If, he wrote, «the progress of science showed later that that conception of the world [that of Dante's age] rested on no sure foundation», still the fundamental principle remained that the universe, whatever be the order that sustains it in its parts, is the work of the creating and preserving sign
of Omnipotent God, who moves and governs all, and whose glory risplende in una parte piu e meno altrove.
The Problem of Evil — B. Bennett CBC «Christians famously have the problem of pain: how can a benevolent and
omnipotent god permit evil to exist?»
Church attendance is also for my benefit (
omnipotent God already knows i believe in Him), a way for me to take comfort in the shared faith of my neighbors when my belief in the goodness of people starts to slip.
Your Christian god missed out on 5 billion people today that do not believe any of your supernatural Christian beliefs, pretty
lame omnipotent god you have there.
A
real omnipotent god (with all the other omni attributes as well), would need nothing whatsoever, including us and the entire universe.
Funny that this
allegedly omnipotent god whipped up all this drama surrounding a flood when it could have just snapped it's fingers and evil humanity, bad kangaroos and insolent pigeons would have just vanished.
And Mister Mister...
Omnipotent God remember, you do nt think the Loving One can knock out a few walls as needed (or make the Lake a bit deeper....
An
omniscient omnipotent god would have no need to intervene, it would only need to create the correct initial conditions and we would come out of the oven 4 billion years later.
Where we disagree is that conclusion leads me to realize the non-existence of god since the existence of a
good omnipotent god that created us in his image is an obvious logical fallacy; you, on the other - hand prefer to take that information and suspend your rational abilities to allow yourself to continue to believe such a paradox.
I love how the omniscient,
omnipotent god changes his mind and must make corrections to the book that he «wrote».
Still, if we leave it at this the position of the believer is equally unjustified, which is why I want to return to the argument of the
infinite omnipotent God's existence being self evident (in my next comment).
Paradoxically, pseudostatistical reasoning suggests that the
most omnipotent god won't notice your underwear, either.
Not to mention, the three epic central showdowns against Vergil that set standards of capturing the feverish, relentless intensity of two
equally omnipotent god - like beings going at each other.
To say god can only be known by faith is to say that
an omnipotent god is unwilling or unable to gain believers by direct demonstation.
Keep in mind that this is supposed to be
an OMNIPOTENT god, capable of acting in ANY way he chooses.
An omnipotent,
omnipotent god would not coexist with the Ebola virus.
A morally motivated population that does «right» because it is «right» and not because they are personally intimidated by the short - tempered and vindictive being otherwise described as
the omnipotent God of Abraham, or Mohammed, etc. is the worst nightmare of those who would exploit mankind in the name of such.
therefore a wasteful God is not perfect, and there goes your concept of
a Omnipotent God.
Your book that is supposed to be the word of
your omnipotent god has 2 CONTRADICTORY versions of how it all happened!!!
We must have an enlargement of our conception of God, then we will know that we have come to a place where all things are possible, for our God is
an omnipotent God for impossible positions.»
How does
an omnipotent God put it's hands in humans?
Why would
an omnipotent God allow such poor performance when as you said, it could easily fix that by just showing up.
Do you think that
an omnipotent god has any concern with the education of humans on the tiny speck of planet earth i mean honestly human education couldn't even touch the mind of a God
Wouldn't the question be, if there is
an omnipotent god out there who cares and loves us all, why can't he fix all the problems Mr smooth listed?
He clearly argues that it is genuine evil (as defined by Mackie and Griffin) which need not be seen as incompatible with a wholly good,
omnipotent God.
the life of his only son, Jesus ---- I wonder why
an omnipotent God would only be able to beget 1 son?
12: There exist intrinsically possible states of affairs devoid of evil which
an omnipotent God can unilaterally bring about.
I1: There exists no intrinsically possible state of affairs devoid of evil which
an omnipotent God can not unilaterally bring about.
Wouldn't
an omnipotent god that demands blind faith see through such a LIE?