A lack of fact in proving the existence of a god and a lack of fact proving that there is
no omnipotent being who does not want to be made known but would rather have us develop faith in said omnipotent being, but since there are those who say well since there is no proof that such a being exists then I will conclude that no such being exists even though there is no proof established to verify that claim either.
There is nothing to suggest
an omnipotent being who snapped his / her / its finger and created the universe.
Now... if you'd like to discuss the nature of
an omnipotent being who finds it necessary to coerce bows out of his own creations, and whether or not such a being deserves to be worshipped by anyone or anything, we can certainly discuss that.
People who believe are weak minded and can not accept the fact there is not reason for anything, no loving
omnipotent being who cares or anything after death.
Let's face it, anyone who believes in
omnipotent beings who no one can see or touch but who direct our every waking moment has a mental problem.
Not exact matches
I pray to whichever holy name (God, Allah, Jehovah, Krishna, Jesus, etc.) suits the ONE Omniscient, Omnipresent,
Omnipotent being that ignorance
is wiped away from our species and we become a closer, more loving, peaceful creature and that we realize how much time we waste and how much further we push our fellow neighbor and brother under God, regardless of creed, away debating over
who's God
is better and discover the error of our ways before we destroy each other... before it
's too late, because The End
is Nigh!!!!! LOL!!!!! Really though, isn't the world full of enough tragedy, and aren't their so many more important things that need our energy and attention like the innocent children in Pakistan dying from diseases from the flood or the homeless children in our own country, or the lack of education, which
is exactly what leads to this kind of debate?
So now that free will
is thoroughly debunks, why does an
omnipotent God
who has no problem going in and slaughtering everyone suddenly powerless to stop a slaughter?
As Far fetched as an
omnipotent and all powerful
being seeking the adoration of his created people's,
who could do ANYTHING to get it, deciding to have his son
be born, persecuted and killed, raise him, and have these people eat his body once a week to remember?
If your god allowed this supremely evil act even though he
is omnipotent then perhaps he
is not
who you think it
is.
Again, assuming there
is a personal God
who is omnipotent, the ability to act doesn't imply the necessity, or even the desire to act.
Wouldn't the question
be, if there
is an
omnipotent god out there
who cares and loves us all, why can't he fix all the problems Mr smooth listed?
For example, a god
who is described as omnibenevolent,
omnipotent, and omniscient does not seem to square with reality.
No sane
being would try to stand in opposition to an
omnipotent god
who could create a universe and everything in it.
So [41] therefore, if God the Creator «made all things freely, and by His own power, and arranged and finished them, and His will
is the substance of all things, then he
is discovered to
be the one only God
who created all things,
who alone
is Omnipotent» (2.30.9).10
Is it then only the
omnipotent wonder - worker that you love, and not him
who humbled himself to become your equal?
Whitehead wishes to avoid the controversy over whether there
was before the beginning of things a Creator God
who was and still
is truly real and
omnipotent.
He
is a good,
omnipotent, omniscient God,
who remains in control of His creation, over which He will pronounce ultimate judgment.
For the Almighty God,
who, as even the heathen acknowledge, has supreme power over all things,
being Himself supremely good, would never permit the existence of anything evil among His works, if He
were not so
omnipotent and good that He can bring good even out of evil.
If you have on
omnipotent being always watching
who controls your fate, you
are far less inclined to murder indiscriminately.
People
who while believing in an
omnipotent, eternal, and graceful God
are still full of their own imperfections and limited by their own experiences and knowledge.
An omniscient,
omnipotent, and perfect God
who experiences emotion
is impossible.
A.A. portrays the individual in a one - to - one relationship with his or her God, before whom the person must admit total powerlessness (at least over alcohol, though absolute powerlessness
is implicit throughout) The alcoholic then comes to «believe in» (cognitively) a God
who is omnipotent and has the ability to «restore sanity» to the addict, a God to whom one must surrender one's will.
If the occupiers don't know what they want, they
're pretty sure they know
who's preventing them from getting it — the wicked,
omnipotent 1 %.
As far as religious availability
is concerned, Whitehead held that the idea of an
omnipotent God
who put all sorts of imperfections in the world
was a morally outrageous notion (see DANW 370).
If, he wrote, «the progress of science showed later that that conception of the world [that of Dante's age] rested on no sure foundation», still the fundamental principle remained that the universe, whatever
be the order that sustains it in its parts,
is the work of the creating and preserving sign of
Omnipotent God,
who moves and governs all, and whose glory risplende in una parte piu e meno altrove.
