leads to this kind of debate?
So now that free will is thoroughly debunks, why does an omnipotent God who has no problem going in and slaughtering everyone suddenly powerless to stop a slaughter?
As Far fetched as an omnipotent and all powerful being seeking the adoration of his created people's, who could do ANYTHING to get it, deciding to have his son be born, persecuted and killed, raise him, and have these people eat his body once a week to remember?
If your god allowed this supremely evil act even though he is omnipotent then perhaps he is not who you think it is.
Again, assuming there is a personal God who is omnipotent, the ability to act doesn't imply the necessity, or even the desire to act.
Wouldn't the question be, if there is an omnipotent god out there who cares and loves us all, why can't he fix all the problems Mr smooth listed?
For example, a god who is described as omnibenevolent, omnipotent, and omniscient does not seem to square with reality.
No sane being would try to stand in opposition to an omnipotent god who could create a universe and everything in it.
So [41] therefore, if God the Creator «made all things freely, and by His own power, and arranged and finished them, and His will is the substance of all things, then he is discovered to be the one only God who created all things, who alone is Omnipotent» (2.30.9).10
Is it then only the omnipotent wonder - worker that you love, and not him who humbled himself to become your equal?
Whitehead wishes to avoid the controversy over whether there was before the beginning of things a Creator God who was and still is truly real and omnipotent.
He is a good, omnipotent, omniscient God, who remains in control of His creation, over which He will pronounce ultimate judgment.
For the Almighty God, who, as even the heathen acknowledge, has supreme power over all things, being Himself supremely good, would never permit the existence of anything evil among His works, if He were not so omnipotent and good that He can bring good even out of evil.
If you have on omnipotent being always watching who controls your fate, you are far less inclined to murder indiscriminately.
People who while believing in an omnipotent, eternal, and graceful God are still full of their own imperfections and limited by their own experiences and knowledge.
An omniscient, omnipotent, and perfect God who experiences emotion is impossible.
A.A. portrays the individual in a one - to - one relationship with his or her God, before whom the person must admit total powerlessness (at least over alcohol, though absolute powerlessness is implicit throughout) The alcoholic then comes to «believe in» (cognitively) a God who is omnipotent and has the ability to «restore sanity» to the addict, a God to whom one must surrender one's will.
If the occupiers don't know what they want, they're pretty sure they know who's preventing them from getting it — the wicked, omnipotent 1 %.
As far as religious availability is concerned, Whitehead held that the idea of an omnipotent God who put all sorts of imperfections in the world was a morally outrageous notion (see DANW 370).
If, he wrote, «the progress of science showed later that that conception of the world [that of Dante's age] rested on no sure foundation», still the fundamental principle remained that the universe, whatever be the order that sustains it in its parts, is the work of the creating and preserving sign of Omnipotent God, who moves and governs all, and whose glory risplende in una parte piu e meno altrove.
But she rejects theism without compromise — «the omnipotent God, the king, father, and ruler, who is above the world».1 The God of whom she speaks after the death of this God is a powerless and helpless God:
This too shall pass... in the form of dung, gas, sands through the hourglass, but Beck and those who make a buck off someone else's fear, faith, lack of fear, lack of faith, etc. will be with us to the last nanosecond of time, because what God in His or Her right omnipotent mind would want to listen to a ponitificating brat like Beck banging his gums in the back seat ad nauseum ad infinitum?
In the first Meditation, he writes: «Nevertheless, for a long time I have had in mind a certain opinion that there is a God who is omnipotent and by whom I have been created as I am» (16).
God is a risk - taker and suffers setbacks along that joumey, but God is also an omnipotent redeemer who knows how to bring good out of evil.
How about you should be smarter than to trust anyone who claims to know the mind of an omnipotent being that does not exist.
In my opinion, the only possible approach for a Christian theologian in dealing with the presence of evil is that of Thomas Aquinas, who holds, pace David Hume, that an omnipotent and benevolent God can coexist with evil in His finite creation, but only when the world is viewed both as a totality and under the aegis of eschatology.
You'd think an omnipotent god, who poofed the entire universe into existence with one thought, would be able to force a simple tît, àss, pènis, or fûck, past a filter that 8 year old boys can circûmvent with ease.
The idea of god, you know the omnipotent guy who you say lives in the sky, having an enemy is ridiculous.
Therefore everyone should follow this path of investigation and should know where he comes from and should recognize that an Eternal Being who is omniscient, omnipotent, all will, all wisdom, and all justice created him.
Not sure, «cos it hurts at times, but I won't believe in a God who is omnipotent and all - loving, who wants to give us something wonderful, and doesn't succeed in getting us there in the end.
However you rationalize it, if you were omnipotent, omniscient, and all - loving, you wouldn't allow anyone to suffer, and you certainly wouldn't create an individual who was just going to end up in hell.
Vague and gigantic, he is off somewhere, the one who created the cosmos, omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent, and when in religious poetry they try to picture him, they sing,
If they believe their God is so omnipotent, why do nt they just let him pass his self - serving, hateful judgement himself instead of going around imposing their own wills on people who do nt prescribe to their beliefs.
But Jesus knew that this is not the actual situation of man, for whom God the omnipotent is the distant God, who therefore must pray that God may show him His activity.
We are created in his image (Genesis 1:26) God is a spiritual being who is omnipotent and omniscient.
People who ask these questions have not been liberated from the concept of God as omnipotent dictator of the universe, who is responsible for everything that happens and who, if he willed, could change the course of events by sheer fiat.
An omnipotent being, who knows every way in which an evil can come into existence, has the power to prevent that evil from coming into existence.
A determinist might want to argue that there is an omnipotent observer, who sees that the appropriate mutation occurs at the appropriate time so that the two chains of events interact with benefit to the organism.
That is indeed a giant leap forward from theism's attempts to «shoehorn» love into the essential being of a God who is omnipotent Lord of all.
Griffin points out that in company with a great many other contributors to the recent literature on the problem of evil, Mackie assumes that an omnipotent being is one who can bring about any state of affairs the description of which is logically consistent.
only one who is omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent can declare the state of godhood; ours is only a pathetic conjecture.
In fact, Twain's Satan comes on like a Calvinist who has lost faith in an omniscient and omnipotent Deity and thus may be a reflection of Twain's own distaste for the Calvinist strain in American Protestantism.
If there is a god who is omnipotent, doesn't he already know what we want?
had to reply to your simplistic view of things... remember we are only human yet GOD is perfect, all powerful, all knowing and as humans we will never be able to see things from an omnipotent viewpoint such as GOD's... so remember bad things happen daily and it is GOD's will but who are we to question GOD allmighty when we only think in mindset of humans... do nt let ur foolish pride put a spotlight on ur ignorance...
What is interesting is that if you believe in the bible, you can not, by definition have free will if there is an omnipotent, omniscient God who created you.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z