Sentences with phrase «omniscience means»

Just as omniscience means that all existence is regarded as intelligible, so holiness means that all action is involved in some moral order and that every moral achievement, however worthy, stands under a higher judgment.

Omniscience means immediacy, indirect knowledge can not, I should suppose, be perfect» (Letter of January 22, 1942).

The divine omnipresence means the divine Love's universal action; the divine omniscience means the divine Love's awareness of the depths and heights of possibility; the divine transcendence means the divine Love's utter inexhaustibility; the divine immanence means the divine Love's unfailing presence.

Not exact matches

Other concepts are also discussed: The meaning of the Word «God, Monotheism, «God» defined, God's existence, Polytheism, Arguments for existence of God, Omnipotence, Omniscience, Immanence and Transcendence, Creation, and God as personal.

And I hope and pray that you haven't in anyway intentionally or unintentionally demeaned God or lowered the perfection and glory of Christ or the Holy Trinity in any manner by giving a different meaning to His omniscience.

From Sonja: So if I'm understanding open theism right, it sounds like it's similar to — if not the same as — the idea that «omniscience» in God doesn't mean «knows exactly what will happen» but instead means «knows every single permutation of what could happen.»

Omniscience would have to include the future, otherwise the meaning of the word (all - knowing) is directly contradicted.

Next, if God's «omniscience» is taken to mean that he knows all things that actually are, then Hartshorne agrees that God is omniscient.

But God, who is love, who is «the fellow - sufferer who understands», and whose wisdom penetrates all that is actual and is aware of the relevant possibilities (but as possibilities, not in whatever may be made actual among them, for that is «open» until it happens and God's omniscience can not mean that He knows, hence must determine, what will occur before it occurs), can make an appraisal that is both accurate and merciful — that is «just» and loving.

If you mean All that you must be making claims to omniscience or committing a logical fallacy.

Given our stress on freedom in the divine nature, we need to reinterpret omniscience of the future so that it means not a fixed knowledge of every coming event held in a timeless instant, but the simultaneous grasp of an absolute infinity of possibles — a capability we human beings lack — and an instantaneous calculation of the odds for all future possible events and actions.

The Earth as universal mother and creatrix par excellence is not omniscient, that is to say that she does not have that omniscience which is rooted in all - seeing (the Greek oida, «I know,» properly means «I have seen»).

We can not identify him by referring to some formal characteristic like righteousness or love (for everything depends upon the particular concrete meaning of such a term: other «Gods» have been thought of as loving and righteous, not to mention omnipotence, omniscience, and the rest).

it's not merely saying «i don't know,» but making a claim to omniscience that either we CA N'T know or at least — not by certain means.