But she rejects theism without compromise — «the
omnipotent God, the king, father, and ruler,
who is above the world».1 The God of whom she speaks after the death of this God
is a powerless and helpless God:
This too shall pass... in the form of dung, gas, sands through the hourglass, but Beck and those
who make a buck off someone else's fear, faith, lack of fear, lack of faith, etc. will
be with us to the last nanosecond of time, because what God in His or Her right
omnipotent mind would want to listen to a ponitificating brat like Beck banging his gums in the back seat ad nauseum ad infinitum?
In the first Meditation, he writes: «Nevertheless, for a long time I have had in mind a certain opinion that there
is a God
who is omnipotent and by whom I have
been created as I
am» (16).
God
is a risk - taker and suffers setbacks along that joumey, but God
is also an
omnipotent redeemer
who knows how to bring good out of evil.
How about you should
be smarter than to trust anyone
who claims to know the mind of an
omnipotent being that does not exist.
In my opinion, the only possible approach for a Christian theologian in dealing with the presence of evil
is that of Thomas Aquinas,
who holds, pace David Hume, that an
omnipotent and benevolent God can coexist with evil in His finite creation, but only when the world
is viewed both as a totality and under the aegis of eschatology.
You'd think an
omnipotent god,
who poofed the entire universe into existence with one thought, would
be able to force a simple tît, àss, pènis, or fûck, past a filter that 8 year old boys can circûmvent with ease.
The idea of god, you know the
omnipotent guy
who you say lives in the sky, having an enemy
is ridiculous.
Therefore everyone should follow this path of investigation and should know where he comes from and should recognize that an Eternal
Being who is omniscient,
omnipotent, all will, all wisdom, and all justice created him.
Not sure, «cos it hurts at times, but I won't believe in a God
who is omnipotent and all - loving,
who wants to give us something wonderful, and doesn't succeed in getting us there in the end.
However you rationalize it, if you
were omnipotent, omniscient, and all - loving, you wouldn't allow anyone to suffer, and you certainly wouldn't create an individual
who was just going to end up in hell.
Vague and gigantic, he
is off somewhere, the one
who created the cosmos,
omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent, and when in religious poetry they try to picture him, they sing,
If they believe their God
is so
omnipotent, why do nt they just let him pass his self - serving, hateful judgement himself instead of going around imposing their own wills on people
who do nt prescribe to their beliefs.
But Jesus knew that this
is not the actual situation of man, for whom God the
omnipotent is the distant God,
who therefore must pray that God may show him His activity.
We
are created in his image (Genesis 1:26) God
is a spiritual
being who is omnipotent and omniscient.
People
who ask these questions have not
been liberated from the concept of God as
omnipotent dictator of the universe,
who is responsible for everything that happens and
who, if he willed, could change the course of events by sheer fiat.
An
omnipotent being,
who knows every way in which an evil can come into existence, has the power to prevent that evil from coming into existence.
A determinist might want to argue that there
is an
omnipotent observer,
who sees that the appropriate mutation occurs at the appropriate time so that the two chains of events interact with benefit to the organism.
That
is indeed a giant leap forward from theism's attempts to «shoehorn» love into the essential
being of a God
who is omnipotent Lord of all.
Griffin points out that in company with a great many other contributors to the recent literature on the problem of evil, Mackie assumes that an
omnipotent being is one
who can bring about any state of affairs the description of which
is logically consistent.
only one
who is omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent can declare the state of godhood; ours
is only a pathetic conjecture.
In fact, Twain's Satan comes on like a Calvinist
who has lost faith in an omniscient and
omnipotent Deity and thus may
be a reflection of Twain's own distaste for the Calvinist strain in American Protestantism.
If there
is a god
who is omnipotent, doesn't he already know what we want?
had to reply to your simplistic view of things... remember we
are only human yet GOD
is perfect, all powerful, all knowing and as humans we will never
be able to see things from an
omnipotent viewpoint such as GOD's... so remember bad things happen daily and it
is GOD's will but
who are we to question GOD allmighty when we only think in mindset of humans... do nt let ur foolish pride put a spotlight on ur ignorance...
What
is interesting
is that if you believe in the bible, you can not, by definition have free will if there
is an
omnipotent, omniscient God
who created you.